Metrosexuality

[Joe The Homophobe]

you people are pathetic. I don't even want to know the next trend that the f@ggot fashion designers will make, and you will be all over that just like you are with the metrosexuality crap!

oh wait didn't somebody post a picture of what the fashion designers have in store for men? that pic of that weirdo with pink hair that looked like something outta a wizard of oz movie! and then the media will tell you that this is what women want and you will decide to lose your dignity by following what they say, just like you are losing your dignity being the radical feminists ideal man (a metrosexual)

 

[JonJack]

Originally posted by Joe The Homophobe
you people are pathetic. I don't even want to know the next trend that the f@ggot fashion designers will make, and you will be all over that just like you are with the metrosexuality crap!

oh wait didn't somebody post a picture of what the fashion designers have in store for men? that pic of that weirdo with pink hair that looked like something outta a wizard of oz movie! and then the media will tell you that this is what women want and you will decide to lose your dignity by following what they say, just like you are losing your dignity being the radical feminists ideal man (a metrosexual)

I am not even going to comment on how presumptuous this argument is. Add the fact that you actually labeled some of us pathetic.
*shakes head*

 

[MetalFortress]

Originally posted by diplomatic_lies
Finally, since I am not an aryan )or a redneck), I can't be a Nazi.

Hitler wasn't a redneck or an Aryan either, smart guy. Why don't you brush up on your history?

 

[MetalFortress]

Anyways, this whole war is hilarious. Here we have the moderates, the extremists, and the mega-metros - it's almost like politics! I say do what works for you, but don't do it to cater to women. Do it for yourself.

 

[Hound_of_Love]

Originally posted by PuertoRican_Lover
Riddle me this --- WHY IS THE WORD "SEXUAL" (suffix) in the word metro'sexual'???

It's a not-very-clever play on the word 'heterosexual' - see, it rhymes?!

It's not an etymologically constructed word, it's colloquial, so you can't read too much into its constituent parts.

Incidentally, did anyone ever get round to pointing out that there is a fairly fundamental distinction between the categories 'homosexual' and 'paedophile'?

 

[Don Juanabbe]

This metro sexual thing really is funny. It all started with David Beckham. The guy is completely effeminate.

However, there is a difference between a man who takes care of himself, and a man who ponces himself up like Beckham does.

I see men in nice looking business attire and they are clean cut etc. with decent haircuts and present themselves well without looking feminine. Nothing wrong with that.

However, Beckham has gone to the point where he is overly concerned with his hair, hell, the guy paints his nails. But this is not reality, and Beckham isn't part of our reality.

Tanning salons are silly. All this metrosexual crap is just a method for cosmetics companies to infiltrate and sell to the straight male demographic.

Want a tan? Go out and play football or "Soccer" in the sun or participate in some other sport.

When my skin is dry, guess what? I'll put moisturizer on it.

When I see a 2 inch long grey eyebrow hair, sorry, I'm plucking the bugger.

I am, however, not painting my toenails, getting highlights (don't need em, I've got natural ones anyway). Not putting my hair in corn rows, not carrying a 'man' bag.

Yeah, they big companies are trying to sell the 'made up man'. Is this gay? Probably a little.

You guys need to understand, that while PRL may be abrasive at times, he's not wrong.

Also, someone accused him of being racist - give me a break.

I see he's slowly being crucified, much like another member of this forum was. PRL's views may seem extreme to some of you, but some of the extreme homo-positive views on here also are extreme.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

Originally posted by Hound_of_Love
It's a not-very-clever play on the word 'heterosexual' - see, it rhymes?!

It's not an etymologically constructed word, it's colloquial, so you can't read too much into its constituent parts.

Incidentally, did anyone ever get round to pointing out that there is a fairly fundamental distinction between the categories 'homosexual' and 'paedophile'?

There are distinctions, yes, however, there seem to be an awful lot of young boys being abused these days, and mostly by men.

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

The homo mods have deleted 4 of mt posts on here -- the faggots hate the truth!!!

 

[Hound_of_Love]

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
There are distinctions, yes, however, there seem to be an awful lot of young boys being abused these days, and mostly by men.

There are also an awful lot of young girls being abused these days, and mostly by men. Which leads me to believe that (ta-ta-ta-tatara) paedophilia is not connected to homosexuality in any more concrete way than heterosexuality is.

 

[Freeman]

Originally posted by Brad324
About 6 months ago, working at a grocery store, I was called "metrosexual" by a co-worker because I decided to get blond highlights in my hair, got my hair professionally cut, and started going to a tanning salon. I have to tell you, after these changes, I have received at least twice as much attention from women as before. I was getting eye contact from women who I used to consider "out of my league," and I was the topic of the store for quite a while. As you could guess, while the women were calling me sexy, the guys were trying to label me fruity (who are we trying to attract anyways.) What's humorous is within the next month, 2 other guys at the store colored/highlighted their hair, and changed their styles to be more like mine. Interesting how these 2 were both trying to knock me for doing it earlier.

As of now I've only done the highlights thing and tanning, but considering giving men's skin care products a try.

At what point are you considered a metrosexual? And is it necessarily a negative thing? Would you consider using "Men's cosmetics" if you thought it would increase women's attraction for you, or would you not want to be considered "un-manly"? What about eyebrow plucking? Body hair waxing? Where do you draw the line, and is it for financial reasons? Insecurity? Fear? Or do you simply think it wouldn't help?

There's nothing wrong with a guy taking care of hisself. If dying your hair,getting manicures gets you more ladies then more power to you!

 

[TillTheEndOfTime]

Originally posted by MindOverMatter
I am sad to see so many guys here state that their game revolves around metrosexuality, or that they pull more girls simply because they are metrosexual. That is weak game! If you have to get in touch with your feminine side in order to pull women, you will never figure out how to pull them with masculinity.

Yes, the metrosexual approach can help you pull girls. But in the end it's counterproductive. At first the pretty boy image will pull girls, but eventually the looks novelty of a pretty boy wears off.

Once it wears off, sh!t like getting manicures, highlights, putting nivea on your face, carrying a vial of cologne with you everywhere you go, and getting waxes makes the girl stop seeing you as a masculine being, and it becomes a turnoff. That's why metrosexuals can pull women, but in the end they can't keep them, and end up losing them to real men.

Exactly. This is why metrosexual will only get the initial attention. Long term it is going to hurt you more than help you by denying your masculinity to appease woman short term.

Btw Interpol this thread alone is evidence that pleasing women is a driving force behind the metrosexual movement. Regardless of whatever you quoted (which was an incomplete quote as I showed) in my own thread.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

I'll tell you one thing. I look around these days, and something is definitely afoot.

I turned on the television the other day, only to flip through the channels and land on one of those 'specialty' channels, only to see a softcore gay porn going on - and this is prime time television. It wasn't graphic, but there were definitely two nude men, partially covered with sheets, going at it.

I screamed and flicked the channel over. Even my woman didn't like watching that sh*t. This channel was either Bravo or Showcase, I forget which one.

Some of their other shows included the hor promoting Sex in the City.

Their latest masterpiece is the "L-Word" another show promoting lipstick lesbianism.

Then I get on the subway and there are ads all over the train advertising a dating/hoookup service or website or some other for gay men. This ad shows three effeminate looking dudes on it.

Also, obviously someone had been handing out little postcards for this business, because I saw them scatted all over the Subway station floor.

This morning, I saw a different ad, for yet another gay hookup network, and it showed a dude that looked like the leather guy from the Village people lying in bed with some other dude.

Ok, so homosexuals make up around a little under 2% of the population, yet we are being inundated everywhere by their lifestyle.

Someone care to argue that there is no conspiracy afoot, especially when they're slowly pushing gay behaviour in the form of metrosexuality?

I believe the method they are using is called slowly desensitizing the public. Once you start to get used to seeing these images, it will only start getting worse as this sh*t becomes slowly more acceptable.

I can see by some of the posters on here that this is already happening.

How does a very small minority group of people gain such a loud voice.

I'll tell you something, through work, I've met a lot of gay men. 9 out of 10 of them lead extremely f*cked up lifestyles.

Two in particular I can think of claim they've been together for 15 years, yet one of them is fooling around with some old guy, and the younger one mysteriously shows up with another guy claiming it's his cousin, but it ain't. Both are HIV positive, both have had hundreds of sex partners.

What do I tell my son when he sees two men kissing on network television, that it's normal? No way pal.

 

[TillTheEndOfTime]

When the woman realizes she has made another girlfriend and not boyfriend with the metrosexual, she will become uneasy and leave. Her true nature seeks a man with masculine traits to complete her, not another woman.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

Originally posted by Hound_of_Love
There are also an awful lot of young girls being abused these days, and mostly by men. Which leads me to believe that (ta-ta-ta-tatara) paedophilia is not connected to homosexuality in any more concrete way than heterosexuality is.

I'd be willing to bet you that the numbers involving men on boy are much larger.

Look at the coverups involving the Catholic church. Look at the coverups in the boyscouts, in coaching.

In Toronto, there was a whole ring of child abuse - male on male, at Maple Leaf Gardens that went on for years and years. Everyone turned a blind eye to it. But it happened to many boys.

It all came out in the media, but the gay aspect of it was played down.

Then there was the case of the boys hockey coach who molested several youth hockey players, amongst them a few NHLers. They came out with this lovely tidbit a few years ago.

Naw, nothing to see here.

It's just kept under media wrap so as not to go against the shiny happy portrayel of gay men we get in the media in the form of Will & Grace.

As I said, I've met tonnes of gay men through my work, and most of them lead very, very screwed up lifestyles.

This isn't to say I hate gays, I don't, I have an old friend from high school who ended up that way, he's an alright dude, but even he leaves a messed up life. He's a decent sort, but I don't want to hang out with the guy or anything.

 

[whistler]

One:

Metrosexuality sells.

Just look at this thread.


Two:

Basic grooming is one thing, and it's reasonable and expected.

The more over-the-top, recent girly trends are not.
Just like homosexuality, it reduces the competition. I'm sure society will snap back toward the manly direction soon enough. In the meantime, it's a gift to the guys that aren't metrosexuals.

 

[TillTheEndOfTime]

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
I'll tell you one thing. I look around these days, and something is definitely afoot.

I turned on the television the other day, only to flip through the channels and land on one of those 'specialty' channels, only to see a softcore gay porn going on - and this is prime time television. It wasn't graphic, but there were definitely two nude men, partially covered with sheets, going at it.

I screamed and flicked the channel over. Even my woman didn't like watching that sh*t. This channel was either Bravo or Showcase, I forget which one.

Some of their other shows included the hor promoting Sex in the City.

Their latest masterpiece is the "L-Word" another show promoting lipstick lesbianism.

Then I get on the subway and there are ads all over the train advertising a dating/hoookup service or website or some other for gay men. This ad shows three effeminate looking dudes on it.

Also, obviously someone had been handing out little postcards for this business, because I saw them scatted all over the Subway station floor.

This morning, I saw a different ad, for yet another gay hookup network, and it showed a dude that looked like the leather guy from the Village people lying in bed with some other dude.

Ok, so homosexuals make up around a little under 2% of the population, yet we are being inundated everywhere by their lifestyle.

Someone care to argue that there is no conspiracy afoot, especially when they're slowly pushing gay behaviour in the form of metrosexuality?

I believe the method they are using is called slowly desensitizing the public. Once you start to get used to seeing these images, it will only start getting worse as this sh*t becomes slowly more acceptable.

I can see by some of the posters on here that this is already happening.

How does a very small minority group of people gain such a loud voice.

I'll tell you something, through work, I've met a lot of gay men. 9 out of 10 of them lead extremely f*cked up lifestyles.

Two in particular I can think of claim they've been together for 15 years, yet one of them is fooling around with some old guy, and the younger one mysteriously shows up with another guy claiming it's his cousin, but it ain't. Both are HIV positive, both have had hundreds of sex partners.

What do I tell my son when he sees two men kissing on network television, that it's normal? No way pal.

I an affirm this post. Gay men in general, are very, very promiscuous and leave very questionanle lifestyles. The ones I've met, spoke to and heard about are horny as hell. One of them was practically undressing me with his eyes just as I spoke to him.

Go into a straight club and you'll see the usual guy trying to grind or dance it up with a hot chick, but being cautious to see if she is accepting it.

Go to a gay club and you'll have other guys putting their hands down your pants in minutes. Gay people I have spoken to told me this themselves.

Maybe not all gays are like this, but a quite a few are.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

Originally posted by TillTheEndOfTime
I an affirm this post. Gay men in general, are very, very promiscuous and leave very questionanle lifestyles. The ones I've met, spoke to and heard about are horny as hell. One of them was practically undressing me with his eyes just as I spoke to him.

Go into a straight club and you'll see the usual guy trying to grind or dance it up with a hot chick, but being cautious to see if she is accepting it.

Go to a gay club and you'll have other guys putting their hands down your pants in minutes. Gay people I have spoken to told me this themselves.

Maybe not all gays are like this, but a quite a few are.

I would say a good portion of them are. They sleep around like mad and this is the reason their community is being decimated by HIV.

Yet lo and behold, I don't see the threat that we've been hearing for years that the straight community is going to start getting HIV in epidemic proportions coming to fruitition.

Funny that, isn't it?

This fearmongering about straights getting HIV in greater proportions than the gay community simply has not happened.

Very interesting.

 

[whistler]

There's probably only one reliabe difference between gay guys and straight guys:

Gay guys are sexually attracted to men.


Obviously they're probably more sexual. What their lifestyle demonstrates is sex without the gatekeeper/speedbump that is a female.

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

SoSuave is run by homos!!!!! Corrupting your mind!! Say "No" to advice from homos!!!!

 

[Interpol]

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
I'd be willing to bet you that the numbers involving men on boy are much larger. It's just kept under media wrap so as not to go against the shiny happy portrayel of gay men we get in the media in the form of Will & Grace.

Have you been living under a rock the past year? The biggest non-political news story recently has been the Michael Jackson trial - a "man on boy" pedophilia case.

Just a question for all of you who buy into this grand homo conspiracy theory - who is running the show? The owners of most major corporations in the world (not just media or advertising, all major corporations) are white, straight men. Not feminists. Not homos.

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
Then I get on the subway and there are ads all over the train advertising a dating/hoookup service or website or some other for gay men. This ad shows three effeminate looking dudes on it.

Also, obviously someone had been handing out little postcards for this business, because I saw them scatted all over the Subway station floor.

This morning, I saw a different ad, for yet another gay hookup network, and it showed a dude that looked like the leather guy from the Village people lying in bed with some other dude.

Ok, so homosexuals make up around a little under 2% of the population, yet we are being inundated everywhere by their lifestyle.

From the context of your post, it is clear you live in a major metropolitan area - a place where gays make up much more than 2% of the population. Take a drive through rural Kentucky (where the gay population is much, much lower) and see how many gay-targeted billboards you see.

These advertisements you see aren't public service announcements; they're a a company attempting to market their product. When you consider how many advertising messages we are confronted with on a daily basis (studies place this number at over 1000), the few examples you mentioned are not statistically signifigant.

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
I see he's slowly being crucified, much like another member of this forum was. PRL's views may seem extreme to some of you, but some of the extreme homo-positive views on here also are extreme..

PRL is crucifying himself through his inability to make any coherent, logical arguments.