jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
Mode One is a book that explains how having direct and confident behavior can serve as a filter for selecting women who have a high interest in you.
Not only does it differentiate women, categorizing them based on their behaviors (Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4), but it also explains that each mode corresponds to a different category of woman.
Furthermore, the book discusses the category of "real good girls," which constitutes a very small percentage—approximately 15-20% of the total. According to the author, these women are more likely to respond positively to Mode One. I have some real-life examples of men who exhibit Mode Two behavior and have attracted women with a "good girl" image, yet these women are actually promiscuous and unfaithful. Conversely, I also know men who behave in Mode One and have successfully attracted "good girl" types who are more centered and faithful.
That said, I believe the book is overly categorizing. Mode One, which involves being extremely direct, such as saying, "Come to my house on Friday night, I want to sleep with you" or "Get down on your knees and give me a *******", seems too blunt. Although the author suggests that good girls (the reciprocators) might respond positively to such directness, it doesn’t appear to align closely with reality.
So, what is the moral of this information? It likely helps men understand that their behavior and the way they express themselves will influence the type of woman they attract. This could also shed light on questions like "Why do I always attract broken women?" or "Why do I keep attracting the same type of women?"
Now, considering Mode One from a more human perspective, wouldn’t it be better to adopt a Mode 1.5 behavior? This would be a fusion of Modes One and Two.
I think the Author pov is too much black and white. Also, Mode 1 doesn't seem to be a good general behaviour in life if you want to achieve friendships, career success and other things. Does that make sense?
Not only does it differentiate women, categorizing them based on their behaviors (Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4), but it also explains that each mode corresponds to a different category of woman.
Furthermore, the book discusses the category of "real good girls," which constitutes a very small percentage—approximately 15-20% of the total. According to the author, these women are more likely to respond positively to Mode One. I have some real-life examples of men who exhibit Mode Two behavior and have attracted women with a "good girl" image, yet these women are actually promiscuous and unfaithful. Conversely, I also know men who behave in Mode One and have successfully attracted "good girl" types who are more centered and faithful.
That said, I believe the book is overly categorizing. Mode One, which involves being extremely direct, such as saying, "Come to my house on Friday night, I want to sleep with you" or "Get down on your knees and give me a *******", seems too blunt. Although the author suggests that good girls (the reciprocators) might respond positively to such directness, it doesn’t appear to align closely with reality.
So, what is the moral of this information? It likely helps men understand that their behavior and the way they express themselves will influence the type of woman they attract. This could also shed light on questions like "Why do I always attract broken women?" or "Why do I keep attracting the same type of women?"
Now, considering Mode One from a more human perspective, wouldn’t it be better to adopt a Mode 1.5 behavior? This would be a fusion of Modes One and Two.
I think the Author pov is too much black and white. Also, Mode 1 doesn't seem to be a good general behaviour in life if you want to achieve friendships, career success and other things. Does that make sense?
