Men Just Want Mommy

BadBoy89

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
2,135
Article about Men Wanting Mommy.

-------------------------------------------------

A few years ago at a White House Correspondents' dinner, I met a very beautiful actress. Within moments, she blurted out: "I can't believe I'm 46 and not married. Men only want to marry their personal assistants or P.R. women."


I'd been noticing a trend along these lines, as famous and powerful men took up with the young women whose job it was to tend to them and care for them in some way: their secretaries, assistants, nannies, caterers, flight attendants, researchers and fact-checkers.

Women in staff support are the new sirens because, as a guy I know put it, they look upon the men they work for as "the moon, the sun and the stars." It's all about orbiting, serving and salaaming their Sun Gods.

In all those great Tracy/Hepburn movies more than a half-century ago, it was the snap and crackle of a romance between equals that was so exciting. Moviemakers these days seem far more interested in the soothing aura of romances between unequals.

In James Brooks's "Spanglish," Adam Sandler, as a Los Angeles chef, falls for his hot Mexican maid. The maid, who cleans up after Mr. Sandler without being able to speak English, is presented as the ideal woman. The wife, played by Téa Leoni, is repellent: a jangly, yakking, overachieving, overexercised, unfaithful, shallow she-monster who has just lost her job with a commercial design firm. Picture Faye Dunaway in "Network" if she'd had to stay home, or Glenn Close in "Fatal Attraction" without the charm.

The same attraction of unequals animated Richard Curtis's "Love Actually," a 2003 holiday hit. The witty and sophisticated British prime minister, played by Hugh Grant, falls for the chubby girl who wheels the tea and scones into his office. A businessman married to the substantial Emma Thompson falls for his sultry secretary. A writer falls for his maid, who speaks only Portuguese.

(I wonder if the trend in making maids who don't speak English heroines is related to the trend of guys who like to watch Kelly Ripa in the morning with the sound turned off?)

Art is imitating life, turning women who seek equality into selfish narcissists and objects of rejection, rather than affection.

As John Schwartz of The New York Times wrote recently, "Men would rather marry their secretaries than their bosses, and evolution may be to blame."

A new study by psychology researchers at the University of Michigan, using college undergraduates, suggests that men going for long-term relationships would rather marry women in subordinate jobs than women who are supervisors.

As Dr. Stephanie Brown, the lead author of the study, summed it up for reporters: "Powerful women are at a disadvantage in the marriage market because men may prefer to marry less-accomplished women." Men think that women with important jobs are more likely to cheat on them.

"The hypothesis," Dr. Brown said, "is that there are e Women, by contrast, did not show a marked difference in their attraction to men who might work above or below them. And men did not show a preference when it came to one-night stands.

A second study, which was by researchers at four British universities and reported last week, suggested that smart men with demanding jobs would rather have old-fashioned wives, like their mums, than equals. The study found that a high I.Q. hampers a woman's chance to get married, while it is a plus for men. The prospect for marriage increased by 35 percent for guys for each 16-point increase in I.Q.; for women, there is a 40 percent drop for each 16-point rise.

So was the feminist movement some sort of cruel hoax? The more women achieve, the less desirable they are? Women want to be in a relationship with guys they can seriously talk to - unfortunately, a lot of those guys want to be in relationships with women they don't have to talk to.

I asked the actress and writer Carrie Fisher, on the East Coast to promote her novel "The Best Awful," who confirmed that women who challenge men are in trouble.

"I haven't dated in 12 million years," she said drily. "I gave up on dating powerful men because they wanted to date women in the service professions. So I decided to date guys in the service professions. But then I found out that kings want to be treated like kings, and consorts want to be treated like kings, too."

-----------

Thoughts?
 

The Duke

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
5,638
Reaction score
8,581
Men have always valued nurturing, caring, submissiveness, compassion, and supporting traits in women. Women that want to climb the corporate ladder and subscribe to feminist ideals tend to lack most all of those things I listed. Thats why a masculine man has little use for them.

I have never met a woman that I could be open with and trust like I could a man. Thats why you can't talk to them. They draw false conclusions and get things twisted due to their insecurities and fragile minds. Its why we always say here its pointless to argue with them, don't discuss redpill concepts, don't tell them about SoSuave.

As the years go by, the more I view MGTOW/Incels as the male equivalent to FEMINISM. Both sides are angry, delusional, failing, and refuse to adapt and improve so they are more marketable. Instead, they stick to their disgruntled viewpoints and blame their shortcomings on everyone else.
 
Last edited:

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
13,506
Reaction score
11,366
As the years go by, the more I view MGTOW/Incels as the male equivalent to FEMINISM. Both sides are angry, delusional, failing, and refuse to adapt and improve so they are more marketable. Instead, they stick to their disgruntled viewpoints and blame their shortcomings on everyone else.
It makes a lot of sense to consider MGTOW/incel as the male equivalent to feminism. It's a viewpoint that I share.

Men have always valued nurturing, caring, submissiveness, compassion, and supporting traits in women. Women that want to climb the corporate ladder and subscribe to feminist ideals tend to lack most all of those things I listed. Thats why a masculine man has little use for them.
Yes, this is correct. It's usually apparent by the end of a first date with a female lawyer, doctor/dentist, or ambitious businesswoman.

There was one time where I went on a date with a female lawyer against my better judgment. I had zero interest in offering her a 2nd date. She was telling me a story about how she had spent the previous Thanksgiving Day working on a major work project. I have no interest in having a girlfriend who does office work on Thanksgiving Day as a girlfriend. I would rather be alone. It would be more understandable if she were a physician working in a medical emergency room on a major holiday, but I'm also generally not interested in female physicians who work on major holidays either.

Women's career achievements in high powered careers are rarely sexual turn-ons for men. That is even true for beta males, who are less likely to admit that. I see myself as a sigma male (the reason why I have the lone wolf avatar) and alpha/sigma types are even less attracted to high powered careerist women who often hold strong feminist viewpoints.
 

AmsterdamAssassin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2023
Messages
7,012
Reaction score
6,086
Article about Men Wanting Mommy.

-------------------------------------------------

A few years ago at a White House Correspondents' dinner, I met a very beautiful actress. Within moments, she blurted out: "I can't believe I'm 46 and not married. Men only want to marry their personal assistants or P.R. women."


I'd been noticing a trend along these lines, as famous and powerful men took up with the young women whose job it was to tend to them and care for them in some way: their secretaries, assistants, nannies, caterers, flight attendants, researchers and fact-checkers.

Women in staff support are the new sirens because, as a guy I know put it, they look upon the men they work for as "the moon, the sun and the stars." It's all about orbiting, serving and salaaming their Sun Gods.

In all those great Tracy/Hepburn movies more than a half-century ago, it was the snap and crackle of a romance between equals that was so exciting. Moviemakers these days seem far more interested in the soothing aura of romances between unequals.

In James Brooks's "Spanglish," Adam Sandler, as a Los Angeles chef, falls for his hot Mexican maid. The maid, who cleans up after Mr. Sandler without being able to speak English, is presented as the ideal woman. The wife, played by Téa Leoni, is repellent: a jangly, yakking, overachieving, overexercised, unfaithful, shallow she-monster who has just lost her job with a commercial design firm. Picture Faye Dunaway in "Network" if she'd had to stay home, or Glenn Close in "Fatal Attraction" without the charm.

The same attraction of unequals animated Richard Curtis's "Love Actually," a 2003 holiday hit. The witty and sophisticated British prime minister, played by Hugh Grant, falls for the chubby girl who wheels the tea and scones into his office. A businessman married to the substantial Emma Thompson falls for his sultry secretary. A writer falls for his maid, who speaks only Portuguese.

(I wonder if the trend in making maids who don't speak English heroines is related to the trend of guys who like to watch Kelly Ripa in the morning with the sound turned off?)

Art is imitating life, turning women who seek equality into selfish narcissists and objects of rejection, rather than affection.

As John Schwartz of The New York Times wrote recently, "Men would rather marry their secretaries than their bosses, and evolution may be to blame."

A new study by psychology researchers at the University of Michigan, using college undergraduates, suggests that men going for long-term relationships would rather marry women in subordinate jobs than women who are supervisors.

As Dr. Stephanie Brown, the lead author of the study, summed it up for reporters: "Powerful women are at a disadvantage in the marriage market because men may prefer to marry less-accomplished women." Men think that women with important jobs are more likely to cheat on them.

"The hypothesis," Dr. Brown said, "is that there are e Women, by contrast, did not show a marked difference in their attraction to men who might work above or below them. And men did not show a preference when it came to one-night stands.

A second study, which was by researchers at four British universities and reported last week, suggested that smart men with demanding jobs would rather have old-fashioned wives, like their mums, than equals. The study found that a high I.Q. hampers a woman's chance to get married, while it is a plus for men. The prospect for marriage increased by 35 percent for guys for each 16-point increase in I.Q.; for women, there is a 40 percent drop for each 16-point rise.

So was the feminist movement some sort of cruel hoax? The more women achieve, the less desirable they are? Women want to be in a relationship with guys they can seriously talk to - unfortunately, a lot of those guys want to be in relationships with women they don't have to talk to.

I asked the actress and writer Carrie Fisher, on the East Coast to promote her novel "The Best Awful," who confirmed that women who challenge men are in trouble.

"I haven't dated in 12 million years," she said drily. "I gave up on dating powerful men because they wanted to date women in the service professions. So I decided to date guys in the service professions. But then I found out that kings want to be treated like kings, and consorts want to be treated like kings, too."

-----------

Thoughts?
Why do I get deja-vu? Didn't this topic / thread come by before? The quoted article was published nineteen years ago.
 

BPH

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
1,077
Location
Wilmington, DE
Why do I get deja-vu? Didn't this topic / thread come by before? The quoted article was published nineteen years ago.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
3,265
Reaction score
2,508
Age
30
Location
Nashville, TN
As the years go by, the more I view MGTOW/Incels as the male equivalent to FEMINISM. Both sides are angry, delusional, failing, and refuse to adapt and improve so they are more marketable. Instead, they stick to their disgruntled viewpoints and blame their shortcomings on everyone else.
I get MGTOWs because they are usually older with baggage like a divorce or two. At that point, why bother lol. INCELs I believe have evolved from the trench coat 4chan loser we remember them as.
 

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,830
Reaction score
4,524
I'd been noticing a trend along these lines, as famous and powerful men took up with the young women whose job it was to tend to them and care for them in some way: their secretaries, assistants, nannies, caterers, flight attendants, researchers and fact-checkers.
This article is spot on. I always wanted to marry a fact-checker.
 

RickTheToad

Moderator
Joined
Apr 21, 2018
Messages
6,556
Reaction score
5,082
Location
Bridgeport, CT
Article about Men Wanting Mommy.

-------------------------------------------------

A few years ago at a White House Correspondents' dinner, I met a very beautiful actress. Within moments, she blurted out: "I can't believe I'm 46 and not married. Men only want to marry their personal assistants or P.R. women."


I'd been noticing a trend along these lines, as famous and powerful men took up with the young women whose job it was to tend to them and care for them in some way: their secretaries, assistants, nannies, caterers, flight attendants, researchers and fact-checkers.

Women in staff support are the new sirens because, as a guy I know put it, they look upon the men they work for as "the moon, the sun and the stars." It's all about orbiting, serving and salaaming their Sun Gods.

In all those great Tracy/Hepburn movies more than a half-century ago, it was the snap and crackle of a romance between equals that was so exciting. Moviemakers these days seem far more interested in the soothing aura of romances between unequals.

In James Brooks's "Spanglish," Adam Sandler, as a Los Angeles chef, falls for his hot Mexican maid. The maid, who cleans up after Mr. Sandler without being able to speak English, is presented as the ideal woman. The wife, played by Téa Leoni, is repellent: a jangly, yakking, overachieving, overexercised, unfaithful, shallow she-monster who has just lost her job with a commercial design firm. Picture Faye Dunaway in "Network" if she'd had to stay home, or Glenn Close in "Fatal Attraction" without the charm.

The same attraction of unequals animated Richard Curtis's "Love Actually," a 2003 holiday hit. The witty and sophisticated British prime minister, played by Hugh Grant, falls for the chubby girl who wheels the tea and scones into his office. A businessman married to the substantial Emma Thompson falls for his sultry secretary. A writer falls for his maid, who speaks only Portuguese.

(I wonder if the trend in making maids who don't speak English heroines is related to the trend of guys who like to watch Kelly Ripa in the morning with the sound turned off?)

Art is imitating life, turning women who seek equality into selfish narcissists and objects of rejection, rather than affection.

As John Schwartz of The New York Times wrote recently, "Men would rather marry their secretaries than their bosses, and evolution may be to blame."

A new study by psychology researchers at the University of Michigan, using college undergraduates, suggests that men going for long-term relationships would rather marry women in subordinate jobs than women who are supervisors.

As Dr. Stephanie Brown, the lead author of the study, summed it up for reporters: "Powerful women are at a disadvantage in the marriage market because men may prefer to marry less-accomplished women." Men think that women with important jobs are more likely to cheat on them.

"The hypothesis," Dr. Brown said, "is that there are e Women, by contrast, did not show a marked difference in their attraction to men who might work above or below them. And men did not show a preference when it came to one-night stands.

A second study, which was by researchers at four British universities and reported last week, suggested that smart men with demanding jobs would rather have old-fashioned wives, like their mums, than equals. The study found that a high I.Q. hampers a woman's chance to get married, while it is a plus for men. The prospect for marriage increased by 35 percent for guys for each 16-point increase in I.Q.; for women, there is a 40 percent drop for each 16-point rise.

So was the feminist movement some sort of cruel hoax? The more women achieve, the less desirable they are? Women want to be in a relationship with guys they can seriously talk to - unfortunately, a lot of those guys want to be in relationships with women they don't have to talk to.

I asked the actress and writer Carrie Fisher, on the East Coast to promote her novel "The Best Awful," who confirmed that women who challenge men are in trouble.

"I haven't dated in 12 million years," she said drily. "I gave up on dating powerful men because they wanted to date women in the service professions. So I decided to date guys in the service professions. But then I found out that kings want to be treated like kings, and consorts want to be treated like kings, too."

-----------

Thoughts?
Bullsh!t. I have zero interest in hitting up the nurses which work under me. A female's perspective isn't always right.
 

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
1,622
Reaction score
484
It makes a lot of sense to consider MGTOW/incel as the male equivalent to feminism. It's a viewpoint that I share.



Yes, this is correct. It's usually apparent by the end of a first date with a female lawyer, doctor/dentist, or ambitious businesswoman.

There was one time where I went on a date with a female lawyer against my better judgment. I had zero interest in offering her a 2nd date. She was telling me a story about how she had spent the previous Thanksgiving Day working on a major work project. I have no interest in having a girlfriend who does office work on Thanksgiving Day as a girlfriend. I would rather be alone. It would be more understandable if she were a physician working in a medical emergency room on a major holiday, but I'm also generally not interested in female physicians who work on major holidays either.

Women's career achievements in high powered careers are rarely sexual turn-ons for men. That is even true for beta males, who are less likely to admit that. I see myself as a sigma male (the reason why I have the lone wolf avatar) and alpha/sigma types are even less attracted to high powered careerist women who often hold strong feminist viewpoints.
I know I've said being a careerist in and of itself doesn't disqualify a woman (for me). And I stand by what I said.

That being said, I admit a decent amount of careerist broads happen to possess qualities I find offputting.

One of my former bosses is a prime example. She was totally lacking in compassion (as @The Duke pointed out, a lot of careerist broads lack compassion). She showed no compassion whatsoever when I had a panic attack right in front of her once. Even though I found her attractive, no way could I bring myself to be with her (even for casual sex). There's no way I could relax in a bedroom setting with her.

And here's the real kicker: That boss ended up getting fired/forced to resign because it came out she was having an affair with a direct report. How ironic; she was super nitpicky about everyone else's behavior, yet it turned out she behaved the worst of anyone.

For a TV example of a careerist who lacks compassion, Beth from Yellowstone. I'm incredibly attracted to Beth, yet there's no way I could relax around her either. And Beth is far from a feminist (she hates the stereotypical purple-haired feminist). Goes to show: Even non-feminist careerist broads are prone to exhibiting negative qualities.

I don't paint all careerist broads with the same brush, however, because I've known some down to earth careerist broads.
 

Solomon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
2,784
Location
Inside her mind
Men have always valued nurturing, caring, submissiveness, compassion, and supporting traits in women. Women that want to climb the corporate ladder and subscribe to feminist ideals tend to lack most all of those things I listed. Thats why a masculine man has little use for them.

I have never met a woman that I could be open with and trust like I could a man. Thats why you can't talk to them. They draw false conclusions and get things twisted due to their insecurities and fragile minds. Its why we always say here its pointless to argue with them, don't discuss redpill concepts, don't tell them about SoSuave.

As the years go by, the more I view MGTOW/Incels as the male equivalent to FEMINISM. Both sides are angry, delusional, failing, and refuse to adapt and improve so they are more marketable. Instead, they stick to their disgruntled viewpoints and blame their shortcomings on everyone else.
I remember one time I was "vulnerable" with an ex-girlfriend trying to emotionally open up, she ended up laughing and saying "that sounds gay" I forgot what I was opening up about my response was "see that's why men don't open up to women" point being as a man there are certain **** you should keep to yourelf
 

Men frequently err by talking too much. They often monopolize conversations, droning on and on about topics that bore women to tears. They think they're impressing the women when, in reality, they're depressing the women.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Top