Laura Loomer was banned from Facebook, paid Zucky's castle a visit

Do you use Facebook?

  • Regularly

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Have an account, don't use much

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Have an account, deactivated it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't use it, **** that ****

    Votes: 6 85.7%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

touma.akagi

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
257
Reaction score
102
Location
-
Laura Loomer, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo Yiannopolous and Alex Jones were all banned from Facebook, and its child app Instagram, a few days ago. Laura actually found out about her ban from Instagram 30 minutes before it was supposed to happen, as people were in on it, and she was able to make a final post.

Look, I understand that there's a valid reason to think of Laura as an obnoxious troll given what she did to Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom's homes, and you could argue that it and her other actions such as the Twitter HQ handcuffing, stirs the pot more. But the fact is, Laura's been banned from Uber, PayPal, Lyft among several other apps and services. And for what? Her political beliefs. And it makes me sick to my stomach, to be frank.

I also am a conservative. I'm just not banned for anything because I'm not on The Mob's radar... yet. "The nail that stands up..."

A ban from YouTube may not even be that far off for her. How else can the higher ups at Google interpret Facebook's action as a green-light for them to do so?

So yeah, in the vid, she visits the lobby of Facebook HQ and the police come on down and force her to leave. She tries to leave Zuck a parting gift, but the staff members working the lobby refuse to deliver it to him.

Laura's best known for trolling AOC and Ilhan Omar, trolling the women's march, and meeting Donald Trump Jr.
 

sosousage

Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
1,235
Age
34
Laura Loomer, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo Yiannopolous and Alex Jones were all banned from Facebook, and its child app Instagram, a few days ago. Laura actually found out about her ban from Instagram 30 minutes before it was supposed to happen, as people were in on it, and she was able to make a final post.

Look, I understand that there's a valid reason to think of Laura as an obnoxious troll given what she did to Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom's homes, and you could argue that it and her other actions such as the Twitter HQ handcuffing, stirs the pot more. But the fact is, Laura's been banned from Uber, PayPal, Lyft among several other apps and services. And for what? Her political beliefs. And it makes me sick to my stomach, to be frank.

I also am a conservative. I'm just not banned for anything because I'm not on The Mob's radar... yet. "The nail that stands up..."

A ban from YouTube may not even be that far off for her. How else can the higher ups at Google interpret Facebook's action as a green-light for them to do so?

So yeah, in the vid, she visits the lobby of Facebook HQ and the police come on down and force her to leave. She tries to leave Zuck a parting gift, but the staff members working the lobby refuse to deliver it to him.

Laura's best known for trolling AOC and Ilhan Omar, trolling the women's march, and meeting Donald Trump Jr.

how special person you have to be to be banned from taxi LMAO
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,518
Reaction score
5,897
I think a business should be able to ban anybody it wants to.
I agree with your point, a private company or business should be free to decide to who deliver service or deal with.

The fact is that businesses can say fvck it to someone from a side but cant to those in the other otherwise it becomes a "discrimination".

Lets make it simple while avoiding politics (nevermind we cant), a night club can refuse guys to enter cause they want to keep a certain ratio within or simply cause its a girls night, yet if an other business keeps poor people away cause they cant bring wealth or certain groups of people cause they usually bring troubles, then it becomes discrimination.

Going back to facebook, twitter, youtube and so on what they did untill now is basically to ban those who DO NOT accept the agenda that such companies embrace and by agenda I mean a political one, a leftist globalist one.
 

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,433
Reaction score
6,929
Laura Loomer, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo Yiannopolous and Alex Jones were all banned from Facebook, and its child app Instagram, a few days ago. Laura actually found out about her ban from Instagram 30 minutes before it was supposed to happen, as people were in on it, and she was able to make a final post.

Look, I understand that there's a valid reason to think of Laura as an obnoxious troll given what she did to Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom's homes, and you could argue that it and her other actions such as the Twitter HQ handcuffing, stirs the pot more. But the fact is, Laura's been banned from Uber, PayPal, Lyft among several other apps and services. And for what? Her political beliefs. And it makes me sick to my stomach, to be frank.

I also am a conservative. I'm just not banned for anything because I'm not on The Mob's radar... yet. "The nail that stands up..."

A ban from YouTube may not even be that far off for her. How else can the higher ups at Google interpret Facebook's action as a green-light for them to do so?

So yeah, in the vid, she visits the lobby of Facebook HQ and the police come on down and force her to leave. She tries to leave Zuck a parting gift, but the staff members working the lobby refuse to deliver it to him.

Laura's best known for trolling AOC and Ilhan Omar, trolling the women's march, and meeting Donald Trump Jr.
She's fat and ugly.

All fat and ugly women should be banned in social media.

Pretty sexy cute polite feminine women brightens up the world and should be allowed to flourish in social media.

If fatties causes more trouble to get attention then I'd advocate jail time.
 

touma.akagi

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
257
Reaction score
102
Location
-
As for Trump, do you mean he can't block users on Twitter? About that, I'm not sure...if he's an elected official perhaps it's different.
A user blocking someone and the service itself banning someone from the platform are two separate things entirely.

Donald Trump blocking someone won't be affective. He has a public profile, so all someone needs to do to see it is log out. Blocking is only effective on a private profile.

The reason Trump's not banned from Twitter is that if he was, CNN wouldn't be able to nitpick about his tweets. Trump says rough and mean things, so obviously CNN wants to take advantage of that and twist them to the fullest contrived ulterior meaning possible.
 

Shrubber101

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
188
Reaction score
204
Age
51
What a whiney little snowflake. You all joined Facebook like sheep and made it what it was then complain about the censorship.

I remember the early days of the internet when people didn't just use Facebook and YouTube. There's plenty of platforms for free speech that aren't multinational companies.

I've never used it because I knew what it was becoming.
Facebook is wet dream for governments that want to keep tabs on their citizens.

I remember here in the UK when they were constantly pushing to bring out national ID cards. Every time a so_called terrorist attack occured or a kid got abducted, they tried to push ID cards, then when Facebook started to take off, ID cards suddenly took a back seat and were never mentioned again. Bit of a coincidence.

People have willingly given up their privacy out of their own narcissism. Facebook gives the government and corporations more info about you than any ID system ever could and completely voluntary. They must be laughing their arses off.

Stop using Facebook. Problem solved.
 

sosousage

Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
1,235
Age
34
What a whiney little snowflake. You all joined Facebook like sheep and made it what it was then complain about the censorship.

I remember the early days of the internet when people didn't just use Facebook and YouTube. There's plenty of platforms for free speech that aren't multinational companies.

I've never used it because I knew what it was becoming.
Facebook is wet dream for governments that want to keep tabs on their citizens.

I remember here in the UK when they were constantly pushing to bring out national ID cards. Every time a so_called terrorist attack occured or a kid got abducted, they tried to push ID cards, then when Facebook started to take off, ID cards suddenly took a back seat and were never mentioned again. Bit of a coincidence.

People have willingly given up their privacy out of their own narcissism. Facebook gives the government and corporations more info about you than any ID system ever could and completely voluntary. They must be laughing their arses off.

Stop using Facebook. Problem solved.
IF you set everything to private then they cant see almost anything about you,
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,341
Reaction score
3,972
Location
象外
There's plenty of platforms for free speech that aren't multinational companies.
Nobody is really being censored.

The last decade are so have been unique in that it was very easy for anybody with a few second hand ideas to EASILY become famous.

Before 2000 or so, going back to the printing press, if you wanted to get your message you had to work HARD for LIFE to get people to hear you.

Go down to the public square, stand up and take some serious risks making your point. FIGHT for people's attention.

Most of the "idea" that all these conservatives social media super stars have are very UNORIGINAL, mostly second hand ideas.

What they are REALLY miffed about is their VERY EASY and RISK FREE fame and income is gone.

You want to spread some ideas?

Save a ton of money, tour the country SELL tickets and speak to audiences.

What most people are missing is that the audiences, by and large, of these social media superheroes are too lazy to leave the house and spend their time on social media lazily clicking whatever pops up next in their feed.

Some of these famous internet heroes have given actual speeches, old school style.

Their audiences are TINY and their public speaking skills are uninspiring.

If getting banned from social media is what gets peoples panties in a twist, just wait till the dollar stops being the reserve currency.

Then you'll see some serious wailing and gnashing of teeth.
 

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,433
Reaction score
6,929
Nobody is really being censored.

The last decade are so have been unique in that it was very easy for anybody with a few second hand ideas to EASILY become famous.

Before 2000 or so, going back to the printing press, if you wanted to get your message you had to work HARD for LIFE to get people to hear you.

Go down to the public square, stand up and take some serious risks making your point. FIGHT for people's attention.

Most of the "idea" that all these conservatives social media super stars have are very UNORIGINAL, mostly second hand ideas.

What they are REALLY miffed about is their VERY EASY and RISK FREE fame and income is gone.

You want to spread some ideas?

Save a ton of money, tour the country SELL tickets and speak to audiences.

What most people are missing is that the audiences, by and large, of these social media superheroes are too lazy to leave the house and spend their time on social media lazily clicking whatever pops up next in their feed.

Some of these famous internet heroes have given actual speeches, old school style.

Their audiences are TINY and their public speaking skills are uninspiring.

If getting banned from social media is what gets peoples panties in a twist, just wait till the dollar stops being the reserve currency.

Then you'll see some serious wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Well ain't that the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
 

touma.akagi

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
257
Reaction score
102
Location
-
What a whiney little snowflake. You all joined Facebook like sheep and made it what it was then complain about the censorship.

I remember the early days of the internet when people didn't just use Facebook and YouTube. There's plenty of platforms for free speech that aren't multinational companies.

Stop using Facebook. Problem solved.
You're right, there are platforms that aren't Facebook. But you're still missing the point. I'm not on Facebook myself, it's the principle of free speech that's at stake here. Because Twitter and Facebook did it, that's a green light for other platforms to do so.
 

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,433
Reaction score
6,929
You're right, there are platforms that aren't Facebook. But you're still missing the point. I'm not on Facebook myself, it's the principle of free speech that's at stake here. Because Twitter and Facebook did it, that's a green light for other platforms to do so.
Typical tunnel vision.
 
Top