Italo's Rant on Sluts

[legolas]

Originally posted by italostud
Avon - I totally hear you on the whole "letting go of those kind of views". But for myself, I will NEVER be able to accept a woman as a wife, if she has slept around. To me, that means that that particular woman is impulsive, irresponsible, and selfish. That's not the kind of woman I want to raise my children. Maybe I'm old fashioned? I don't know.

Doesn't that make you a hyppocrite then? You're bangin' em now, but when you get married you want a virgin Good for you anyway, but I still don't see what you're trying to accomplish other than masturbating with these girls' bodies as Pook would say.

 

[Bible_Belt]

If you are wondering where your future wife will come from, there are a new crop of 18-year-olds every year, some of them actually virginal. As Wooderson from the movie Dazed & Confused said, "That's the thing about these younger women - I keep getting older and they just stay the same age."

 

[Create Reality]

Are you advertising, Bible belt?

Italo I think your living in a fantasy world if you think you're gonna find a sweet, innocent little girl to marry. Grow up man, this is the 21st century and sex is the game. Women are not treated like they use to be back in the old days, as Pook tells us so well. Sex is twisted and shoved in your face everyday, liminal and subliminal, its used to sell just about everything these days.

Find a 22 year old virgin, and I'll give you a big cookie.

 

[Brian20o2]

Originally posted by Create Reality
Find a 22 year old virgin, and I'll give you a big cookie.

Nuff said

 

[italostud]

Originally posted by Create Reality
Are you advertising, Bible belt?

Italo I think your living in a fantasy world if you think you're gonna find a sweet, innocent little girl to marry. Grow up man, this is the 21st century and sex is the game. Women are not treated like they use to be back in the old days, as Pook tells us so well. Sex is twisted and shoved in your face everyday, liminal and subliminal, its used to sell just about everything these days.

Find a 22 year old virgin, and I'll give you a big cookie.

Fine. I'll hold you to that. Remember I like those pirate peanut butter cookies. Wrap it up nice with a bow and Fedex it when I marry my virgin.

 

[dereklearnslow]

Most of this thread can be summed up with "Wanting to have your cake and eat it too".

I find it audacious for some of you to say women these days are sluts and then, IN THE SAME BREATH, brag how much tail you get. Does that make any sense to you? Because to me it's like saying you hate being fat after eating a bucket of lard.

Don't get me wrong, a lot of you have posted reasonable arguments. Yes we are naturally predisposed to spread our seed or what have you, and men do have to work a lot harder for the poonani (unless you are Brad Pitt, Colin Ferrel, etc.), but damn, don't sh!t on the women that are doing YOU a favor (and if you are doing your job, should be doing her a favor as well (preferably many favors), so let's not argue that). If you despise these sluts so much, why sleep with them in the first damn place?

Oh yea. Low standards.

Which is fine. Live your life the way you want to, sleep with whomever you want, even if you have to be demeaningly hypocritical about it. Doesn't make much sense to me, but hey it's your life, not mine.

I think in the end it all boils down to how you were raised and your ideals on how women and men should procreate. I know the main consensus around the world is:

Woman who sleeps around = slut.
Man who sleeps around = playa playa.

To me, that's just unfair.

I figure, if you've slept with a lot of people, but you genuinely liked all those people, then you're not a slut.


My idea of a slut is someone who sleeps around just to sleep around. Which one are you?

This theory can work for and against both sexes.

 

[drixsa]

Originally posted by TillTheEndOfTime
This makes no sense at all. There is no such thing as a "man *****" or "man slut".

Why not? Men and women get the same urges for sex and women are just as horny if not hornier (sp?) then men. If there is no female slut then there is no male slut. The whole idea of being a slut is one that society has labeled it as.

We were programmed and designed for sex.

So are women.

The fact that we can purge and regenerate billions of our sperm a week is a testament to this.

Just because we can physically impregnate 100 girls a day (though you'd probably hate sex after that) it doesn't make it ok to do.

Double standard? Take it up with mother nature if you got a problem with that.

The problem here is that you are arguing laws of society with laws of nature and they do not mix. Urge is urge and not acting on that urge is having self control. Regardless if the urge is a male's or a female's it makes no difference. Arguing that women can only be sluts because they ovulate only a couple times a month and can't constantly be making children is ridiculous, its not as if their urges go away when they aren't ovulating.

Just because I have pen!s doesn't make it morally acceptable for me to go out and use it on every girl i can.

But because i do not it makes me selective in whom i have sex with. If I were to fvck every girl that came my way i would be a slut.

Though to be honest, most guys are sluts who don't have the opportunity to be so. Even it is some random girl, whom they have talked to for 5 minutes they would still be happy to fvck her without a condom.

Originally posted by TillTheEndOfTime
Disagree. I see a big difference. A man who sleeps with 100 women is giving in to his natural urges.

What i have been trying to ask is, what makes that ok? Say, I get the urge to kill certain people or atleast beat them senseless. Is that ok?

A women who sleeps with 100 men is a new aged, "sexually liberated" feminazi who is fighting her natural urge to select the most suitable mate.

Women have more than one urge as do men. One of those urges is to follow those hormones. Exactly the same thing that guys do. It is not as if women all of a sudden are having open sexual relationships. It has been done for hundreds and thousands of years but it has never been as open or as accepted until now.

There is a reason why the definition of wh0re/slut is written explicity in the context of a female person.

Yes, because of society's label of them. There were male *****s back in the day but there were not as many. Though the title at hand is not *****s it is sluts.

Saying "manwh0re/man slut" makes just about as much sense as saying "dark bright light" or "shallow deep pool".

Also, known as an oxymoron but I don't get how you have gotten to this conclusion. Explain this...

 

[Not Quite There]

personally, i think the whole slvt thing boils down to this.

a man has to go through a lot to get sex, i.e time, money, energy, effort etc...

all a women (even an ugly one) needs to do to get sex is too stop saying no.

therefore it is expected that women should have more control over there desires.

think of it this way, a man could go out every day of the year looking for sex, no matter how good looking/rich/or a don juan he was, it is unlikely he would always get it.

Where as a woman could go out every day of the year looking for sex, and probably would get it every day.

 

[Climax]

The world is f*cked up, accept it, and adapt...

All i have to say, is:

Live each day as if it were your last! ... When the time comes to get married, THEN worry about finding yourself a "not so used" girl And trust me, there are PLENTY of them around, all you have to do is look


Laterz....