I’m confused, if the female imperative is to breed with the best men and secure provisions for self and the offspring, what does not falling into the female imperative mean? Not being one of the best men? Or being the best men but not providing for your offspring? Or being the best men, but dumping the mother of the offspring and taking on the sole responsibility of providing for the offspring?
Sazc does this confuse you too or is it just me lol.
I would like a separate thread to sort this out once and for all because there’s a lot of conflicting info on this and how it relates to modern day, which I’m sure it does to an extent but not sure how much and what the push back is really about. Just seems like it’s applied to every situation willy nilly doesn’t it?
it's just bvllchit that
@Ranger uses to shame men when they disagree or dont listen to what he posts
Essentially it's an outdated (50's) view of 'what women are subconsciously looking for'. In all actuality, lower status females fit
right in to the definition of feminine imperative. Of course lower status females are looking to breed up. If a man is so concerned with with preaching about sidestepping the feminine imperative, it is because he lives it, daily. He is surrounded with females that are motivated by it. This a man who is low SMV, sub par looks, socially awkward, low status, and the only females he attracts are low quality and looking for providers.
You dont hear guru or amante laboring on and on about the 'feminine imperative', do you? No. because they actually get it. They advise based on real world scenarios, and experiences, and have no need to validate their council by shaming anyone.
In any case
@AJ84 there will never be consensus on this site about what the feminine imperative actually is precisely because people will always distort it to support their own personal viewpoints. The color red, to me, might be a shade lighter or darker than what you see it.