Radharc said:
Hypothetical question for the guys who are saying it´s ok to hit on a woman with a bf because they are not married.
If the woman and the guy have a stable LTR, live together, but never "married" because they don´t care for paying to have their names on a piece of paper, is it ok then to hit on her?
I would have to say that the stability and deepness of the relationship would count. A girl and a guy that have gone out for a while, or are in a serious relationship would be downright wrong to cheat with.
On the other hand, if the relationship was old and warn out, or this girl had just dated some guy a few times, then it wouldn't be as bad if you cheated with her, but still probably morally wrong (to some extent).
It is like if a women is not (legally) divorced from a man, but seperated. If you hooked up with this women, that would be okay, as long as if the women and her boyfriend/husband mutually knew and agreed to seeing other people.
This girl is not this guy's possession, he's just her boyfriend. They aren't married, or engaged. There's no real commitment there (as you can see by the way she is acting). If I really wanted this girl I wouldn't let the boyfriend stop me.
You can interpret "another man's possession" however you want. It is like a legal code, you must interpret it to get its meaning, and the actual meaning is not set in stone. (of course, too many people on this message board are probably too stupid to know what that means, since you actually have to know law to know what interpreting a rule means).
But no, you shouldn't cheat with a women with a stable boyfriend husband.