MGTOW = Men Sent Their Own Way, doomed to failure

NSX-R

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
1,220
Reaction score
819
Location
The land of improvement
To me MGTOW seems as a subversion of a beta male ideology . Beta males who’ve had their egos hurt and believe going their own way solves anything. By going their own way though they mean not asking a woman . That’s the funniest thing there is imo . And the funniest part is they believe it’s an Alpha trait .

Tell me when an Alpha cared if a woman/man was disrespectful to him . Never , cause to an alpha male with a strong frame everyone is submissive to him females or males .

MGTOW is like the far right of butthurted beta suckers
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
I guess the Royal Family is not helping things. You have a Queen but no King since King George died. Some weak looking Prince Charles under his 94 year old mother. Even Megan appears to be running the show and she is a divorcee too. Its just the top down. If there was a powerful King in England perhaps rather than a matriarchy there then that could serve as a role model to society.
 

Xenom0rph

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,923
Reaction score
2,460
Myself, I'm still MGTOW-Lite....but as I've stated in the past, I welcome criticism of MGTOW... And now I find myself criticizing MGTOW because it's been corrupted through monetization by these redpill "life coaches", they're every bit as bad as the PUA clowns from the early 2000s who now call themselves dating coaches.

Having spent time on incel message boards and youtube channels, I've come to respect the brutal truth of the blackpill. The blackpill may be harsh, but it's real and can't be corrupted because it cannot be monetized....

I've adopted a lot of incel philosophy EXCEPT their defeatist nature - this is one of the major things they get wrong. Even if the odds are stacked against you, as a man, you still have to stand up and fight even if it's a losing fight....

On that issue, redpill is correct, because redpill tells you not to surrender to circumstance....
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
@stormrider

How do you reconcile that Jesus completely owned his frame and didn't have a victim-mentality, yet he's known as the greatest victim or casualty of the government in History? Certainly, you're not claiming he brought that fate upon himself through his own "negative vibration," but rather it was something unjustly inflicted upon him.
Because there were many instances in scripture when people tried to stone Him or threw Him off a cliff but He would simply be able to walk away and nobody could touch Him. He willingly gave his life to pay for your sins so you have a lifelne to avoid being punished for all of your sins and going to hell. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world and His blood removes sin. If there was any other chance of you not ending up in hell apart from Him dying on the cross then the gospel would have ended at the garden of Gethsemany where Jesus asked the Father if there was any other possible way to save humanity then the cross would not be necessary. There was no other way therefore He died on the cross so those who believe in Him might escape hell and gonto heaven rather than everyone ending up in hell for breaking God's holy law at least once in their lives.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
Does History repeat itself?
Do not understand that question. I dont expect you to understand what I just wrote, unless the Lord is moving upon your heart, but you should at least have your facts straight if you are making a statement.
 

Jack12345

Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
758
Reaction score
428
If women can have the feminist movement, why can’t men have the MGTOW movement? I don’t agree with everything they are for, just like I don’t agree 100% with anything. Not gonna get butthurt about someone choosing how to live their life though.
You can still make fun of the name though. As if it was taken from a tears for fears song from the 80's
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,516
Reaction score
5,896
Hi Im looking for a thread where some men show off by bashing other men who for various reasons decided that relationships were not for them, any idea in which part of the site is?

Now seriously Im a mgtow, I think I described already my soft form of mgtow but I'll elaborate again.

I still bang women, I still date women and I sure still flirt with women so relax feel free to grab the soap that just felt.

What I dont do is to change my plans and schedule to accomodate women basically wheter we talk about that single day or long term.
Im not gonna skip the gym cause its friday and "cool people" go out to drink and I surely wont skip my MMA class on saturday morning cause I drunk on friday night and skipped breakfast nor cause cupcake wants to have a walk at the mall that afternoon.

Im not gonna get married or cohabitate for the laws we all know and for the fact that in my mid30s my desire for peace and independance is much stronger than my desire for sex or validation.

Am I an incel or a psyco? well maybe a lil bit of a psyco but surely not an incel since I've been banging women around europe since the 00s.
Confusing incels with mgtow is what women do (dumb women especially the ones with nose rings and blue hair), cause it makes them feel better and makes everything simple.
 

Robert28

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
5,432
You can still make fun of the name though. As if it was taken from a tears for fears song from the 80's
I’d have called it MDTOS. Men doing their own ****.lol
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
I was asking a question; not making a statement.

Revelation implies when Jesus returns, he will be crucified again, with several references.
No it does not. There is no such reference.
 

Peace and Quiet

If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.

Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.

This will quickly drive all women away from you.

And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,516
Reaction score
5,896
No, you’re not.




This does not make you “mgtow”. It makes you more likely to lead and women follow.




This does not make you mgtow. You’re just dedicated to your fitness.




This does not make you mgtow. It’s a common trait of abundance and independence.



This makes you mgtow.




This makes you mgtow.

Disdain for women. Angry at the laws. Blame.

You have not freed yourself. You just conformed to a new prison that suits your fears or frustrations.

I didn’t get married until I was 46. It wasn’t because women suck. It wasn’t because of the laws. It wasn’t because I am against marriage. It was because I had standards and screened ruthlessly until someone fit the bill, and I would have gone to my grave single if I didn’t.

I never heard of or needed mgtow. Didn’t need a movement. Didnt have to look down at women. Didn’t have to walk around proud of a label with a cute little acronym to go with it.
I dont need a movement either as much as I dont need a political party to have ideas, yet if it exist a party with ideas similar to mine I say that I share those principles.

Actually I would like to get married and have a family, its just that out western culture and law basically makes it a living hell by spoiling women and giving them god power anytime a conflict with men arises.

You said you got married at 46, can I ask you if you are still married or that same culture Im referring made it impossible to last?
Im not a celebrity or a top dog, Im a normal guy and I see normals guys and above average guys in terrible conditions in their marriages.

Btw Im not looking down on women as much as I dont look down on kids, yet I know what happens if Im working and they need attention while we are in the same room (dont take it literaly).
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
I've read Revelation 30+ times. How many times have you read it?
You have no reference. My reference is Hebrews 10:10. Says that He only came once for all sins.

I back up any statement that I make and dont pull things out of a hat.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
Revelation 11:8.

Besides, who said Christ has to die for Humanity's sins more than once? But does that mean he won't die more than once?
That verse is making a reference to a location where Jesus was crucified in the past. The wording on the verse says "where also our Lord WAS crucified". Jerusalem is also spiritually called Sodom and Egypt.

The reference is where the two witnesses die. The anti-christ and false prophet will kill these two witnesses in Jerusalem because of their witness against the anti-christ as being of the devil, and leading the world to worship the true God and away from that imposter (future political leader) who through signs and lying wonders makes outrageous claims to be god.

The identity of the two witnesses are not known, but some of speculated it could be Moses and Elijah since they were present with Jesus during His transfiguration, others may suggest Enoch and Elijah because neither prophet physically died in the Bible but went straight to heaven and this may be their first actual death, but that is a discussion on its own.

Therefore, you've taken this verse completely out of it's intended context to make a statement that is not there. It's like saying I visited a place in Japan where the nuclear bomb was dropped to mean that another nuclear bomb will drop in that place today. It's just a frame of reference to explain a location.

Nobody said that Christ has to die for Humanity's sins more than once. He will not die more than once. He has already defeated death and sin and His atoning sacrifice and blood is enough. It erases sins, it doesn't just cover them like the OT lamb sacrifices did on passover/day of atonement.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,516
Reaction score
5,896
You really don’t, and yet you identify with one.

Why?

I can answer that for you.

This is why:



This is what mgtow is. It’s not a men’s rights movement. As far as I know, they are not lobbying congressmen to change laws or raising money to help pay legal expenses or offering expertise for men going through ugly divorces. They are not offering resources to men financially ruined and struggling to pay rent on a sh*tty studio apartment. Have you donated to any such cause? Have you gathered signatures door to door to send mandated proposals to politicians?

If this is a movement, it’s a really sh*tty one because I don’t know of any such efforts, and I’m active and present in this “maosphere”. If I haven’t heard of it, I’m pretty sure guys who don’t even know what blue pill, red pill or mgtow even means will know about it either.

The whole thing is centered on disdain for women and embraces principles any healthy, solid man with his sh*t together should already have instilled within him.

There’s no need for this so called “movement”. It’s more like an AA meeting at best.
You are making big a big deal as if it was a non governative organization building paramilitary camps for training, its just an idea that many men share for different altough similar reasons.

I dont even bother to call my family for xmas, do I look like someone wearing a hood with the bros in a dark room while waving compasses to the sky?

It just happens that many guys in different countries came to the same conclusion in a cost-benefit evaluation and decided that a name that could fit such idea was men going their own way.

Each of those guys behave according to their will while sharing the core of the idea, some are total ghosts to society and women while others like me date casually and bang freely and any possible shade between the two.
 

ImTheDoubleGreatest!

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
5,775
Reaction score
2,974
Age
25
Location
Right behind you
@Amante Silvestre its pretty clear that you’re biased right now simply because you just got married. But they’re not attacking you or your wife, they’re just saying that the overwhelming majority of women are just not worth marrying. The fact that it took you 46 years to find a ‘good one’ is a testament to that, and I’m sure your own experiences with women are more than enough evidence to prove this already. All MGTOW says is, “hey, let’s look at Amante’s experience with women; out of all the women he’s talked to and dealt with, how many of them were actually marriage material? Only one. Out of thousands. In 46 years. Hmm, that doesn’t seem like good odds of finding a good woman. Well, what if we marry your average woman? I am facing a very high risk of divorce and cheating, along with mediocre sex if any at all, and when I get divorced, she will take everything. That doesn’t seem like good odds to me. I guess I’ll just stop looking for a wife.”

Then you, along with all the others here go ahead and say “haha virgin loser who can’t get laid, he’s so stupid that he let himself get divorce raped hahaha if you’re really that stupid to let yourself get divorce raped then you deserve to lose everything hahaha”. Like bruh.

Fact is, women *are* pretty messed up now, as is our divorce laws, and you’re all still out here saying “just be more alpha bro” but with different words. Lol.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
I didn’t get married until I was 46.
That is not the whole story, you've also had relationships/children and ended those relationships. If the relationship you were in before, had to end, and a child was involved, then isn't that a fail? You portray it as a success or win-win, but not everyone thinks a break-up, especially where children is involved is constructive because that could expose someone to child-support payments. If you got away with something in the legal system, concerning your children/break-up and are a happy camper then that might be the exception rather than the rule.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
No, it’s not a fail, because I refused marriage and planned for it to end back when it began. I selected her to give me children. I knew what she would end up becoming. I was prepared, so well that it all went off without a hitch really. I got everything. That didn’t happen by accident.
That just means you were lucky and are the exception to the rule. It doesn't mean you are disproving there is some sort of rule and that most guys are not lucky or are getting the raw end of the stick. It's like faulting the MTGOW and saying they are hiring the wrong defense lawyers for a divorce, if they had better legal representation, like I did, then it would invalidate the whole group, etc...

But I still find that mindset to be very bizarre and unfair on your child. It also not only shows you waited 46 y/o to find the right woman, but you also dealt with the wrong woman and had a child with her, no matter how you justify that. It's still russian roulette and we all know that's a stupid game. It also begs the question: Why couldn't you had your child with the woman you are married to now in a proper way?
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,793
Reaction score
3,743
There was no luck involved. I knew exactly what I had. I knew where it would go. I got exactly what I wanted out of it.

It was not luck. It was me utilizing a woman for a particular purpose. There was no illusion of love and happily ever after to death do us part. She was selected for birth, not as a mother or wife. I knew where I would be 5 years before I got there: a single dad. That’s why I didn’t get married. She fulfilled her role and I eventually moved on as expected.

That may seem cold and pragmatic, but I had control. I had a plan. That’s the difference. I didn’t do mgtow like things because a woman screwed up the plan and I was upset about it. I didn’t change what I did because I got stung. I just didn’t depend on a woman to play all roles.

Even the most flawed women can serve a useful purpose, but you have to know as a man how to assign that purpose, and more importantly, when not to expect more than what that woman can provide.

This is the mistake many men make. This is why they end up screwed. It’s not because women are inherently evil and the world is against you (although I will admit some are). It is because you depend too much on a woman to provide things they realistically cannot.

Mgtow guys learn this sh*t the hard way. They become independent through pain, and that leaves a bitter taste in the mouth that’s hard to get rid of.

I don’t blame them for feeling that way. But it’s not a movement. It’s just hindsight.

I did it with foresight for completely different reasons, ones that had nothing to do with women or stats.

Yes, I may be unique. That’s a shame. But it most definitely had nothing to do with luck.
I dont get why you would want a child and not a mother for your child. To each their own but you sound too atypical or like an outlier to a perfect mathematical equation.

MTGOW is for more normal people who wont date women so she can have a child. A normal average guy would not want a woman to bring a child unless the woman was at least mother material. More often the woman bring another guys child and claims the simp is the father or some nonsense like that.

It sounds like you want recogition that you are an exceptional person and if people are like you then MTGOW loses validity. But nobody willingly wants a child with any tramp.
 

ImTheDoubleGreatest!

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
5,775
Reaction score
2,974
Age
25
Location
Right behind you
I had this same stance right here on the forum before I even met my wife. Doesn’t really have anything to do with her or where I am in life right now.
Yeah and MGTOW didn’t really exist back then, so this point is moot.

Amante, everything else you said is you framing the same MGTOW principles in a ‘pick yourself up by the bootstraps’ kind of way while saying that it isn’t MGTOW. Then you bring your own conflicting paradigms to ‘prove’ to us that it’s true.

Exhibit A:
I didn’t get married until I was 46. It wasn’t because women suck. It wasn’t because of the laws. It wasn’t because I am against marriage. It was because I had standards and screened ruthlessly until someone fit the bill, and I would have gone to my grave single if I didn’t.
“It took me 46 years, but I found someone great and you can too! You just gotta keep looking.”
Yes, it may have taken me 46 years to get married, but I didn’t spend 46 years looking for a wife. I didn’t even entertain so much as a fleeting thought about it until I was 36. I didn’t think about it because I was out there living, traveling, trying new things, experiencing life in so many ways that settling down wasn’t even in my head.

...

I spent zero seconds in my first 36 years on this planet thinking, “This one isn’t wife material! What a wh0re!” They we’re merely toys. Fun bags. I had a mission. They were nothing more that the occasional break. I loved them. Enjoyed them. I worried about nothing mgtow men alter their life over.
“Well I didn’t actually look all my life, I just messed around with them till I was getting older and my band couldn’t get me any more hot babes. Once I did start actively looking, I found one (after 10 years)!”
It’s not hard to find someone when you’re not looking for or need someone who does it all.
“In fact, I didn’t even really look for a good quality woman at all, and THAT is when I found one. It’s always easy to find the right someone when you aren’t looking for them, isn’t it?”
~~~~
Pretty ironic to say the least.

Based off these posts, you can say that either you screened super hard and found the right woman after over a decade (or several) of searching, or you just happened to find one through luck. Or perhaps both.

You’re also forgetting to mention a lot of other important facts here:
  • You already had a boatload of experience with women due to having dreamy bad boy status from playing in a band.
    • This means that you already knew/understood how female nature was, unlike most men (since they did not have that experience).
  • You didn’t start to get serious till after the age most men get divorced.
    • This means that not only did you have a lot of sexual experience that allowed you to understand the nature of women, but you had also likely witnessed a lot of marriages that turned sour and ended in divorce [rape].
    • It also means you were around a lot of women who were going through a midlife crisis, many of whom were likely willing to cheat on their husbands with you, making it easy for you to see how risky marriage is.
  • You yourself never expected to find a good woman; if you did, you never would have had a child with a woman you knew you would have to cut off at some point
    • The fact that you even had to carefully plan out your steps 5 years in advance so as to not get screwed over in the court of law WHEN things went south (not if, WHEN...) is asinine as it is. But if that’s not enough, you explicitly stated in one of the above quotes that you were willing to die single if a woman didn’t measure up to your standards. I don’t know about you, but to me and the rest of us, that sounds like someone who knows how bad the female dating market is.
  • Lastly, we’ve all seen your pics bro. No homo or anything, but you’re honestly a very good-looking dude, far above average. Most dudes aren’t a 8 or 9 in looks. That alone puts you in the top 10% of men.
It’s easy to look down on others and shout ‘common sense’ at them if they had all the experiences you had, I mean anyone in your shoes would consider this stuff as ‘common sense’. But the fact is, not all of us have been in your shoes. Most men are like those dudes who ended up getting divorced and shafted in court while wishing they were still single like you. By the looks of it, you really did just get lucky in the gamble of life. Unless you planned all of this stuff out at the age of 10 or something. Not saying you didn’t work hard, I don’t know you to judge. But overall, you seem to be forgetting a lot of circumstance. And like @corrector said, no one plans to have a child without the mother involved, most people get married in order to have kids in the first place to create the best environment for their kids. You are DEFINITELY an outlier in your experiences bro

Edit: oh yeah I forgot to mention—the fact that your now-wife actually refused to take alimony payments from her former spouse is evidence enough that your case, the woman you’re with, etc. is not the norm. All the other stuff I mentioned is just extra. I don’t think there’s a woman alive who would refuse alimony except maybe your woman. So yeah. Just another reason to show how you’re life is an outlier compared to most.
My inner being is operating on a completely different wavelength.
You totally stole this from @stormrider lol
 
Last edited:

You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Top