Islam: religion of war

[Jaylan]

Here we go again. "Why is islam the religion of terrorism and conquest?" Cuz of the west. "Why does anyone do anything bad or anything bad happen?" Cuz whites.Islam has always been that way since it's founding in 700ad. The only thing you can do with it is to contain it. Which was the policy until about the 1960's. You're partly right, liberals and conservatives have both encouraged islam's spread and meddle in the middle east too much.

And another thing there's no "maturing" islam short of converting. Also whether Islam theoretically worships the same god as Judiasm and Christianity is irrelevant. They don't worship their god or gods the same way and don't describe him the same way. So one or more of them is wrong.

Are you stupid or do you just refuse to read? And do you just refuse to educated yourself? And its pathetic that I have said NOTHING about race...and youre trying to bring you racial whining bullsh!t into this thread.

How about you directly address the points Ive made and tell me where I was wrong. Its historical fact that the UK and USA backed a coup in Iran in the 50s. Its historical fact that foreigners backed coups in Afghanistan. Its fact that the Soviets invaded and that the USA armed fighters who would later become the Taliban. I bring up the Soviets meddling as well...and your response is "wah wah cus west"?

What is wrong about any of those historical facts? Find me information that states that is wrong. Why whine and make lame retorts like you just did?

There was a time when Christianity was used to run around killing masses of people. There was a time when religion was used in this country even, as an excuse to discriminate against anyone with the wrong skin color and background. But I dont believe Islam will be the way it currently is forever. Especially considering how Turkey and Indonesia are Muslim nations with moderate politics, rights for women, and dont have citizens who travel abroad all the time to blow people up. The West has a huge problem with the Middle East...and a lot of it is down to foreign policy.

So yes, along with the fact that Islam needs to mature out of its Dark Ages behavior, Western meddling has led to dictatorial or Islamist in areas around the world. Or do you forget there was a time when the USA and UK backed the dictator known as Saddam Hussein?

Now hes gone and Islamists are trying to take over Iraq. Yeah...Western work at its finest Good job containing the Islamists by illegal ousting (again) the only guy keeping them in check.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Look, the point is whether or not a country outside the middle east meddles or not in that region it's going to have upheavals and islams going to continue to be the religion of conquest as it always has been. No one else is fundamentally to blame for how that region is but the people and religion in it. The only thing that can be done is to contain, weaken and stop feeding the beast.

taiyuu, we are helping the muslims. We're inviting them into western countries and trying to contain them once in the countries. What makes you think Europe or the US couldn't completely contain muslims or anyone else if they wanted to? If any of them tried to invade conventionally they'd be destroyed in days like the Gulf war. Islam spreads into the west only by invitation and immigration. I don't say immigration and multiculturalism is colonization for nothing. The real problem is the one world order globalism and multiculturalism policy.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

The only thing that can be done is to contain, weaken and stop feeding the beast.

Yea, good luck with that.

Muslim Population To Equal Christians In 50 Years

But you guys are missing biggest religious problem. The third largest religion, Hinduism.

Hindus will be third, making up 14.9 percent of the world's total population,

Why is this a problem?

Because the God Shiva, by His Own admission, is The Destroy Of Worlds

You can run, but you can't hide.

 

[amoka]

Same old folks whining about religion, race, and the American exceptionalism. Some of you folks need to get out of your trailer parks and mingle with people of different believe, culture, and religion.

 

[Mike32ct]

Jaylan,

There is no doubt that the US has meddled in foreign affairs and opened up many cans of worms in the process.

But all Islamist violence can't be blamed on the US. Countries all over the world are facing this problem, even in places where the US has NOT intervened. Some of these places are located far from the Middle East. China is dealing with some Islamists. The Philipines (where the US is no longer really active) has issues with Islamists in the south. Is the US responsible for Boko Haram in Africa? Is the US responsible for Chechen Islamists too?

The US was attacked by Islamist Barbary Pirates in our early days before we ever intervened internationally.

While Turkey has traditionally been a US ally and a moderate Muslim country, that is actually starting to reverse as their government is leaning more Islamist these days.

 

[YawataNoKami]

Same old folks whining about religion, race, and the American exceptionalism. Some of you folks need to get out of your trailer parks and mingle with people of different believe, culture, and religion.

All liberals should be dropped in Iraq, Afghan, Pakistan or Syria for a month. Let's see how they feel with a dose of reality. If their big mouths don't get them shot before the month is up!

Why is it that terrorist Islamist groups are able to READILY recruit TENS OF THOUSANDS of eager followers (not just the stupid and hopeless; but well-educated people) across all nations, across all cultures, across the globe, to fight and/or martyr themselves like a flock of mindless, hateful lemmings?
This has been going on FOR DECADES, despite the worldwide disgust at their behavior.

You couldn't even get a mere town square full of idiot Ku Klux Klan members to get together; much less racist skinheads, insane violent Zionists, Black Supremacists, Black Panthers ,Tamil Tigers, etc. to equal the numbers or the zeal in which the radical Islamist Death Machine has expanded.
This phenomenon is UNIQUE to Islam.
Detractors... you have NO legitimate argument against these FACTS.
Quit trying to defend that yours is a culture of peace, when it is abundantly clear THAT IT IS NOT.

Muslims cannot be trusted for a number of reasons; mainly, they cannot seperate state from religion. They may be American, they may be British or whatever, however when it comes to the crunch they will support their Muslim `Brothers` and forget their nationality. We simply don`t really `know` them, even though you may think you have known them for years; eventually the real person will emerge. If you want an example, take a look at the war that tore apart the former Yugoslavia in the mid 1990`s; Serbs, Croats and Bosnian Muslims who had lived side by side for years were suddenly killing each other. It began with issues of `state` but quickly became religious as well; it could happen in any country where there is a Muslim population; the US is unfortunate in the fact that there are so many of them living here they will eventually outbreed us; remember their sworn aim is to impose sharia law over the whole world.
Trust them if you want to, but keep one careful eye open at all times.

If you are non muslim you must be killed. Radical muslim will kill you, moderate muslim will watch you die. "Peaceful" muslim...........do they exist?

 

[amoka]

Muslims cannot be trusted for a number of reasons; mainly, they cannot seperate state from religion.

Neither do the Christians. Read the news and follow current events, son. Both Muslims and bible-loving Christian alike "cannot be trusted [because] they cannot separate state from religion." Both groups are delusional...one is just more delusional than the other.

 

[( . )( . )]

Same old folks whining about religion, race, and the American exceptionalism. Some of you folks need to get out of your trailer parks and mingle with people of different believe, culture, and religion.

Same old passive aggressive anti-white cult-Marx pantsh!tter.

Neither do the Christians. Read the news and follow current events, son.

Oh boy those Christians cutting off heads and blowing sh!t up again.

Grow some balls "son". It's not "Christians" you're angry at though is it amoka? We pretended it was the "Christians" last time until you ended up flipping out and told us all that white people deserve their genocide, shutting the thread down. How about we skip the "Christian" boogeyman this time and just go straight to what's really on your mind . Spare us this song and dance again eh?

 

[Stagger Lee]

Some people don't know history and how Islam began. Islam from its beginning in the late 600s was spreading by conquest through out the middle east and N. Africa. Then the muslims began invading Europe (no the Europeans, white people or the non-existent US didn't make them do it). In 732, Charles Martel's kingdom defeated the Islamic invaders at Poitiers France. Nothing about islam has changed since except that now they are allowed to spread to the West by immigration.

when-the-muslims-nearly-conquered-europe

Had Martel been defeated, the Muslims could have swept through Western Europe forcing conversion by the sword. His force represented the only organized defense. No other kingdom nor population had the ability to resist. If not for Charles Martel, it is highly likely that the western world would be Islamic today.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Neither do the Christians. Read the news and follow current events, son. Both Muslims and bible-loving Christian alike "cannot be trusted [because] they cannot separate state from religion." Both groups are delusional...one is just more delusional than the other.

The US has been Christian since it's beginning in 1600 and has kept religion and church separate. It's progressives that insert their morals and beliefs into the government and constitution and enforce their morals on everyone else especially since the '60s.

 

[Jaylan]

The US has been Christian since it's beginning in 1600 and has kept religion and church separate. It's progressives that insert their morals and beliefs into the government and constitution and enforce their morals on everyone else especially since the '60s.

Many of the founding fathers were deists, not Christians, and wanted separation of church and state. Do your research. The US is not a theocracy and should never be.

Keep that bullsh!t out of our politics. It was in fact Christians in the USA who tried to use the bible to excuse racism, sexism, and all kinds of intolerance in the past. This is historical fact.

Youre quite ignorant of the constitution and the history of American politics if you think progressives were the first to inject morals and beliefs into government. Thats been happening since the country's founding, and happens in every government. The Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford is a perfect example of when bigots have injected their backward beliefs into American politics.

But yeah, how dare progressives want people to have better rights in this nation. No wonder fools like you say you want the USA to be stuck in 1955. A time where women were stuck at home with fewer rights, when gays and minorities could be systematically denied basic rights (before voting act of 1965), a time when it was ok to frame or kill someone who was not of the majority class and the police help cover it up (Emmet Till).

Boohoo....at progressives making the nation a place where more Americans of various backgrounds had basic rights. How dare women get better educations, hold down good jobs, and have the casual sex they have with guys like me today. Yeah...lets go back to before the 60s...where youre married by 23 and already popping out kids by 25. How fun!

Oh the joy to be latched to one woman during my prime years of youth and energy. Oh the joy of knowing Id have to sneak around if I ever wanted some variety. Oh the joy of knowing if I bailed, Id still be paying alimony on top of child support because back then women never really had their own cash.

 

[( . )( . )]

Many of the founding fathers were deists, not Christians, and wanted separation of church and state. Do your research. The US is not a theocracy and should never be.

The sh!tlibs historical revisionism I noticed you were careful to use the words "is not" and not "was not" you sneaky fugger Stop pretending this indoctrinated influx of weak whyte internet atheists we are seeing now was always around gaylan. This self-hating, anti-family, anti-Western, anti-neighbor/community, anti-life embracement is a NEW phenomenon. We weren't always this pozzed.

http://www.usachristianministries.com/us-history-quotes-about-god-and-the-bible/

 

[Stagger Lee]

Many of the founding fathers were deists, not Christians, and wanted separation of church and state. Do your research. The US is not a theocracy and should never be.

Keep that bullsh!t out of our politics. It was in fact Christians in the USA who tried to use the bible to excuse racism, sexism, and all kinds of intolerance in the past. This is historical fact.

I'm not getting into your revisionist history debate. Many of them were Christian but my point is they always kept the church and state separate.

What's really dirty is for to try to claim Christian principles excused slavery and "racism" and "sexism" when it's just the opposite. The framers of the constitution who you call "deist" sidestepped the morality of slavery and kept a separation of morals or church and state. From 1790 to 1850's the federal government and politics did not impose morality. It was progressives starting in the 1850s abolitionist and onward who first started to impose morality Christian or otherwise through the federal government and politics.

Youre quite ignorant of the constitution and the history of American politics if you think progressives were the first to inject morals and beliefs into government. Thats been happening since the country's founding, and happens in every government. The Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford is a perfect example of when bigots have injected their backward beliefs into American politics.

No you're ignorant of the original constitutional intent and history of American politics. Actually Taney correctly interpreted the constitution and politics at the time in 1850, ie States were delegated the authority individually to decide citizenship and slavery, not the federal government. Why do you think there was a need later for a Civil War and from 1866 onwards the 13, 14th, 15th, 19th and 24th constitutional amendments and other laws and Acts too numerous to mention if the constitution and former politics said what you think it meant?

With maybe the exception of the 14th amendment birthright citizenship now misapplied to noncitizen and illegals and the 19th amendment giving women the vote, not that I care about what changes happened prior to 1964. But I don't care for your false, revisionists history .

 

[speed dawg]

Many of the founding fathers were deists, not Christians, and wanted separation of church and state. Do your research. The US is not a theocracy and should never be.

Many....more like ONE: Thomas Jefferson, then a bunch of mfers who don't matter. He obviously was the biggest proponent of church and state. The US WAS founded as a Christian nation, and founded to get away from the legalist nature of the Church of England (or whatever it was over there that was so strict). It wasn't founded for islam and all this other sh*t. Either way, obviously Christians are good as separation of church and state because Christianity is damn near non-existent in government today. So cut the contradictions, you and your fairy butt-boy amoka.

Keep that bullsh!t out of our politics. It was in fact Christians in the USA who tried to use the bible to excuse racism, sexism, and all kinds of intolerance in the past. This is historical fact.

Bullcrap. How dare white people want to be around white people. Oh the horror. Certain churches are corrupt, and especially among the black community. Let's not link that to Christianity, nimrod, that's just PEOPLE period.

Youre quite ignorant of the constitution and the history of American politics if you think progressives were the first to inject morals and beliefs into government. Thats been happening since the country's founding, and happens in every government. The Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford is a perfect example of when bigots have injected their backward beliefs into American politics.

Again, liberals love blaming the majority for something one or two guys did. Just pointless.

But yeah, how dare progressives want people to have better rights in this nation. No wonder fools like you say you want the USA to be stuck in 1955. A time where women were stuck at home with few rights, when gays and minorities could be systematically denied basic rights (voting act of 1965), a time when it was ok to frame or kill someone who was not of the majority class and the police help cover it up (Emmet Till).

Again, MOST people tried to help find Till once he disappeared. You're blaming everyone for something only a few people in ONE small town did. Go ahead and try to test me on Till.....I'll bury you with facts.

Boohoo....at progressives making the nation a place where more Americans of various backgrounds had basic rights. How dare women get better educations, hold down good jobs, and have the casual sex they have with guys like me today. Yeah...lets go back to before the 60s...where youre married by 23 and already popping out kids by 25. How fun!

None of this makes any sense. Women are suited for most of the jobs they want, they are actually better suited as homemakers. Everything you list here leads to society degradation. Of course, that doesn't surprise me because you have zero morals and no skin in the game at all. Society was better before the 60s, nobody disagrees with that. There's a reason only young people think it's better now, because they don't know any better! Society has gotten markedly worse since I've gotten older, no doubt about that. Same for everyone. Your own parents would say the same.

Oh the joy to be latched to one woman during my prime years of youth and energy. Oh the joy of knowing Id have to sneak around if I ever wanted some variety. Oh the joy of knowing if I bailed, Id still be paying alimony on top of child support because back then women never really had their own cash.

What year are you thinking about fool? 2015?

 

[Jaylan]

I'm not getting into your revisionist history debate. Many of them were Christian but my point is they always kept the church and state separate.

Then if they always kept it separate...then it should always be that way. Problem is the religious right is always trying to inject religion into politics. Fvk that noise. And those Indiana and Arkansas laws were rejected by the people and amended.

No you're ignorant of the original constitutional intent and history of American politics. Actually Taney correctly interpreted the constitution and politics at the time in 1850, ie States were delegated the authority individually to decide citizenship and slavery, not the federal government. Why do you think there was a need later for a Civil War and from 1866 onwards the 13, 14th, 15th, 19th and 24th constitutional amendments and other laws and Acts too numerous to mention if the constitution and former politics said what you think it meant?

With maybe the exception of the 19th amendment giving women the vote, not that I care about what changes happened prior to 1964. But I don't care for your false, revisionists history .

Gimme a fvking break with this states rights bullsh!t. This was garbage used to discriminate against people.

There is no false revisionist history by anyone but yourself. In the past azzhole bigots injected morality and beliefs into politics long before progressives did. They applied the constitution in unequal and discriminatory fashion. Which is why so many amendments and federal laws were enacted to remedy the hateful bullsh!t.

While you mouth off about progressives all the time, they are a large part of why more than just one class of Americans have rights nowadays.

 

[( . )( . )]

There is no false revisionist history by anyone...

The founding fathers according to gaylan.

http://i.imgur.com/LJRJllB.jpg

 

[VikingKing]

Then if they always kept it separate...then it should always be that way. Problem is the religious right is always trying to inject religion into politics. Fvk that noise. And those Indiana and Arkansas laws were rejected by the people and amended.

Gimme a fvking break with this states rights bullsh!t. This was garbage used to discriminate against people.

There is no false revisionist history by anyone but yourself. In the past azzhole bigots injected morality and beliefs into politics long before progressives did. They applied the constitution in unequal and discriminatory fashion. Which is why so many amendments and federal laws were enacted to remedy the hateful bullsh!t.

While you mouth off about progressives all the time, they are a large part of why more than just one class of Americans have rights nowadays.

What about the fact whites are not protected under hate crime laws, or discrimination laws?

 

[Jaylan]

Many....more like ONE: Thomas Jefferson, then a bunch of mfers who don't matter. He obviously was the biggest proponent of church and state. The US WAS founded as a Christian nation, and founded to get away from the legalist nature of the Church of England (or whatever it was over there that was so strict). It wasn't founded for islam and all this other sh*t. Either way, obviously Christians are good as separation of church and state because Christianity is damn near non-existent in government today. So cut the contradictions, you and your fairy butt-boy amoka.

So if they werent Christian you just label them as "mfers who dont matter". This highlights your ignorance and inability to accept any sort of truth contrary to your religiosity.

The US is NOT a Christian nation. Get that through your head. Separation of church and state means exactly that. By labeling it a Christian nation, clearly you dont believe in the American values of staying away from theocratic national rule.

And Christianity is not non-existant in government today. The damn GOP base is all about injecting that stuff into our politics. From gays, to abortion, to school curriculum. But you lot are losing the battle. And Im damn glad.

Bullcrap. How dare white people want to be around white people. Oh the horror. Certain churches are corrupt, and especially among the black community. Let's not link that to Christianity, nimrod, that's just PEOPLE period.

This is NOT about white people being around white people. This is about racists, sexist, and all bigots of the past using the Bible as an excuse for slavery, denying women rights, Jim Crow, bashing gays and a whole slew of other things.

There is factual historical information that quotes people using the Bible and interpreting Gods word to label others inferior. Hell, it wasnt until 30 years ago that Mormons allowed Blacks to be in church leadership positions. For the longest time they saw Blacks as cursed descendents of Cain. And yes, mainstream Christians used this as an excuse for slavery back in the day. This is historical fact.

Tell me again how the Bible and religion was not used to discriminate.

Again, liberals love blaming the majority for something one or two guys did. Just pointless.

Pointless? Reading comprehension is not your friend is it? I brought up Dred Scott to prove the point that people were injected beliefs and morals into politics and law long before progressives have.

Stagger whined about progressives pushing their morals with politics...and I provided an example of bigots doing the same thing long before modern progressives came about. Politics and law are always shaped by peoples beliefs and morals.

Again, MOST people tried to help find Till once he disappeared. You're blaming everyone for something only a few people in ONE small town did. Go ahead and try to test me on Till.....I'll bury you with facts.

Bullsh!t. The Emmet Till murder was a representative picture of a larger racial issue in the racist south. And some people looked for Emmet. Not most. And the fact that the towns police and leadership covered it up and were even involved in the murder says a whole lot.

How about the Little Rock 9? The fact that the fvking national guard has to be called in so kids can go to school is some sh!t aint it?

But according to you before the 1960s things werent so bad.

None of this makes any sense. Women are suited for most of the jobs they want, they are actually better suited as homemakers. Everything you list here leads to society degradation. Of course, that doesn't surprise me because you have zero morals and no skin in the game at all. Society was better before the 60s, nobody disagrees with that. There's a reason only young people think it's better now, because they don't know any better! Society has gotten markedly worse since I've gotten older, no doubt about that. Same for everyone. Your own parents would say the same.

Society was better before the 60s? According to who? Really only according to a certain group of whiny white dudes who feel theyve lost their place in society.

The vast VAST majority of Americans know modern times are a alot better. More people have rights and liberty than every before in this nation. Youre an idiot if you think society was better for Americans prior to the 60s.

I have no skin in the game? Motherfvker I have family who grew up in the deep south prior to the 60s. You wouldnt believe some of the bullsh!t they dealt with. Trust me, I have plenty skin in the game. America is definitely a better society nowadays because now its not legal to treat non white christian males as second class citizens.

What year are you thinking about fool? 2015?

I was talking about pre 1960s. A time when alimony was a fvking given if a man divorced his wife. Fvk the pre-60s. I much enjoy not being socially pressured and shamed into early marriage. I like being able to have casual sex with different women if I so choose. I like being able to divorce a woman and having a much lesser probability of being forced to pay alimony (because in modern times she should have her own fvking money).

What about the fact whites are not protected under hate crime laws, or discrimination laws?

All people are protected under anti discrimination laws. Where the fvk have you been or read such bullsh!t that you think whites are not protected? Have you read any of the federal laws? Because they protect people of all races. How about you cite what youre stating.

 

[VikingKing]

So if they werent Christian you just label them as "mfers who dont matter". This highlights your ignorance and inability to accept any sort of truth contrary to your religiosity.

The US is NOT a Christian nation. Get that through your head. Separation of church and state means exactly that. By labeling it a Christian nation, clearly you dont believe in the American values of staying away from theocratic national rule.

And Christianity is not non-existant in government today. The damn GOP base is all about injecting that stuff into our politics. From gays, to abortion, to school curriculum. But you lot are losing the battle. And Im damn glad.
This is NOT about white people being around white people. This is about racists, sexist, and all bigots of the past using the Bible as an excuse for slavery, denying women rights, Jim Crow, bashing gays and a whole slew of other things.

There is factual historical information that quotes people using the Bible and interpreting Gods word to label others inferior. Hell, it wasnt until 30 years ago that Mormons allowed Blacks to be in church leadership positions. For the longest time they saw Blacks as cursed descendents of Cain. And yes, mainstream Christians used this as an excuse for slavery back in the day. This is historical fact.

Tell me again how the Bible and religion was not used to discriminate.
Pointless? Reading comprehension is not your friend is it? I brought up Dred Scott to prove the point that people were injected beliefs and morals into politics and law long before progressives have.

Stagger whined about progressives pushing their morals with politics...and I provided an example of bigots doing the same thing long before modern progressives came about. Politics and law are always shaped by peoples beliefs and morals.


Bullsh!t. The Emmet Till murder was a representative picture of a larger racial issue in the racist south. And some people looked for Emmet. Not most. And the fact that the towns police and leadership covered it up and were even involved in the murder says a whole lot.

How about the Little Rock 9? The fact that the fvking national guard has to be called in so kids can go to school is some sh!t aint it?

But according to you before the 1960s things werent so bad.

Society was better before the 60s? According to who? Really only according to a certain group of whiny white dudes who feel theyve lost their place in society.

The vast VAST majority of Americans know modern times are a alot better. More people have rights and liberty than every before in this nation. Youre an idiot if you think society was better for Americans prior to the 60s.

I have no skin in the game? Motherfvker I have family who grew up in the deep south prior to the 60s. You wouldnt believe some of the bullsh!t they dealt with. Trust me, I have plenty skin in the game. America is definitely a better society nowadays because now its not legal to treat non white christian males as second class citizens.

I was talking about pre 1960s. A time when alimony was a fvking given if a man divorced his wife. Fvk the pre-60s. I much enjoy not being socially pressured and shamed into early marriage. I like being able to have casual sex with different women if I so choose. I like being able to divorce a woman and having a much lesser probability of being forced to pay alimony (because in modern times she should have her own fvking money).
All people are protected under anti discrimination laws. Where the fvk have you been or read such bullsh!t that you think whites are not protected? Have you read any of the federal laws? Because they protect people of all races. How about you cite what youre stating.

The way its drafted one claim what you just claimed. However the way it's enforced is entirely different.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOABBn5Tnm0

Your boy, eric holder, says that it only covers crimes that have a historic basis, such as crimes against minority groups such as blacks, gays/ trans, muslims ect.

If you watch that video the senator lists off crimes against whites and christians that were not treated as hate crimes, when they clearly were. So why is it the only crimes pursued as hate crimes are ones that are white/ heterosexuals on a minority group?

For example any violence committed against a white person in light of the Ferguson incident should be treated as a hate crime.

Black on white crimes are clearly ignored by the media yet white on black "crimes" are targeted by the media. Blacks are baited into race hate. Therefore it could be said that any black on white crimes should be considered hate crimes because its obvious, as every one can see in the media, that blacks are being encouraged to believe in things like white privilege (that all whites have some privilege that minorities don't). That every white cop that shoots a black one is due to the cop being racist.

Clearly at the very least, a black man may committed a crime against a white person that he would have committed against any random person, but due to the large scale of race baiting against white people, he will rationalize it in his mind as its ok because the white person has white privilege and therefore making it racially motivated, and therefore a hate crime.

There is far more black on white crimes committed, so there should be more blacks be charged with hate crimes and being locked up and made an example of until they stop committing these hate crimes against the white race.

 

[Jaylan]

Bullsh!t. The way its enforced is not "entirely different".

Here's an example of a white supervisor winning a discrimination case against his employer. All these discrimination cases can be further researched on different law sites. And mind you, that Lockheed Martin case was in the aftermath of a racist bigot going on a shooting spree at a Lockheed plant a couple years prior.

So Lockheed had been very sensitive about anything racial being said by white employees. So if a white guy can successfully win against Lockheed Martin following a mudering racist shooting massacre at one of their plants...I dont know what youre going on about regarding whites supposedly not being protected by anti-discrimination laws.

And of course the best you can do now is spin the conversation towards discussing crime stats. I thought we were also talking about anti-discrimination laws? Its funny how you guys dont get sick of that red herring. Believe whatever you wish though. I dunno why I took the time to reply to you, just a waste of time. Have fun on the forums tonight...Im gonna go out and meet some ladies

PS - Yeah, cops are never racist or xenophobic azzholes.