jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
By "happy and content," it is meant that when she naturally feels the biological drive for genome differentiation—within a couple of years and at an unbearable level within 4 to 7 years (similar to how men feel)—she will be happy and content if she engraves herself into a false representation of herself and the reality of her inner experience.
They will be happy and content if they forcibly adhere to the "values" of some religion or culture that is unnatural for both. However, one should not assume that this is normal or beneficial.
They do not truly feel happy and content; they are doing it for a cause greater than themselves. The suffering of both those who claim to be "happy and content" often spills into their relationships, manifesting as acidity, contempt, and the feeling that the other person is their jailer, executioner, and the source of all their unhappiness and discontent. Sometimes this tension reverberates onto the smallest and weakest among them—at work, in life, or within their families. At times, it is kept inside, leading to internalized poison.
Keeping "the Hand in the Brazier"
Here we arrive at a crucial point. For some, the reason behind maintaining a long-term monogamous relationship—one that is unnatural and culturally imposed—must be genuinely significant. That’s fine. Whether it stems from religious beliefs, the need to feel part of a specific community embodying its dictates and values, or because they have been convinced through various channels that this is normal, it’s acceptable. They should be judged on their ability to keep their hand in the brazier while upholding the narrative of “they lived happily ever after.” Yet, I see many weak men devoid of a true Cause.
Let Me Explain Better
Whatever your reason for believing that a lifelong relationship with one woman—a relationship you consider a noble cause—justifies enduring discomfort, ask yourself:
- Why is this cause so trivial that you immediately withdraw your hand from the brazier if she instead touches it?
- Why does your "higher cause" cease to exist if she betrays you by being with another?
- Does only your pain matter? At the slightest discomfort, do you abandon the fight for that cause?
- What kind of higher Cause are you representing if at the first sign of pain you become angry, despairing, and run away?
- What Cause do you represent if you refuse to engage when there exists (and it is highly probable) a chance of burning yourself or her?
Consider why you actively oppose nature while following this Cause. You are not powerless; you can suppress natural urges for a reason greater than personal satisfaction. Yet, you are also manipulable like any rat; if your Cause—the reason for your actions—is not ironclad, then if your partner potentially gets contaminated, do you abandon the fight?
Reflect on Your Loyalties
Ask yourself more profound questions. Get angry; battle with yourself. You are serving two masters with opposing desires. You will love one and hate the other.
Examine where your loyalties lie: with your nature and species' essence or with a recent cultural construct that has failed?
Be cautious about why you are willing to sacrifice so much. If you are absolutely certain of the Cause you serve, keep your hand in the brazier and maintain a serious demeanor. If there are children watching, put on a smile.
One cannot heed someone who does not stand firm or who flees from the front line because his partner has been with another man—not if he claims, "this is my war."
It’s perfectly acceptable not to engage in battle or to retreat from the front line if you don’t believe it’s your war. Stop complaining about suffering or evading duty when pain is anticipated.
TLDR
If you believe in today’s societal construct that transcends our non-monogamous nature, fight back and defend your values while remaining aware of them. You must choose one master while acknowledging another's existence. One must recognize and suppress natural needs and impulses for what they believe in—the highest ideals they hold dear.
They will be happy and content if they forcibly adhere to the "values" of some religion or culture that is unnatural for both. However, one should not assume that this is normal or beneficial.
They do not truly feel happy and content; they are doing it for a cause greater than themselves. The suffering of both those who claim to be "happy and content" often spills into their relationships, manifesting as acidity, contempt, and the feeling that the other person is their jailer, executioner, and the source of all their unhappiness and discontent. Sometimes this tension reverberates onto the smallest and weakest among them—at work, in life, or within their families. At times, it is kept inside, leading to internalized poison.
Keeping "the Hand in the Brazier"
Here we arrive at a crucial point. For some, the reason behind maintaining a long-term monogamous relationship—one that is unnatural and culturally imposed—must be genuinely significant. That’s fine. Whether it stems from religious beliefs, the need to feel part of a specific community embodying its dictates and values, or because they have been convinced through various channels that this is normal, it’s acceptable. They should be judged on their ability to keep their hand in the brazier while upholding the narrative of “they lived happily ever after.” Yet, I see many weak men devoid of a true Cause.
Let Me Explain Better
Whatever your reason for believing that a lifelong relationship with one woman—a relationship you consider a noble cause—justifies enduring discomfort, ask yourself:
- Why is this cause so trivial that you immediately withdraw your hand from the brazier if she instead touches it?
- Why does your "higher cause" cease to exist if she betrays you by being with another?
- Does only your pain matter? At the slightest discomfort, do you abandon the fight for that cause?
- What kind of higher Cause are you representing if at the first sign of pain you become angry, despairing, and run away?
- What Cause do you represent if you refuse to engage when there exists (and it is highly probable) a chance of burning yourself or her?
Consider why you actively oppose nature while following this Cause. You are not powerless; you can suppress natural urges for a reason greater than personal satisfaction. Yet, you are also manipulable like any rat; if your Cause—the reason for your actions—is not ironclad, then if your partner potentially gets contaminated, do you abandon the fight?
Reflect on Your Loyalties
Ask yourself more profound questions. Get angry; battle with yourself. You are serving two masters with opposing desires. You will love one and hate the other.
Examine where your loyalties lie: with your nature and species' essence or with a recent cultural construct that has failed?
Be cautious about why you are willing to sacrifice so much. If you are absolutely certain of the Cause you serve, keep your hand in the brazier and maintain a serious demeanor. If there are children watching, put on a smile.
One cannot heed someone who does not stand firm or who flees from the front line because his partner has been with another man—not if he claims, "this is my war."
It’s perfectly acceptable not to engage in battle or to retreat from the front line if you don’t believe it’s your war. Stop complaining about suffering or evading duty when pain is anticipated.
TLDR
If you believe in today’s societal construct that transcends our non-monogamous nature, fight back and defend your values while remaining aware of them. You must choose one master while acknowledging another's existence. One must recognize and suppress natural needs and impulses for what they believe in—the highest ideals they hold dear.
