Mother gives 9-year-old girl how-to lessons in sex

[Francisco d'Anconia]

So oblivious to what you're saying.

"Christ" is right there in the sentence.

Look. Think.

Creepy? Is it? Is it "Creepy for Christ sakes."

Oh, and notice how you even capitalized "Christ"? You are pushing your religious beliefs and influences onto others whether you are aware of it or not.

Freudian slip and fall.

I understand what you are saying about sex, boobs et al; but come on, a 9 year old watching her folks have sex isn't educating her. Should children be taught about sexuality, absolutely but there are better ways to do it with kids her age.

Consider this, would you want to be operated on by someone who claims to be a doctor just because he watches the health channel on the weekends? Now what if the person was only 9 years old?

 

[Nighthawk]

Randy: Alright, now, now listen, kids. There's some things we need to put into context for you. You see, a man puts his penis into a woman's vagina for both love and pleasure. But sometimes the woman lays on top of the man facing the other way so that they can put each other's genitals in their mouths. Uh, this is called "sixty-nining" and it's normal.

Sharon: See boys, a woman is sensitive in her vagina and it feels good to have a man's penis inside of it.

Sheila: That's right, but sometimes a woman chooses to use other things. Telephones, staplers, magazines. It's because the nerve endings in the vagina are so sensitive, it's like a fun tickle.

Gerald: Now, onto double penetration, boys. You see, sometimes when a woman has sex with more than one man, each man makes love to a different orifice.

Randy: That's right. It's something adults can do with really good friends in a comfortable setting.

Sheila: It's also important that you understand why some people choose to urinate on each other.

Randy: Going #1 or #2 on your lover is something people might do, but you must make sure your partner is okay with it before you start doing it.

Gerald: Okay boys. Do you have any questions?

 

[spider_007]

"were"

"history"

"GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR AZZ."

thanks for correcting me bud, i don't know how i would ever live without you.:moon:

 

[spider_007]

Who said anyone was teaching the kid to be a "complete slut"? Do you not see that having a responsible and mature view of sex is contrary to being a slut? And, "be complete sluts"? Who's measure or gauge are using to determine if the woman is a "slut"? Again, you are imposing your beliefs. What's good for you might not be good for others

.

…and your right, my standards may be completely different then anybody else. What I might consider a whoooore, somebody else might consider a good girl. SO YOUR RIGHT. We should let terrorists go around killing people, after all, THAT’S WHAT THEY CONDSIDER NORMAL. There is a thin line in everything….and that line only moves when the whole society decides that they are comforatable with it……

How very acute of you to say that. What the military stands for? Then what exactly does "I am an American fighting soldier, fighting for America and it's way of life." actually mean if it doesn't imply "defending freedoms"?

There are rules to every organization, and they are there for a reason, If you don’t like them, don’t join.

It’s like saying why isn’t it a good idea to date the people you work with, after all it’s your choice. Can you see the parallel?????

Again, you didn't think past the obvious. The point is that you can display negativity towards other people legally, but can't display affection legally. The concept of "personal space" is exactly what this thread is about. The government is violating this couple's, and this child's, "personal space" and imposing views that can't be proven right or wrong.

Your trying to be politically correct, and things just don’t work that way. Almost avery society has a sweet spot when it comes to children. If I had the time and if I was willing I could probably quote a few sorcas as to why pedofilia is illegal….but I don’t.

Let me ask you this: Why do we even let children be raised by parents at all since, apparently, government has to care for society anyway? Why not send children to a government home to be raised in accordance with what it wants? It seems far more proactive.

My point is that the government isn't my babysitter. The government certainly has no place in telling me what to believe or think.

Your right to a point. However if everybody did what they wanted, and if there was no police, half of us would be dead by now, killed by our own stupidity.

Baondrys are being pushed all the time (in both directions)

 

[diplomatic_lies]

Hey Vulpine, just out of curiosity, do you agree with pedofilia? After all, you claim little kids should know about sex?

 

[ExploringOne]

Wtf Is Wrong With You People?

It's a 9 year old kid we're talking about here.

At most in the 3rd grade of school when this happened.

There are right ways of teaching, and there are wrong ways.

Typically you teach theory first. Then have a demonstration. The kid probably didn't understand entirely what was going on in front of her...

This kid was 9 years old when this came out. Now that makes me wonder, for how many years have the parents been $crewing in front of her?

As far as sex being a "natural" act. SO IS MURDER, SO IS DEATH. So are you gonna go whack a homeless guy to show your children how to murder? Are you going to take them to a funeral home to watch the whole embalming process? Dig up a grave to show decomposition? Take them to the hospital ER to watch some poor bastard buy the farm?

If these parents believed in teaching the child, fine, but actually teach first.

I don't know maybe it's just me, but if I ever see my parents go at it, I'm probably gonna be sick for a while afterwards.... Couldn't they just give the kid a dvd of amateur porn, and actually explain what's going on?

I don't know why there is even a question of how this is supposed to make one feel, it feels wrong.