Me vs. Dumb Pregnant Chick

The Assistant

Banned
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
5
Normally I don't do this.........but there is a girl that one of my best friends knows, and she is 23, dating a guy who is 18 years old, and is pregnant. I have met her before once, and she had told me that she got pregnant just because she felt her life wasn't interesting enough..........call me crazy, but I decided to call her out on facebook of all places. Tell me how amazingly STUPID this piece of crap feminist moron is, as well her friend who tries to defend having a baby out of wedlock first (you'll laugh):


ME (talking to the stupid girl's friend, but the idiot girl herself will jump in)

I never said that getting married is the solution......the solution is abortion until you are ready to have a child. The person in question here (Dina) decided to get knocked up and have a child for very selfish reasons (because of loneliness, and thinking that a child will make life more fun for her).........you can't argue the fact that the BEST way to have a baby is after you are married and know that you are going to be with that person for the rest of your life (thus mostly eliminating the chance of that child seeing a divorce of his parents in the future). There is close to 0% chance that the child will have any kind of stable family when the child is had out of wedlock, and when the father is someone who isn't ready for the commitment of raising a child for 18 years.See More
48 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - well, in that case maybe you should marry Dina, if you're so concerned about it.
47 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME in case you haven't noticed, this country lately is overrun by single moms....wasn't the case back in the day
47 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - Don't even get me started.
46 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME so Katrina, you basically ignored all of my points in that long post......care to actually comment logically instead of cracking a joke?
46 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME start......reply to the points i made in my long post
45 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - If you are, indeed, so concerned about a child having a "family," or father who would probably not be in his child's life much anyway, then perhaps you should remedy the situation by solving it.
45 minutes ago · LikeUnlike

#Idiot Chick's Friend - In addition, if you think you would be better suited because of your clearly greater emotional maturity, then do something about it
44 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME do you agree that it's selfish and irresponsible for a woman to have a child under these circumstances?
43 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME i don't see how this is about me in any way.....i am in no way involved in the situation, I am just giving my opinion......why would you even argue the point that I should do anything about Dina's selfish decision?
42 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - You seem to think that you have a right to judge her decision, when in fact, you have no such right in any way, since it was in fact, her decision, and not yours
40 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME
i always have the right to comment on a decision....and maybe if more women made SMART decisions, instead of selfish stupid decisions, this world would have less single mothers running around raising children without proper male role models....

I love it how women are so quick to defend each other, despite the obvious logic of the situation.See More
38 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - It is not selfish for a woman to have a child because she wants to, no matter how you want to portray it, and saying that she needs a man or finances to have one is ludicrous and irrelevant to the act of having and raising a child
37 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - So you're saying that, in order for a woman to make a "smart" decision to have a child, she needs a man? Perhaps if more men made "smart" decisions, there wouldn't be any single mothers.
35 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME wow.....you are poisoned with a real big feminist opinion that is SOOOO unhealthy for society overall......the family morals in this nation are completely crumbling........this is disgusting
34 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME a child cannot be raised properly without a father. period.
33 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - Well then perhaps, there should be more loving, caring men who keep their ****s in their pants.
32 minutes ago · LikeUnlike


#
THE Stupid Bytch Herself (Dina) only God can judge, And your rude comments about me r falsified and slander. I can take criticism from you because i have a thick skin. for you to insult all single mothers and condone abortion is psycho though. And don't blame every single mothers problems on me, im not a scape goat I'm an individual with intellect and I deserve respect.
23 minutes ago · LikeUnlike

ME
ok let's not make this about Dina anymore..........let's make this about women who decide to have children with men who they are not married to - God is against that. What's your argument there? (since you bring up God in the first place)....

If you, as a God-fearing Christian dare slander his word and have premarital sex, then all of your god-bull**** goes out the window, and an abortion (which is legal) is the best option to save yourself from God's wrath.......am I not making logical sense?See More
18 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME God does not want anyone having children out of wedlock (since God doesn't even want anyone having sex out of wedlock).....so if you want to use a religious tone against me, then I can easily strike back at you with simple logic
16 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
THE Stupid Bytch Herself (Dina) Honestly I posted about eBay auctions and this guy gets into my personal life. You want to criticize my personal life, and Im shocked that you would be friends (this is her comment towards the guy who's my good friend) with such a maniac that is as illogical as the tucson shooter or the Oklahoma bomber. If you don't like single moms or what this world is coming to don't complain to me about it. I'm not a single mom anyway and many unmarried mother still have the fathers in their lives. Let's not start on the sanctity of marriage.
11 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME LOL it takes a real idiot to compare what i've said to a murderer. You Dina take the moron of the year award.
4 minutes ago · Like



Anyway, that was all a big waste of 45 minutes or so, just to see that there is yet another amazingly awful tramp out there who wants to have children out of wedlock, and then tries to compare ME to a murderer for bringing up the point that it's important for a child to have a father and a real family.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised....but am I allowed to be sickened with disgust?
 

Mike32ct

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
8,105
Reaction score
4,715
Location
Eastern Time Zone where it's always really late
The Assistant said:
Normally I don't do this.........but there is a girl that one of my best friends knows, and she is 23, dating a guy who is 18 years old, and is pregnant. I have met her before once, and she had told me that she got pregnant just because she felt her life wasn't interesting enough..........call me crazy, but I decided to call her out on facebook of all places. Tell me how amazingly STUPID this piece of crap feminist moron is, as well her friend who tries to defend having a baby out of wedlock first (you'll laugh):


ME (talking to the stupid girl's friend, but the idiot girl herself will jump in)

I never said that getting married is the solution......the solution is abortion until you are ready to have a child. The person in question here (Dina) decided to get knocked up and have a child for very selfish reasons (because of loneliness, and thinking that a child will make life more fun for her).........you can't argue the fact that the BEST way to have a baby is after you are married and know that you are going to be with that person for the rest of your life (thus mostly eliminating the chance of that child seeing a divorce of his parents in the future). There is close to 0% chance that the child will have any kind of stable family when the child is had out of wedlock, and when the father is someone who isn't ready for the commitment of raising a child for 18 years.See More
48 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - well, in that case maybe you should marry Dina, if you're so concerned about it.
47 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME in case you haven't noticed, this country lately is overrun by single moms....wasn't the case back in the day
47 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - Don't even get me started.
46 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME so Katrina, you basically ignored all of my points in that long post......care to actually comment logically instead of cracking a joke?
46 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME start......reply to the points i made in my long post
45 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - If you are, indeed, so concerned about a child having a "family," or father who would probably not be in his child's life much anyway, then perhaps you should remedy the situation by solving it.
45 minutes ago · LikeUnlike

#Idiot Chick's Friend - In addition, if you think you would be better suited because of your clearly greater emotional maturity, then do something about it
44 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME do you agree that it's selfish and irresponsible for a woman to have a child under these circumstances?
43 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME i don't see how this is about me in any way.....i am in no way involved in the situation, I am just giving my opinion......why would you even argue the point that I should do anything about Dina's selfish decision?
42 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - You seem to think that you have a right to judge her decision, when in fact, you have no such right in any way, since it was in fact, her decision, and not yours
40 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME
i always have the right to comment on a decision....and maybe if more women made SMART decisions, instead of selfish stupid decisions, this world would have less single mothers running around raising children without proper male role models....

I love it how women are so quick to defend each other, despite the obvious logic of the situation.See More
38 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - It is not selfish for a woman to have a child because she wants to, no matter how you want to portray it, and saying that she needs a man or finances to have one is ludicrous and irrelevant to the act of having and raising a child
37 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - So you're saying that, in order for a woman to make a "smart" decision to have a child, she needs a man? Perhaps if more men made "smart" decisions, there wouldn't be any single mothers.
35 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME wow.....you are poisoned with a real big feminist opinion that is SOOOO unhealthy for society overall......the family morals in this nation are completely crumbling........this is disgusting
34 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME a child cannot be raised properly without a father. period.
33 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
Idiot Chick's Friend - Well then perhaps, there should be more loving, caring men who keep their ****s in their pants.
32 minutes ago · LikeUnlike


#
THE Stupid Bytch Herself (Dina) only God can judge, And your rude comments about me r falsified and slander. I can take criticism from you because i have a thick skin. for you to insult all single mothers and condone abortion is psycho though. And don't blame every single mothers problems on me, im not a scape goat I'm an individual with intellect and I deserve respect.
23 minutes ago · LikeUnlike

ME
ok let's not make this about Dina anymore..........let's make this about women who decide to have children with men who they are not married to - God is against that. What's your argument there? (since you bring up God in the first place)....

If you, as a God-fearing Christian dare slander his word and have premarital sex, then all of your god-bull**** goes out the window, and an abortion (which is legal) is the best option to save yourself from God's wrath.......am I not making logical sense?See More
18 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME God does not want anyone having children out of wedlock (since God doesn't even want anyone having sex out of wedlock).....so if you want to use a religious tone against me, then I can easily strike back at you with simple logic
16 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
THE Stupid Bytch Herself (Dina) Honestly I posted about eBay auctions and this guy gets into my personal life. You want to criticize my personal life, and Im shocked that you would be friends (this is her comment towards the guy who's my good friend) with such a maniac that is as illogical as the tucson shooter or the Oklahoma bomber. If you don't like single moms or what this world is coming to don't complain to me about it. I'm not a single mom anyway and many unmarried mother still have the fathers in their lives. Let's not start on the sanctity of marriage.
11 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
#
ME LOL it takes a real idiot to compare what i've said to a murderer. You Dina take the moron of the year award.
4 minutes ago · Like



Anyway, that was all a big waste of 45 minutes or so, just to see that there is yet another amazingly awful tramp out there who wants to have children out of wedlock, and then tries to compare ME to a murderer for bringing up the point that it's important for a child to have a father and a real family.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised....but am I allowed to be sickened with disgust?
While I totally agree that a child needs a father and a real family, with all due respect, you were wasting your time trying to lecture this girl or her friend. It's just an exercise in futility. They will never see it your way and will backwards rationalize it by any means possible.
 

Warrior74

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
5,116
Reaction score
230
Ego. What woman in her right mind will say "I know, I'm wrong, I'm going to hell for this, I'm a terrible person" especially in a public forum such as the facespace. No, you will be the monster attacking a poor defenseless woman from the safety of your computer screen. (not saying that's what you are doing, but that's how it will be painted to the sympathizers and white knights). Even when they are wrong, they are right. Also, dude, you expect logical responses and for a member of the sisterhood to betray another? Think again. They only speak ill of other women they hate.
 

Boilermaker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
76
If a man speaks his mind in a forest and no woman hears it,


would he still be wrong?
 

runner83

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
47
Location
Australia
Boilermaker said:
If a man speaks his mind in a forest and no woman hears it,


would he still be wrong?
Haha :D

This would probably be the only time he was right!

OP, I agree with what you said, but trying to argue it logically with some dumb broad who got herself knocked up out of wedlock is a waste of time.
 

grayclif

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
540
Reaction score
226
I can't believe I just took the time to read that. But Dina's friend is right - it's Dina's choice. Women have been "tricking" men to get them pregnant for whatever reason since the beginning of time. It's up to men to guard against this by disassociating ourselves from these type of people. If that is not possible always use a condom.
 

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
340
Age
56
Location
Nevada
I have a saying that drives my wife insane on a regular basis; "I hate being right all the time." It makes her crazy because 95% of the time it's true. That might seem really conceited, but it comes from this internal reasoning I have matured into and fine tuned for the last 40 years. What I do is this; before I engage in any debate or any conversation that I think will likely develop into disagreeing views, or even speculating on future events that others might disagree with, my thought pattern is one of estimating what investments this person has in winning their argument that are key to maintaing their beliefs, their ego and their sense of self-worth (particularly when it contributes to a sense of belonging to a group). It's gotten to the point where I'm pretty accurate at this and I can do so quickly and reliably.

Once I have a basic understanding of a person's predispositions and how their personality relies upon them, my next line of thought is "what is going to be the ultimate outcome of this conversation?" Judging from my estimation of this person's personal conditions, am I going to change this person's mind about anything at all by the time the conversation's through? Does this person even have the capacity for critical thought and personal introspect about anything I might present to them? If the answer is even a marginal 'yes', then I may follow through with confronting that person. Sadly though, the overwhelming majority is a resounding 'no', so I don't bother attempting to educate those unwilling to be educated. It's a waste of both our time.

I realize that sounds very ****sure and self-aggrandizing, but don't let the process I'm describing here be mistaken with my own openness to being educated myself in the course of a mutually beneficial debate.

The problem you encountered with these women is that their conditions make their mindset a necessity. You're not going to change these girl's minds about anything because their sense of self-worth depends upon their perspective being true. You lost the debate before you started. This is the typical case with women - construct a convenient reality to live out her conditions in. Most (not all) women generally lack a rational, critical capacity to assess themselves and make personal change. Instead they'll create comfortable, socially reinforcing and reaffirming mental environments in which they can cope with their personal conditions, and hopefully recruit others to participate (see, AFC Cap'n Save-A-Ho in your above example).
 

Demodulate

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Feb 16, 2003
Messages
265
Reaction score
5
what do they say..

arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics..

even if you do win.. your still retarded..

why stoop down to her level, just ignore the ****..
 

Noodles

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
130
Reaction score
7
Location
London
The Assistant said:
Anyway, that was all a big waste of 45 minutes or so, just to see that there is yet another amazingly awful tramp out there who wants to have children out of wedlock, and then tries to compare ME to a murderer for bringing up the point that it's important for a child to have a father and a real family.
So many people on this site sound like they're going to burst a blood vessel...

Given that I'm never getting married, I'm going to have to find a woman that will have kids out of wedlock if I want add my DNA to the gene pool.

Admittedly having a kid at 23 with an 18 year old doesn't strike me as the best idea, but it really doesn't effect me so I don't really care. I try to concentrate my time and effort on things that actually effect me or my friends.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

DMSR76

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
224
Reaction score
11
Location
Houston, TX
samspade said:
Ask a woman half of a couple how they met and you'll be regaled with tales of chance, the stars, and the moon. Ask the man (separately) and he'll tell you he just approached her because she looked cute.
LOL. So true.
 

Warrior74

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
5,116
Reaction score
230
Rollo Tomassi said:
I have a saying that drives my wife insane on a regular basis; "I hate being right all the time." It makes her crazy because 95% of the time it's true. That might seem really conceited, but it comes from this internal reasoning I have matured into and fine tuned for the last 40 years. What I do is this; before I engage in any debate or any conversation that I think will likely develop into disagreeing views, or even speculating on future events that others might disagree with, my thought pattern is one of estimating what investments this person has in winning their argument that are key to maintaing their beliefs, their ego and their sense of self-worth (particularly when it contributes to a sense of belonging to a group). It's gotten to the point where I'm pretty accurate at this and I can do so quickly and reliably.

Once I have a basic understanding of a person's predispositions and how their personality relies upon them, my next line of thought is "what is going to be the ultimate outcome of this conversation?" Judging from my estimation of this person's personal conditions, am I going to change this person's mind about anything at all by the time the conversation's through? Does this person even have the capacity for critical thought and personal introspect about anything I might present to them? If the answer is even a marginal 'yes', then I may follow through with confronting that person. Sadly though, the overwhelming majority is a resounding 'no', so I don't bother attempting to educate those unwilling to be educated. It's a waste of both our time.

I realize that sounds very ****sure and self-aggrandizing, but don't let the process I'm describing here be mistaken with my own openness to being educated myself in the course of a mutually beneficial debate.

The problem you encountered with these women is that their conditions make their mindset a necessity. You're not going to change these girl's minds about anything because their sense of self-worth depends upon their perspective being true. You lost the debate before you started. This is the typical case with women - construct a convenient reality to live out her conditions in. Most (not all) women generally lack a rational, critical capacity to assess themselves and make personal change. Instead they'll create comfortable, socially reinforcing and reaffirming mental environments in which they can cope with their personal conditions, and hopefully recruit others to participate (see, AFC Cap'n Save-A-Ho in your above example).
Awesome post. You covered everything I was thinking.
 

scrouds

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
42
Location
Orlando, fl
The only way I've ever really gotten through on arguments like this with women is to learn to manipulate the emotional constructs behind the argument. When they accept that, then you can go and prove a point.

Its usually not worth the work involved.
 

The Assistant

Banned
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
5
So many good points made by everyone, I don't even know which one to address.....but seems like the general idea is "don't argue with idiots".

So, I guess there is simply no way to stop this kind of poisonous thinking from spreading in this country....is the only solution to a stable happy life is to move out to a country that hasn't been hit with the feminazi stick?
 

Atom Smasher

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
8,715
Reaction score
6,654
Age
67
Location
The 7th Dimension
Warrior74 said:
Awesome post. You covered everything I was thinking.
I was going to rep Rollo, but since you were thinking the same thing, I'll rep you instead. You trumped him by not having to actually type it. I'm just being goofy, bro. Pain killers. ;) Nothin but respek for you, Warrior, always.

On a serious note, I think in certain circumstances, it is good to engage a moron publically as long as one stays well above the level of the moron.

This way, those on the periphery will be exposed to an opposing, rational view and will be subconsciously affected by that exposure. If we remain silent and just say, "Don't argue with idiots", then idiocy will continue to overrun and overtake our already sick society unchallenged and unimpeded.

Perhaps it is best to say, "Don't argue with idiots, but always refute them and point out their illogic for the benefit of others".

As you guys well know, emotional involvement makes us look worse than the adversary to the other idiots in observance, but detachment is power in terms of persuasion and credibility.
 

If you want to talk, talk to your friends. If you want a girl to like you, listen to her, ask questions, and act like you are on the edge of your seat.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
11,293
Reaction score
4,665
I think that the meme of single mommies intentionally getting knocked up is explained by Rollo Tomassi's theory of mating schedules. When a woman determines it's time to have a child, and she is not dating any interesting man in particular, she will take whatever sperm she can get her vag!na on (although she will try to at least find a man with some finances so that she can get some child support.) Of course, the only marketing scheme that is more powerful than "free beer" is "free p----", so such a woman would have to have extraordinarily low sexual market value to not be able to give it away. A woman will rationalize that a daddy can be gotten at a later time if the sperm donor is not suitable (that "free p----" usually gets a sexually frustrated beta male to sign up to be a stepdaddy.)

Typically however, a woman with such a schedule will be on alert for just the right mark who she thinks she will be able to convert from a f--- buddy relationship into a shotgun marriage. And I have to admit, that within my limited social network, it seems that every one of the men ended up marrying the woman after she had her "accident". Because of this, I only bareback with women that I would not mind getting knocked up, and tend to prefer cheap pros to f--- buddies I would rather not knock up.
 
Top