Let's Be Real Here Pt.2 - WOMEN are the prize

[Smooth_texter]

Advice from the old lady:

Inbox invites are not the same as actual interest. So what if 100 guys like a chick if she isn’t attracted to any of them.

Real options are people you are attracted to who are attracted back. Obviously the higher SMV you have the more real options you have.

The problem is that yes, many people are in fact utterly delusional. The reward for that delusional stance is ending up alone or unable to maintain a relationship.

I chose from men who also chose me, and fortunately I had good choices to pick from. No way no how would I ever pursue a man, rather I chose from those pursuing me.

Recognize low or no interest women and move on. If the women you want don’t see you or show interest in you? You are just as delusional as the women you criticize. You have work to do or reality to accept. Like the delusional chicks.

Hi BeExcellent.

Thanks for the input. I disagree on the inbox/social media or OLD likes not generating attraction in a woman.

I think that modern women have more than a few funnels form which they source men - work, area they live in, hobbies, men that cold approached her, facebook, Instagram, OLD and so on.

Regardless of the type of funnel, women prioritize good looking and high value men from each funnel, before narrowing the choices to say 4-5 men (as you have also said). Not that their actual options were 5, but those were the selected from hundreds/thousands of men.

Once a woman has created her elite group from the best of the best, she lets them compete for her (thus making her the prize).

This confirms what you have said - "I chose from men that chose me".

 

[Smooth_texter]

For me it never mattered that my dating pool was relatively small. I stood out because of my non looks qualities (although I have looks as well) and I chose a man who meets my most important criteria (looks, fitness, sex appeal, masculinity, ambition, intelligence) who is a semi pro athlete in an adventure sport, makes 6 figures and makes me laugh. And there were other high SMV quality men I could have dated seriously instead of my husband. Two called me during the engagement bummed that they didn’t get the opportunity, a retired pro hockey player & multimillionaire and a Hollywood movie producer. Not joking. So no I never lacked for real options.

I picked one. One only. That’s all I require. I had plenty of options to find that one.

Yes, this confirms my previous post.

You narrowed your dating pool to the top 3-5 men that were already chasing you. And afterwards, after dating them you chose the absolute best.

You did not chase anyone.

 

[BadBoy89]

I have outlined a simple logic that the average female in her 30/40s+ can literally pick from the 1% of interested in her males. So sitting on your arse after watching a few red pill podcasts and thinking "I am the prize" won't help. You have two options - either become a 99%+ male or pick a female for which you are the 99% percenter.

Your post is anecdotal and doesn’t prove anything. But let’s say it’s true. The 1% of males interested could still be a bad subset. They aren’t narrowed down to “6’1, $100,000 / year, own business.“, it’s just 1% of males interested.

Even if a 30/40 woman could do that, the man would likely reject her if she has kids, ex husbands, divorces, etc. Let’s say a man is an average 36 year old, normal job, normal car, normal house, 0 kids, 0 divorces. He matches with a 44 year old single mother with a 10 year son. He’s not going to jump at that. Maybe for quick sex, but that’s it

You are taking a general thing and applying it to a specific circumstance.

 

[Smooth_texter]

Your post is anecdotal and doesn’t prove anything. But let’s say it’s true. The 1% of males interested could still be a bad subset. They aren’t narrowed down to “6’1, $100,000 / year, own business.“, it’s just 1% of males interested.

Even if a 30/40 woman could do that, the man would likely reject her if she has kids, ex husbands, divorces, etc. Let’s say a man is an average 36 year old, normal job, normal car, normal house, 0 kids, 0 divorces. He matches with a 44 year old single mother with a 10 year son. He’s not going to jump at that. Maybe for quick sex, but that’s it

You are taking a general thing and applying it to a specific circumstance.

My general logic follows the same logic of the corporate HR hiring process. If a company has let's say 300 candidates for an open position, they usually interview only like 5 of them. So a woman literally would not have the physical time to chat with all hundreds of newly daily generated guy profiles. So she would choose the absolute highest SMV ones. In the videos that I posted, you can see that in an obese/old woman's swipe queues there were even some tall and athletic men, who also projected an interesting lifestyle (which is a chick's catnip).

The actual commitment does not matter. The fact that any woman can get a top/better than average man even on a date changes their way of thinking. She starts expecting commitment from high value men and thus becoming delusional.

Even in your second example, the 36 y.o. guy is a catch and high enough SMV for a 44 y.o. single mom. If she had relations with him, but did not get commitment, she would make that guy the standard to which future guys would need to measure up, unless she gets an even better deal.

 

[BeExcellent]

Actually the commitment matters a great deal.

Anyone can try on a Chanel suit. Can you afford to purchase it and do you have places to wear it? That’s the real deal if you can/do. Men will dumpster dive at times. If the guy is dumpster diving and the chick thinks he’s actually going to commit to her? She’s the sucker in that scenario, hands down.

I know a few single women like this. They don’t get it. And it’s not like you can just tell them “Gee, you need to lose 40 pounds, dress better and work out.” That just makes people mad. If someone hasn’t figured out they are too heavy/frumpy/whatever? Then either pick a dude who is fine with you AS IS, or be alone.

The struggle is real folks. It’s self inflicted but it’s real.

 

[Bingo-Player]

Some great content in this thread it needs to be pinned really

@BackInTheGame78 ??

 

[Bigpapa]

My general logic follows the same logic of the
Even in your second example, the 36 y.o. guy is a catch and high enough SMV for a 44 y.o. single mom. If she had relations with him, but did not get commitment, she would make that guy the standard to which future guys would need to measure up, unless she gets an even better deal.

Drive the new bmw for 1 month and then try to drive a 10-15 years old ford

You will feel that the the ford is a piece of shi1t and you will not be comfortable at all ( even if before you were perfectly fine with it )

The feeling of settling is quite a salty one to have, because it contradicts your previous experiences

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

My time is the prize. Any woman who wants to be the prize and occupy my time must show herself worthy.

 

[NealIRC]

My time is the prize. Any woman who wants to be the prize and occupy my time must show herself worthy.

So how do women ask you out?

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

So how do women ask you out?

They come up to me and pay me compliments, then engage me in delightful witty conversation.

 

[AttackFormation]

The reason why women are the “prize” in western and westernized countries is because men have created social rules that benefit women at the expense of men. If you build a society where women get protection and financial security without having to give anything in return, don’t be surprised that your worth is nothing.

Which social rules are those? and what kind of protection and financial security?