rascal99v
Senior Don Juan
Stugots26 said:Someone thinks they need to text a woman to wet her panties...when the anticipation of the date should be able to do that for you if she's really interested in you.
It doesn't matter what method you use to set up dates, call or text, as long as that's all you use the phone for. Set up the specifics of the date in as few steps as possible and get off the phone and let her wonder about you. It'll have more of an effect on her than any amount of flirtatious text will, because she'll have her beta orbiters texting her in your absence to demonstrate the contrast.
The reason I use text is because I'm a lawyer, and I prefer having things in writing, and unless a woman loses her phone between setting the date and the date itself, she'll have the details of your date, including any addresses, in writing. Even if I set the day we're meeting on the phone, I get back to them soon afterwards via text with the place and time so it's in writing, so that there's no misunderstanding.
I've minimized contact between the setup and the date because it allows me to see what happens in the interim. Women have gotten frustrated with me for not confirming a date in the hours before, and tried to cancel to punish me, and I will NOT confirm an already definite date. That's their own insecurities. If they get in touch hours before wanting to know if we're still on for the evening, which they usually do, it's because they're thinking and wondering about me and want to see me.
Harry Wilmington said:Amazingly, I agree with all of this - it's the exact same stuff I've been saying on here for YEARS.
Stugots26 said:My god, HW, that's some real $hit advice.
:crackup:
Another Anti Texting guy spouting off his nonsense thinking "his way" is "the only way". And of course Harry will agree with that. :yes:
Like I said before, there is a pattern here with the posters, like minds agree with each other. Stugots26 contradicts himself agreeing with Harry's advice which he calls "sh1t advice". It's pretty damn funny when you see this stuff. :crackup:
When a chick is interested in you, there is no need to confirm and they won't get "frustrated" with you for not confirming. They sure as hell won't try to "punish" you either.
Any type of punishment given from a woman goes towards a beta man who she disrespects. She doesn't think too highly of you already becaue she feels you are of less value. Therefore, you won't get a date or get laid. That's just the way it is and how it goes. :yes:
That's why you call them and let them know what the deal is so there is no question about it. She will be excited to see you and will not give you a hassle and will show up on time looking nice and hot.
That's why chicks will text you when they are thinking and wondering about you. To see what you are up to. Good texts will wet their panties even more with the interest they already have. That will replace a date turning it into fvck date when they already feel they have a connection with you.
You are not the only dude she gave her number to, so when another dude out games you, she will be thinking and wondering about him forgetting all about you.
But Stugots26, like the other Anti Texting guys, take my words out of context to fit their own philosophy. It happens all the time in here, with them using their same old tired talking points that have been disproven. Ridiculous. :yes:
I've never met an interested chick in my life who stays silent like these guys try to claim.
I remember when I messed up my leg snowboarding and was laid up for a couple of weeks. I met a chick who I was supposed to go out with 3 or 4 days later. I couldn't go out so we only texted during that time. And it was quite a bit of texting we did too. We had sex on the first date we had that night. When we were both laying in bed after, she told me that she "Never slept with a guy before on the first date." Did I care if she was telling me the truth? No. What matters is what she said to me after that. She said that "She felt like she already knew me and that we've already been on a couple of dates before." So, the texting we did replaced the dates and escalated things faster to sex. That's why I texted ever since then. She wasn't the only chick who told me that.
When I have tool to use for my advantage, I'm going to use it. No need wasting time on extra dates when you don't need to. Texting works because it has given me great results because I can game several chicks at the same time including keeping in touch with my plates.
Beta orbiters are useless and the chicks just pacify them. Interested chicks will always make an effort to communicate with you. I'm not sure why you Anti Texting guys still can't understand that.
Confirming the date in text will not give you any better edge when the chick has no intentions of going out.
And it's no coincidence that when you're talking on the phone to set up your date, a chick will flake on the dude who texted the date.
Look at all the dudes in here who texted their dates and got flaked on.
Sh1t, when I called a chick up one time for a date she had to flake on some other guy previously that she already had a date with. I asked her why she did that, She told me that "Our convo was cool and that I was a fun guy. The other guy only texted me for a date." I called for dates ever since then. She isn't the only chick to do that.
At that time I was fine tuning my game, and I wanted to know everything that would work to my advantage. I learned quickly what worked and how to go about doing it.
You can't use the same deal on every chick, which is why your standard method over and over again doesn't work.
Some chicks will text you more, others won't, and some you don't. What matters is interest, she either has it or doesn't.
And when you're getting "frustrated chicks to punish you" with your method, that shows that it doesn't work. You are starting out on the wrong foot with these chicks and that isn't good. :yes: