Fortunate_Juan said:
I see your point, but harm is relative. His advice doesn't harm me. I am however an optimist, and try my hardest to find the best in everything.
Too bad. I am a realist and try to find optimism in good things and take as little bullsh1t from the negative as possible.
I am sure a bunch of racist groups and serial killers have only the best intentions. How absurd.
Read a psychology book sometime.
When you are done writing the mission statement of the website, please join the discussion where we hypothesize about women on a daily basis. The fact that we all post about what you wrote in italics (almost every day) is rediculous. Welcome to sosuave.net...
True. But most members ask questions and hypothesize based on experience, not on stuff they read in dusty textbooks form the middle ages.
What I said, which you took out of context, was that you need to sift through the advice and find things that help, leave things that don't.
Ah the blind leading the blind.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Yeah, but that doesn't mean its any good. If it breaks, buy a new watch. YIt would be foolish to take the time from a watch that is wrong (60sec*60mit*12hours-2sec=) 43,198 times a day. Just as it would be foolish to take advice from a dude who hasn't been able to use his own advice to get laid for the past 15-17 years.
I move to the neutral square in most arguments, due to the fact that I understand both sides of it.
That basically says you have no opinion. If you don't have one, don't get into a discussion. Go twiddle your thimbs elsewhere, or discuss on topics where you do have an opinion.
Then you continue to argue from one side or the other, and resort to a personal attack because you misunderstand my post.
I've been looking for this mythical personal attack you speak of. So far nothing is found. Post it please.
I am getting tired of having to put back in to context what you argue with me about.
Maybe you need to define what you are speaking about. Where is this context you speak of? And when did you put me in it?
Here is what I am arguing to make it clear:
1. Luke is very inexperienced (virgin). Does not know women. Should not give advice about such matters because it makes him a hypocrite.
2. His trying to give advice can hurt the people who actually heed it. There are many naive and new members who arrive here. Them taking advice from Luke not knowing his history may lead to mental anguish.
What are you arguing?