No ****ing Way I'm Posting Pictures Of Me Or My Lady Friends

Do you think its morally correct to post "your women" pics?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 46.9%
  • No

    Votes: 26 53.1%

  • Total voters
    49

SamePendo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
2,396
Reaction score
14
Location
At home
Ok, who's with me?

I won't. Too much of a risk for me.

I don't want people to know me. I don't want people who know me to know THIS part of me.

And I don't want to jeopardize the privacy of the women of whom I'd post pictures.

Even if I post pictures of "me" and/or "my women" how can you know it's me anyway? How can you know if I really DJed them the way I said, and not by.. I don't know, showing money, who knows.

Just take advice, and you'll soon see who talks **** and who doesn't. Act, and then you'll start giving sound advice.
 

Lost In Translation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
11
Location
Australia
while i respect the people who do post pics of themselves and their women and it certainly adds credibility to their posts

there are alot of people who don't post pictures and i still respect them because i recognise the game in thier posts

personally i will not post pictures of myself on the internet

i don't feel like i need to prove anything. i know what i post is true and based upon my experience and i think people can see that.

i guess in a perfect world i probably would post pictures.

but i have alot of enemies and the world is a very small place.

i have had an extremly messed up life involving police , murder attempts , gangs , jail , crime etc etc etc

since i left home at 14 years of age

war has made me paranoid ;)

there would be lucky to be 20 photos of me since i was 14

no more birthdays after i left home. no christmas.

so no photos.

the police have photos of me at various ages ( mug shots ) but even those are few and far between.

my peace or mind is more important than a reputation on an internet forum

but i think my circumstances are extreme and i would be one of the exceptions to the rule


Lost In Translation :D

**AUSTRALIAN STREET PIMP**
 

Fluke

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Age
39
Location
Memphis, TN
Personally I could care less about posting a picture and to prove it this is me http://www.hotornot.com/r/?eid=B8E8AQK&key=SAC

But on the other hand I would never post a link to a picture on something like a myspace profile or anything where someone could be malicious and mail people on my friends list links to posts made on this forum.

I dont really think it is that likely that someone you know is gonna come on here reading this **** and then discover your picture.

But if someone did find out they could go to hell Im not going to try to dodge around it and if they wanna talk **** they are gonna get their ass beat or prepare to beat mine. People who know me know not to mess with me, but I guess a lot of people on here still lack confidence in theirselves and are kind of ***** guys too, so I could see how they would consider it devastating to be discovered. And that is not saying anyone who prefers not to post pictures is a ***** everyone has their own reasons and opinions and could have experienced a lot more crazy **** than I have.
 

Climax

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
5
hmmm...

I think that if she is fine with it, then why not? And if u know this chick, u should know if she would mind or not. But I don’t think I would put a pic of a chick that I know here if she wouldn’t want me to. Personally I don’t really see a point in posting pics of the chicks we have had etc. Women are not trophies to show off to the world. But hey, who really cares? life goes on!;)


Laterz....
 

Oxide

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Messages
3,233
Reaction score
26
don't want people to know me. I don't want people who know me to know THIS part of me.
OH MY GOD. You tried to become a better person! Shame on you!

Stop being such a sensitive baby. First of all, who is looking through this forum to look you up?! Nobody. I've told people before about this part of my life and most dont give two sh1ts.


Try this - post picture of yourself. Then post a picture of a girl. If they are separate you can say things like "I dont know who put it on internet" ... for fvcks sake look around -facebook, myspace, photobucket, everyone is putting the pics online! If she finds her picture you can always deny it or say "I have no clue how it happened!"

I mean, i am thinking about poisting a nude pic of a girl here... of course i will edit out her face.
 

The Nice Guy is Gone

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
325
Reaction score
2
I don't even have to read this to respond:

All the personal info you'll get from me is the state I live in. For those of you who don't know, it's Texas.

Now, I intend to keep my identity secret on this board, because I don't want some people to know who I am, especially since it is very possible that it could be someone that I know.

I'll post my field reports and so forth, but I will not post pics.

I was on messenger not too long ago with someone from this site, and they asked about pics. My answer was this:

I don't do pics on this site.

I'll stick with that answer.
 

diablo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
4,685
Reaction score
8
Location
Louisiana, USA
AE...

Of course it's not morally wrong to post pictures, unless said pictures are demeaning or downgrade the person in question in some way. A picture is just a picture. Speaking of morals, isn't the reason you're here right now so you can improve your game in order to have premarital sex? :rolleyes:
 

SamePendo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
2,396
Reaction score
14
Location
At home
Originally posted by diablo
A picture is just a picture.
Yeah, who said premarital sex is immoral?

Oxide: Talking about babies (cry babies..) why not just ask her upfront if it's ok if I post her pic? And quit the mess.
 

diablo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
4,685
Reaction score
8
Location
Louisiana, USA
Originally posted by SamePendo
Yeah, who said premarital sex is immoral?
It's the general consensus of society that sex before marriage is immoral. It's been that way for centuries, and is probably a holdover from the middle ages or somesuch. In any case, it's rather ironic to be asking if posting a picture of a girl (that she willingly posed for) is immoral, especially when the question is being asked on a site dedicated to getting into girls panties.

Doing both things are perfectly fine by me.
 

DJ4Real

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
947
Reaction score
0
In a non exploitive manner it's appropriate. This is a double standard question.
 

TheRelic

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
583
Reaction score
0
Premarital sex is definetly no longer taboo.

Not in this society south of the equator, anyway.

And morals concerning one said party engaging in consentual sex acts before marriage, as opposed to those involving others being posted on the internet as conquests?

Different kettle of fish entirely...

@LIT - pm me your name, address, and home phone number, and i'll send you a chrissy pressie you poor deprived man ;)
 

Lost In Translation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
11
Location
Australia
thanks TheRelic but i am ok :D

always interesting to not get too attached to belongings

we hoard so much junk in our lifetimes

so many gifts so much waste

when your house is on fire

or you are homeless it is interesting what is really important


i would not be the man i am today without having to experience these things

it is character building

i just hope it's a good character


Lost In Translation :D

**AUSTRALIAN STREET PIMP**

" stop being insecure " i hate that saying. it's a cop out for not having enough balls to confront a woman about what she is doing THAT IS WRONG or potentially damaging to a long term relationship. – Lost In Translation
 

Porky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by diablo
It's the general consensus of society that sex before marriage is immoral. It's been that way for centuries, and is probably a holdover from the middle ages or somesuch. In any case, it's rather ironic to be asking if posting a picture of a girl (that she willingly posed for) is immoral, especially when the question is being asked on a site dedicated to getting into girls panties.

Doing both things are perfectly fine by me.
for centuries it was also the general consensus that it was immoral for black and white people to marry :rolleyes: whatever you say though, D.

immoral is the wrong word to use here. while it isn't morally reprehensible for me to post pictures of my girlfriends, if they found out they would be upset. therefore it is wrong.
 

TheRelic

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
583
Reaction score
0
*waits for calculated response from D to cut porky to tears* :D
 

RaWBLooD

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
999
Reaction score
0
Age
43
Location
depends
When you get right down to it, pictures dont help you, they are just a way to show off.

This is the important piece though ; If a poster on this site has a hard time determining whos giving **** advice and who's giving good advice, he is bull****ting, he has simply not tried any advice and therefore has no personal experience to compare the advice to.

Posting pictures is really charity, except that in this case the pictures dont help anyone at all, what are they going to do? Motivate? You seriously need to get out if a picture on the internet is going to motivate you.

Seriously what are pictures here going to do to help others? they wont, they are honestly just pictures, and it takes effort to take pictures and show them here.

So honestly all that posting pictures in the end does is, inflate ego to the poster. Nothing else.
 

diablo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
4,685
Reaction score
8
Location
Louisiana, USA
Moral - "Conforming to standards of what is right or just in behavior"
http://www.dictionary.com

Originally posted by Porky
for centuries it was also the general consensus that it was immoral for black and white people to marry :rolleyes: whatever you say though, D.
You're taking apples and trying to squeeze orange juice out of them with that statement. I agree with another poster that the issue of premarital sex isn't taboo in society any longer, however it is still considered by the majority to still be immoral. Not to start a religious debate, but it's a fact that nearly everybody subscribes to one set of religious doctrine or another. While the religions may vary, there is one thing that all but some fringe cults agree on - sex is something you should save until marriage. Whether this is right or wrong isn't for debate, the underlying fact remains that religious values shaped our societies into what they are today - and because of this, premarital sex - while not taboo - is still considered immoral by society. Ask an upstanding member of your community or church what their views are on fornication - odds are good that they will tell you the same thing I've been saying.

In further reference to the 'blacks dating whites being immoral' at one point in time, this is literally correct. However, the arguments that advocates of this statement made were all centrally flawed. When you peel off the bias and stigmas associated with it all you're left with is that some people didn't like black people mixing with whites. Nothing more, nothing less. They used 'morality' as an excuse to further their racist views. The argument that sex should be saved for marriage, on the other hand, isn't flawed. In a perfect union, both the husband and the wife should be able to give each other to one another for their first time. It's not hiding racism, it's not hiding bigotry. It's just the way that things are. Obviously, this isn't a perfect world and sex before marriage does happen (and I'm probably the abstinence's crowd's worst nightmare, someone who can't recall how many people he's slept with). The fact that sex between unwed partners happens, and frequently, doesn't negate the fact that it is immoral. If that was the case, if more people started urinating on their partner during sex, this would be considered moral as well. If more people started doing gangbangs, they would be moral. If people got their animals involved, bestiality would become moral. Obviously, they aren't, nor will they ever be.

Sex is a great thing. I enjoy it on a regular basis, and I'm not married... and I'm sure many of you do too, or you wouldn't be on the site. However, you should realize that it doesn't promote the goodness of human character, and because of this it is considered - and will be considered - to be immoral.
 

aftershock

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 30, 2004
Messages
728
Reaction score
4
Location
England
I'm not going to post pictures of me or any chicks I pull on the Internet, or this site.

If other guys want to do that, fine. I don't want to.
 
Top