Met a (Speed?) Seductress

[George Gordon]

Though I gave up studying SS over half a year ago, it was an underlining ‘theme’ last Friday, Halloween. I was at a house party, sitting at the kitchen table, squinting with a downcast and pensive wrinkled eyebrow expression on, trying to keep myself from falling asleep, exhausted from a long night at a club earlier, when this girl comes up to me whom I’d had a brief conversation with earlier. As it turns out, I had never met a woman who talked so seductively—unless it was a complete coincidence, but I think I’d sooner win the lottery by finding a ticket on the ground.

As she began to talk, I noticed while she talked about her last weekend (being at a party, in a non-sociable mood), she was pacing my exact mood and circumstance. She continued to talk, and my eye contact locked on, in ‘trance’ I might almost admit (perhaps with a slovenly doggy-dinner bowl look), as she began to start leading my state to a different place.

I hadn’t even thought about SS in months until I realized what she was doing was so familiar. She had my curiosity when it struck me she was seducing me, so subtly. And I let her carry on, just to see what else she had up her sleeve.

Basically, she had every base covered; she knew the progression: comfort, attraction, and sexual acceleration. Very interesting. It seemed innate, natural like she wasn’t even conscious of it. She pressed all the right buttons. No patterns, but through her personal stories. Her experience. How she lead my thoughts. This woman knew how to instinctively relate, communicate, and connect.


Either women are excellent seductresses when they want to be or I was irresistibly attractive sitting there like a lone romantic hero, because about half a dozen women came-on to me, or hinted (you know brushing up against me as they sling there jackets over the back of MY chair: sorry, excuse me). Gawd! These women just don’t want to leave you alone when you sit down for half an hour to recuperate, spending some time figuring out what you need to do during the weekend.

!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[Ice Cold]

So why the hell didn't you let her force you to kiss her?

No patterns, but through her personal stories. Her experience.

hehehe

Personal stories. They ARE patterns.


What did she say to you?

 

[Dell SkyCat]

Originally posted by George Gordon
Though I gave up studying SS over half a year ago, it was an underlining ‘theme’ last Friday, Halloween. I was at a house party, sitting at the kitchen table, squinting with a downcast and pensive wrinkled eyebrow expression on, trying to keep myself from falling asleep, exhausted from a long night at a club earlier, when this girl comes up to me whom I’d had a brief conversation with earlier. As it turns out, I had never met a woman who talked so seductively—unless it was a complete coincidence, but I think I’d sooner win the lottery by finding a ticket on the ground.

As she began to talk, I noticed while she talked about her last weekend (being at a party, in a non-sociable mood), she was pacing my exact mood and circumstance. She continued to talk, and my eye contact locked on, in ‘trance’ I might almost admit (perhaps with a slovenly doggy-dinner bowl look), as she began to start leading my state to a different place.

I hadn’t even thought about SS in months until I realized what she was doing was so familiar. She had my curiosity when it struck me she was seducing me, so subtly. And I let her carry on, just to see what else she had up her sleeve.

Basically, she had every base covered; she knew the progression: comfort, attraction, and sexual acceleration. Very interesting. It seemed innate, natural like she wasn’t even conscious of it. She pressed all the right buttons. No patterns, but through her personal stories. Her experience. How she lead my thoughts. This woman knew how to instinctively relate, communicate, and connect.


Either women are excellent seductresses when they want to be or I was irresistibly attractive sitting there like a lone romantic hero, because about half a dozen women came-on to me, or hinted (you know brushing up against me as they sling there jackets over the back of MY chair: sorry, excuse me). Gawd! These women just don’t want to leave you alone when you sit down for half an hour to recuperate, spending some time figuring out what you need to do during the weekend.

!GEORGE GORDON!

Women do this naturally, even before SS I didn't even realize how intuitive women really are, at least some to a greater and lesser extent. I know women that kino me, pace me, trance words me, do me, and 'seductive'. Apparently your 'mood' was obvious through your countenance. I wouldn't be too surprised if it was both of the things you wonder about. If whether women are excellent seductresses AND they found you irresistable attractive. Oh and one more thing, after thinking about it, I think it's only a certain kind that are more influential in thier 'Speed Seduction'

 

[Ricky]

What became of it. I would let just about any girl pull that on me!

 

[George Gordon]

Originally posted by Ice Cold
Personal stories. They ARE patterns.

Hey Ice Cold Sure. Everything's a pattern. I'm not a scientist though.

I consider 'patterns', when discussed on this forum, to be rehearsed, like pick-up lines on morphine. Whereas she was simply communicating on a 'higher level'.

Originally posted by Dell Skycat
Apparently your 'mood' was obvious through your countenance. I wouldn't be too surprised if it was both of the things you wonder about. If whether women are excellent seductresses AND they found you irresistable attractive.

Hi Dell Skycat. Interesting. I considered the same thing. It's a dance: when you have the right steps, the woman can follow and reveal their seductiveness; whereas Nice Guys dont't know the steps and trip all over the place, not allowing the woman to dance because she's obviously more concerned about not getting stepped on.

Originally posted by Ricky
What became of it. I would let just about any girl pull that on me![/B]

What became of it Ricky? Well. When you're a Prince, you can't afford to have every woman at a party hitting on you, especially when you have to consider negotiations which have to be attended to in court the next day. Women are such distractions from things that matter.

After she started getting into the sexual stuff, I busted her on it: Do you always talk this seductively, or is it because you're talking to ME? Then she turned into my five year old daughter whom I just caught with her hand in my majestic cookie jar.

!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[iqqi]

hmmmm.....

i find george gordon fascinating.

Originally posted by George Gordon
Well. When you're a Prince, you can't afford to have every woman at a party hitting on you, especially when you have to consider negotiations which have to be attended to in court the next day. Women are such distractions from things that matter.

After she started getting into the sexual stuff, I busted her on it: Do you always talk this seductively, or is it because you're talking to ME? Then she turned into my five year old daughter whom I just caught with her hand in my majestic cookie jar.

!GEORGE GORDON!

fascinating.

 

[George Gordon]

Originally posted by iqqi
hmmmm.....

i find george gordon fascinating.



fascinating.

Hi iqqi. I haven't come across you before, but you must be a woman because, for one, it seems women never make use of their shift key--even English professors--(it should be right left of the Z-key on your keyboard) and I always get either the 'fascinating' or 'mysterious' comments from women. This usually happens when I rarely 'rescue' the poor damsel in distress from boring conversations with AFC peasants, yet I give them the 'I know exactly how bored you are not talking to royalty'-look. Finally when they weasel out of the peasant's gutter, they notice the red carpet, and, NATURALLY, find me at the end of it, and woo my like I'm a king, but I'm merely a Prince. Currently.

My reality just happens to be woman's fantasy.

!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[Ice Cold]

The content of the stories is rehearsed. She just say something like: "when I was this" or "my friend told me that..." and after that comes the reversed pattern with a definite goal in mind.

Cheers

 

[BobbDobbs]

Originally posted by George Gordon
I haven't come across you before

Oooh, nice embedded NLP pattern.

 

[George Gordon]

Originally posted by Ice Cold
The content of the stories is rehearsed. She just say something like: "when I was this" or "my friend told me that..." and after that comes the reversed pattern with a definite goal in mind.

Ice Cold, I studied NLP and SS for months. Years ago. And, in my case with this 'seductress', there were no weasel phrases. NLP and SS techniques are (or should be) tools, training wheels to expanding your communication and 'seduction' understandings. Like any 'trick', they can lead you to a greater understanding if you don't get caught up in them as a science. However, she was conversing in a natural state, she wasn't acting--except on her listing lust for me.

Originally posted by BobbDobbs
Oooh, nice embedded NLP pattern.

BobbDobbs. I remember when I was into NLP and SS, everything was perceived through that filter; everything was stiff and corrugated. Science: attempting to put Miss Elusive Nature into a box and tag her with 'constants' as if she were a mathematical equation.

People have pointed out to me that I often speak in sexual metaphors (along with others) and innuendos before, yet I am always unaware of it until they bring it to my attention. It's natural, as discourse and communication should be. Primal. Illuminating from the want, not focusing on the diction, those persuasion scripts. Sure, there are trends in free-flow, and scientists seem so inclined to concoct a technology out of it . . . Something tangible, yet they inhibit themselves from actually FEELING what is happening because they're too busy analyzing data into catagories and charts. I've been there before and it was HELL.

!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[Sax God]

I get the impression that you're either incredibly confidents or a really good B.S.er. Which is it? I think I already know the answer, though.

 

[Satan Psycho]

Funny you should bring this up. I remember a camping trip where a middle-aged woman, I think, sarged my friend with some language. They were camping at the site next to us and came over and joined us. I didn't want them there because they looked about 50, pair-shaped bodies ravaged by age and childbirth, and had NO sex appeal whatsoever. I remember one of them starting describing something, I can't remember what it was, I think it was something like eating a hotdog (we always made campfire dogs). If she wasn't consciously using NLP then she must have been a natural seductress. Anyway, since I was aware of what she was doing (not to mention shocked and amazed) it didn't affect my unconscious mind. But on the next camping trip the subject came up and said friend related to me that he had let that middle-aged woman - with zero sex appeal - suck his c0ck after I went to sleep. The more I think about how she was talking, the more I think she must have been consciously using NLP. Hey, maybe there's a board like this for horny middle-aged hags.

Originally posted by BobbDobbs
Oooh, nice embedded NLP pattern.

I wonder if you actually know how true that is. That would be a great sexual metaphor for some nice patterning.

 

[B9]

Hmmm, I do like your style !Gx2!

Seeing as how you don't dabble with SS much anymore, I wonder what your views are on it now. I've been thinking about trying them out for field training.

 

[George Gordon]

I know, isn't my style regal?

B9

Originally posted by B9
Seeing as how you don't dabble with SS much anymore, I wonder what your views are on it now. I've been thinking about trying them out for field training.

I have nothing against experimentation. As long as you absorb what it can offer you, then let it seep out.

However, SS, to me (like NLP) is too mathematical, in my opinion--I think I stated this above somewhere. It's an equation:

Comfort Pattern + Connection Pattern + Sexual Arousal Pattern = Sex Hooray!


The problems I saw with SS were with the lack of 'connection/imtimacy':

1) It had NOTHING to do with ME (or US); The experiences were all the target's regurgitated memories arranged into that equation, then linked to me. It's all stinky vomit.

2) The 'relationship' or interactions were souless. It was phony. I want those 'stages' to occur naturally BETWEEN us, not just in her 'NOSTALGIA'. I want commonality where it's warranted and genuine.

3) Sex was the trophy. The goal was surface level. I want the whole experience, the whole 'progression', to be lived for each moment; the binding together of one whole.


!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[NINJA PIMP]

Originally posted by George Gordon
My reality just happens to be woman's fantasy.

Hah! GG you arrogant bastard. You sound just like me!

Listen to this man fellas. Just having this mentality alone will get you chicks without you even having to try.

Excellent attitude!

As long as you truly believe it.

 

[B9]

Cheers, !Gx2!

.

 

[George Gordon]

Re: Cheers, !Gx2!

Originally posted by B9
.

You got a point there.

!Gx2!

 

[MackJr]

Gordon,

once you learned SS/NLP, did you success level go up, at least as far as surface-level f*cking is concerned? From what you say, it might be a good relationship opener if nothing else.

 

[George Gordon]

Originally posted by MackJr
once you learned SS/NLP, did you success level go up, at least as far as surface-level f*cking is concerned? From what you say, it might be a good relationship opener if nothing else.

MackJr,

Seduction is woman's domain. But because the Nice Guy Syndrome is so prevalent these days, it can be difficult to see the truth in this. Seducers are feminine men; they're SEXUAL, but lack VISION.

NLP allowed me to see what natural instinct and seductive genius women actually possess. Similar to the original post in this thread, I've come to encounter so many similar circumstances, which I probably wouldn't have noticed had I not studied SS. That, seems to the only use I've found for SS. But why would you want to take yourself further and further into woman's world?

I wrote a paper on this for English class, and have since tweaked it to reflect the issues of this site. I may post it yet. My one experience may be very eye-opening for some people. I was taken aback--actually it has to do with my English Prof.

!GEORGE GORDON!

 

[iqqi]

Originally posted by George Gordon
Seducers are feminine men; they're SEXUAL, but lack VISION.

u should post that paper, because i don't think i agree with that statement, i 'd like to hear your ideas and why you think that.