Just stopping by on a break from a new book I'm writing based on the "postgame." Have to laugh at the men who say we all have to come up with new ideas now that the "canned" stuff is known, but where are these new ideas?
I have to get back to my writing so I can only stay a few minutes (false time constraint), but I'll answer the most common questions I see here and elsewhere about The Game and its publicity:
1. "Chicks will still like ****. What's the problem?"
She may love ****, but that doesn't mean she has to have YOUR ****. If before, you were getting laid by running some simple game, now you're going to have to work much harder. This happens in chess all the time: even Bobby Fischer's games are weak by today's standards, because the overall theory has advanced. That makes it much harder to become a chess champion now because even the average player has a good grasp of basic chess theory and can beat a strong player who makes a mistake. If you had a method for making money in the stock market and published it, people would still make money in the markets, but not with your method.
2. "If you're smart, cool, creative, and have your life together, you have nothing to worry about."
This one's a laugher: the whole idea of this "community" was to help the guys who DIDN'T have all this stuff. If the future gurus are going to tell guys something every AFC has said for the last century, they aren't going to be teaching much. The only reason anyone turns to a seduction guru is to get women they wouldn't get without the method. That goes back to 1) above: where are all these "new ideas?" (I have tons of them because I saw this coming several years ago and have already developed new routines that work well).
3. "The Rules didn't ruin the game for men, did it?"
Bad analogy, since a woman's "game" is based almost entirely on her looks rather than her behavior. Exposure of the rules didn't change the fact that if she's ugly, no one's going to care if she's playing hard to get, while if she's hot, she's doing that anyway.
4. "Chicks won't care if they know you're using routines on them."
Maybe not, but if she's "in love" with the last guy to game her and off the market, you won't get very far. Having 1,000 times as many guys hitting on her with game isn't going to be good for anyone, and if the AFCs now have game, you'll have to deal with guys who have all the other stuff going for them AND who don't make mistakes. Then it comes down to who is taller, better looking, richer, and cooler because you no longer have a case where the "inferior" guy can equalize his disadvantages with "game." I bet the guys who say The Game is no problem are the more desirable of the lot.
5. "PUAs will just evolve and adapt."
Yes, 5-10 percent of them will. Now what do the other 90 percent do? They were drawn to this "community" because they were able to find EASY ways to equalize the game, not to hear that they need to devote their lives to "getting their **** together" so that women will find them desirable, and then having to run game on top of that. Where is all this evolution that I'm hearing about? Where is the new material?
6. "Seduction isn't about routines, but LIFESTYLE!"
Really? Is becoming a chess champion about lifestyle or about studying chess? The difference here is that lifestyle won't defeat your opponents at chess, but it will attract women. That's all well and good, but it's also not game. Seduction gurus are not fitness gurus, fashion gurus, or career coaches, yet they are basically functioning as this if they preach "lifestyle."
What's really going on here is that
1. The public is pissed that it ignored this material when it was on the net and far more effective. They are brainwashed by big media and don't hear the message until someone like Style is the messenger. Nothing was stopping them from searching the web for years before, but they just don't respect internet writers with e-books, treating us like we're in the Negro Leagues.
2. The gurus have been copying each other for years (I'm the guy who coined the term "pivot" and who debuted the reverse timetable, returning fox, CUPID ratings ("inner game" now), and a bunch of other stuff, with registered copyrights to prove it), and now that their "secrets" are out in the open and they have to adapt, they've been caught with their pants down because they don't have a ****ing clue what comes next, but their livings are now tied to their ability to keep their students ahead of the curve, which most cannot do.
3. The public wants a new EASY method for getting laid, one that hasn't hit the mainstream radar. Do these methods exist? Certainly. Unfortunately, the creators of the NEW methods are colliding with the old guard that doesn't want to let go of its customer base, and the customers don't want to admit that what they spent all that money on is becoming worthless.
4. The "postgame" theory is going to cover places that most PUA won't want to go. It won't be possible to claim to be a nice guy and a PUA anymore, since "The Game" has asked one very nasty question: "who is lying?" Are women really these skanks who **** guys in club bathrooms like the men say they are, or were they really innocent victims of these evil players? Something has to give now, since the women can't claim ignorance anymore. They either have to start ****ing the AFC men and "prove" that they were being conned by the players, OR they have to admit that they were lying all along and that they really do want these jerks, in which case their AFC harems will disappear, since no AFC is going to put a skank on a pedestal.
Got news for you folks: most of you aren't as intelligent as you think, aren't that creative, and are still relying on the old game to get ahead. That may have worked yesterday, and it might still work today, but the stuff that's working the best today and will continue to work the best tomorrow is stuff you haven't even heard yet, the stuff that will have you whining like the AFCs did when you stole their women from them. It just doesn't feel as nice to be on the losing side of the coin, now does it?