Korean conflict

[highconscienceness]

You guys do know that there is war in Korea don't you. Well South Korea fired first. http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/nkorea-says-skorea-fired-first-20101123-185qh.html

This is to show ya'll how the controlled mainstream media feeds you a big fat c0ck of lies, every day.


Actually, this latest crisis is an engineered event designed to boost dollar. Other uses might be missile shield in that area, and testing ground for use of short range 'small' nuclear weapons. As well, let's not take side here, United States is solely responsible for putting nukes into Norths' hands.

Let's deviate for a moment, Iraq and Saddam with his chemical weapons. U.S. gave him those weapons.


Now I know there is a good portion of you who simply don't give a fvck about this stuff. Well you should. After all you love women, sleeping with them, hugging them, talking to them. If you're drafted into a conflict tomorrow, it might all end. I can understand partaking in a natural conflict, but something that was started by some rich bastards to achieve some goal which has nothing to do with me?? Sorry.



Let me put globalists' plan into a simple perspective for you all. War between United States and allies and China and allies.


It'll be far from something you don't give a fvck about in some country you never heard of.

 

[Inquisitus]

Maybe you should read what the article actually said.

------------------------
N.Korea says S.Korea fired first
November 23, 2010 - 9:39PM

AFP

North Korea said South Korea fired first in Tuesday's cross-border artillery duel, which killed two marines and injured 18 soldiers or civilians on a South Korean border island.

"The South Korean enemy, despite our repeated warnings, committed reckless military provocations of firing artillery shells into our maritime territory near Yeonpyeong island beginning 1pm (1500 AEDT)," a statement from the North's military supreme command said.

The North's military "will continue to make merciless military attacks with no hesitation if the South Korean enemy dares to invade our sea territory by 0.001 mm", it said in the statement carried by the official news agency.
Advertisement: Story continues below

"It is our military's traditional response to quell provocative actions with a merciless thunderbolt."

The statement added that in the West Sea (Yellow Sea), "there will only exist the sea boundary set by us".

The disputed sea border just north of the island was the scene of deadly naval clashes in 1999, 2002 and last November.

It was drawn by United Nations forces after the 1950-53 war and is known as the Northern Limit Line. The North says the border should run to the south of Yeonpyeong island.

The North began shelling after sending several messages protesting about South Korean naval, air force and army training exercises being staged close to the border, a Seoul presidential spokesman said.

The North's military said the South's "latest military provocation was a vicious effort to maintain the faulty Northern Limit Line" by frequent naval intrusions across the border.

© 2010 AFP
---------------------

Norks shell an inhabited island because ROK conducted exercises in uninhabited disputed waters. The Nork's own statements & actions indicate they are bat**** crazy. No media spin needed.

The Norks even sank a South Korean warship earlier this year.

 

[highconscienceness]

You know how it happened?

U.S. and S.Korea were "conducting exercises" with live ammunition within zone in which N.Korea said before they'd fire at anything that's there. Last I checked Pacific is huge, yellow sea is big too. Who fired first? S.Korea.

Now you don't stick your butt into a bees nest and say bees attacked you, do you? Cuz that's your logic.

It's like Israelis bombing the fvck out of Palestinians and then crying they blow themselves up on their buses. Provocation is provocation is a provocation, any fvcking way you put it. Reason you don't see it is cuz you're used to the big fat c0ck of lies sliding through your brain. But if you make an effort you could come through and see the full picture.


I'm not defending N.Korea at all. N.Korea is a creation of U.S.. Both Koreas are now being played.


This is far from being an I don't give a fvck conflict in an I don't give a fvck country. This involves Chinese interests, and those monkeys hold a lot of U.S. securities. They dump the dollar tomorrow, you'll be standing in bread line, but that will be least of your concern, because of draft line.

 

[Kerpal]

It was the Illuminati.

 

[f283000]

The global elite want to engineer world war 3 we have seen this coming for years. It's only a matter of time. Whether it be NK or Iran somebody is going to get attacked.

 

[Ease]

America will do whatever it wants. I have no doubt that media will spin twist and publish in its favour.

Iraq, Iran, israel, Palestine, North Korea, Afghanistan, terrorist organisations, whatever and wherever it is it will naturally cater to the interests of america who will be the driving force for it in one way or another.

I await to see how 'Peace will be brought' to that region of the world now.

 

[Outsider]

:crazy: coo-coo!

 

[JustLurk]

Well South Korea fired first.

And you know this how? Because you were there, right? Or better yet, because you made the decision to fire first? Or is it because you're feeding me some news article while mentioning in your own comment that the news feeds you lies?

Well you got fed lies one side or the other. I don't know who fired first and I damn well wouldn't trust either the NK military or the news to tell me the truth about it. Wars, avoid them. You don't know jack **** about why they got started and who you're fighting for, and you'll be killing other people who don't know jack **** about why they're actually fighting.

 

[Inquisitus]

You know how it happened?

U.S. and S.Korea were "conducting exercises" with live ammunition within zone in which N.Korea said before they'd fire at anything that's there. Last I checked Pacific is huge, yellow sea is big too. Who fired first? S.Korea.

Now you don't stick your butt into a bees nest and say bees attacked you, do you? Cuz that's your logic.

It's like Israelis bombing the fvck out of Palestinians and then crying they blow themselves up on their buses. Provocation is provocation is a provocation, any fvcking way you put it. Reason you don't see it is cuz you're used to the big fat c0ck of lies sliding through your brain. But if you make an effort you could come through and see the full picture.


I'm not defending N.Korea at all. N.Korea is a creation of U.S.. Both Koreas are now being played.


This is far from being an I don't give a fvck conflict in an I don't give a fvck country. This involves Chinese interests, and those monkeys hold a lot of U.S. securities. They dump the dollar tomorrow, you'll be standing in bread line, but that will be least of your concern, because of draft line.

You say that we're being fed a bunch of lies by the media. You claim that S. Korea fired first. Yet the article you quoted said that N.Korea claimed S.Korea fired first. Also, if you knew anything about the Korean situation, you'd know that N.Korea already committed an act of war several months ago yet S.Korea has not retaliated.

You equate the "provocation" to Palestinians & Israelis. Both of these sides have killled each other's citizens (civvy & military). In the Korean situation, S.Korea shelled empty water. N.Korea shelled an island with S.Korean people on it in addition to sinking a S.Korean warship. If you can't see the difference there, how can we trust your analysis at all?

Finally, on this being an orchestrated event to boost the dollar. In the short term, it will as long as no war actually occurs. But if the US gets into a shooting war over there, you can expect the US's deficit will balloon even more with another shooting war. Investors will rush out of the USD instantly devaluing HALF of China's foreign reserves. China is already worried that rising US deficit will devalue the USD.

What's the motive of these globalists in trying to have the US go to war with China?

 

[seagull]

When the US justified entry into the Vietnam War, it started with a lie (the fabricated "Gulf of Tonkin Incident" where the North Vietnamese supposedly attacked a US Navy ship, which has been proven to never have happened at all).

The War in Iraq was based on a lie, as everyone already knows ("weapons of mass destruction").

So I agree with the OP that it wouldn't be surprising if this was another lie to engineer another conflict.

 

[Huffman]

North Koreans state that South Korea fired "into their territory", but the South claims it's their own territory. Now do Southerners or Northerners live on this island?

 

[highconscienceness]

A new Rasmussen Reports poll conducted this week claims nearly 70% of Americans expect tensions between North and South Korea to build and they support U.S. military assistance, according to UPI.

The results show 68 percent believe war is imminent in the wake of North Korea’s terror bombing that killed soldiers and civilians in South Korea earlier in the week.

http://www.infowars.com/polls-tell-different-stories-on-new-korean-war/

 

[Sir Psycho Sexy]

Those polls mean nothing. People dont know what they are talking about when they say war is imminent.

North and South Korea have been on the brink of war ever since the 38th parallel was drawn to divide the two of them. They have been on the brink of war for almost 60 years. There have been many deadly incidents throughout the years between the two of them and it never escalates to war.

Also, the US has 10x the number of active nuclear warheads than China. Even if it wasnt a Nuclear war the US would destroy them. China has a large military(from what I hear) but have no means for moving it anywhere with any sense of speed. Dont even try comparing their navy and air fleet with the US. They are completely outmatched; it wouldnt even be fair. The US has the largest military budget in the world=strongest military in the world hands down. China declaring war on the US would be a death sentence for them and anyone else who joins them. Everyone knows that. Ever since WWII, America made it their mission to be the strongest country in the world. No one can argue they're not.

 

[highconscienceness]

@ sir psycho sexy

First. Present world events mean that war is eminent.


Second. War with China would destroy the fvck out of United States because United States has no means of manufacturing, it's all been outsourced. Furthermore China owns a lot of United States, financially. Furthermore, war between its ally, Russia, and United States would not only destroy both countries, and China, it would wipe out majority of humanity on planet in both northern and southern hemispheres.



Finally. It is a known and documented goal of global elites to cause a formidable global cataclysm in order to bring about their great work, the new world order. Global nuclear war seems formidable enough to me. It won't start this year, and it won't start with North Korea this year. We know as a fact it will be next year in the middle east and will spread throughout the world. However, North Korea could be the testing ground for short range "small" nuclear weapons.

This means one thing only, death of the green back, as China dumps its toxic USD assets in response to such an event. It is no surprise that globalists want global currency, the micro chip implants, and cashless society.



Now let me spell this out to you in bold letters.

There is no China, United States, Russia, Australia, etc. All these supposedly sovereign nations are controlled by global elites. These global elites are steering world events towards a common goal. They may not always have their own best interests at hand, but they all have a common goal, fruition of their great work, the new world order.

So it won't be war of nations. It will be slaughter house global population reduction.

 

[Outsider]

Anyone who doesn't believe that there is a China, United States and Australia should have a quick look at a map, and then shut the **** up.

 

[teagan]

@ sir psycho sexy

First. Present world events mean that war is eminent.


Second. War with China would destroy the fvck out of United States because United States has no means of manufacturing, it's all been outsourced. Furthermore China owns a lot of United States, financially. Furthermore, war between its ally, Russia, and United States would not only destroy both countries, and China, it would wipe out majority of humanity on planet in both northern and southern hemispheres.



Finally. It is a known and documented goal of global elites to cause a formidable global cataclysm in order to bring about their great work, the new world order. Global nuclear war seems formidable enough to me. It won't start this year, and it won't start with North Korea this year. We know as a fact it will be next year in the middle east and will spread throughout the world. However, North Korea could be the testing ground for short range "small" nuclear weapons.

This means one thing only, death of the green back, as China dumps its toxic USD assets in response to such an event. It is no surprise that globalists want global currency, the micro chip implants, and cashless society.



Now let me spell this out to you in bold letters.

There is no China, United States, Russia, Australia, etc. All these supposedly sovereign nations are controlled by global elites. These global elites are steering world events towards a common goal. They may not always have their own best interests at hand, but they all have a common goal, fruition of their great work, the new world order.

So it won't be war of nations. It will be slaughter house global population reduction.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Inquisitus]

F-ck, we got trolled.

 

[Sir Psycho Sexy]

@ sir psycho sexy

First. Present world events mean that war is eminent. [ lol what?]


Second. War with China would destroy the fvck out of United States because United States has no means of manufacturing, it's all been outsourced. Furthermore China owns a lot of United States, financially.
[United States manufacturing has not been outsourced. US military equipment is built in the US dipsh1t. Yes the US is in debt to China, whats your point? That wont help them make the US surrender. Its like the little nerdy kid in school telling the bully he owes him money still.

Furthermore, war between its ally, Russia, and United States would not only destroy both countries, and China, it would wipe out majority of humanity on planet in both northern and southern hemispheres.
[No Sh1t. No one wants a Nuclear war]



Finally. It is a known and documented goal of global elites to cause a formidable global cataclysm in order to bring about their great work, the new world order. Global nuclear war seems formidable enough to me. It won't start this year, and it won't start with North Korea this year. We know as a fact it will be next year in the middle east and will spread throughout the world. However, North Korea could be the testing ground for short range "small" nuclear weapons.

This means one thing only, death of the green back, as China dumps its toxic USD assets in response to such an event. It is no surprise that globalists want global currency, the micro chip implants, and cashless society.
[^^The rest of this I dont even want to respond to. You keep pulling sh1t out of your a$$ and claiming its a fact. ]



Now let me spell this out to you in bold letters.

There is no China, United States, Russia, Australia, etc. All these supposedly sovereign nations are controlled by global elites. These global elites are steering world events towards a common goal. They may not always have their own best interests at hand, but they all have a common goal, fruition of their great work, the new world order.

So it won't be war of nations. It will be slaughter house global population reduction.
[Are you really 29? ...]

....