Link is here:
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/is-your-girlfriend-ovulating-watch-out/
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/is-your-girlfriend-ovulating-watch-out/
Roissy said:
Is Your Girlfriend Ovulating? Watch Out!
- Thread starter runner83
- Start date
Jeffst1980
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 834
- Reaction score
- 131
More fear mongering from the Roissy blog...
The level of hyper vigilance the author suggests is ridiculous. What high status male would take all the time to monitor their girlfriend's cycle, and administer affection or criticism accordingly, in an attempt to dissuade her from cheating? Why be in a relationship in the first place if it causes you that much stress?
Not to mention, the study cited in that video is more questionable social science. The conclusions were based on the fact that the ovulating women in LTRs showed more skin and danced more provocatively...in a LABORATORY setting. What's more, they didn't measure the same stats at different times of the same woman's cycle to get an individual "baseline." The women that showed the most skin and behaved most sexually were probably by and large the most attractive women, as women with average bodies tend to cover up more. I believe there is truth to the notion that women are more sexual when ovulating, but this study is a piece of crap. There are numerous interpretations for those "results."
I think Roissy has SOME good ideas, but he projects WAY too much his own paranoia on his dating advice. He's kind of like the Glen Beck of dating advice, actually--living in his head and out of touch with reality.
Here's another example from the same author- "Chateau"--: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/dread/
"I estimate 1% of all men and 2% of all women meet their soulmates. The reason for the discrepancy is that male soulmates are in shorter supply than female soulmates."
^^^It's always a pleasure to hear someone quantify an imaginary concept using scientific terms. Here's some more "advice" for maintaining a relationship:
"Have a threesome. Spend an inordinate amount of time admiring the labia of the other woman. Be sure to moan louder with her. WARNING: If you *** on the other woman you will have to spend weeks consoling your girlfriend."
^^^More advice that comes not from actual flesh-and-blood interactions, but from an overactive imagination.
The problem with the internet is that ANYONE can claim to be an expert when giving advice, and it's easy to imagine circumstances in which such advice would be effective when heeded. Similarly, you can easily corroborate ANY statement with "scientific" evidence. We all have our biases- myself included- so everything you read should be taken with a grain of salt.
The level of hyper vigilance the author suggests is ridiculous. What high status male would take all the time to monitor their girlfriend's cycle, and administer affection or criticism accordingly, in an attempt to dissuade her from cheating? Why be in a relationship in the first place if it causes you that much stress?
Not to mention, the study cited in that video is more questionable social science. The conclusions were based on the fact that the ovulating women in LTRs showed more skin and danced more provocatively...in a LABORATORY setting. What's more, they didn't measure the same stats at different times of the same woman's cycle to get an individual "baseline." The women that showed the most skin and behaved most sexually were probably by and large the most attractive women, as women with average bodies tend to cover up more. I believe there is truth to the notion that women are more sexual when ovulating, but this study is a piece of crap. There are numerous interpretations for those "results."
I think Roissy has SOME good ideas, but he projects WAY too much his own paranoia on his dating advice. He's kind of like the Glen Beck of dating advice, actually--living in his head and out of touch with reality.
Here's another example from the same author- "Chateau"--: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/dread/
"I estimate 1% of all men and 2% of all women meet their soulmates. The reason for the discrepancy is that male soulmates are in shorter supply than female soulmates."
^^^It's always a pleasure to hear someone quantify an imaginary concept using scientific terms. Here's some more "advice" for maintaining a relationship:
"Have a threesome. Spend an inordinate amount of time admiring the labia of the other woman. Be sure to moan louder with her. WARNING: If you *** on the other woman you will have to spend weeks consoling your girlfriend."
^^^More advice that comes not from actual flesh-and-blood interactions, but from an overactive imagination.
The problem with the internet is that ANYONE can claim to be an expert when giving advice, and it's easy to imagine circumstances in which such advice would be effective when heeded. Similarly, you can easily corroborate ANY statement with "scientific" evidence. We all have our biases- myself included- so everything you read should be taken with a grain of salt.
Scaramouche
Master Don Juan
dear Runner,
This is not my experience of Ladies,in general yes they are horny at the time of ovulation,but in my experience only moderately so,certainly rarely peaking then...A good trick for you young guys is to check the viscosity of their Pvssy Juices,this should be done after arousal but before penetration....
you simply get Pvssy juice between thumb and second finger and check how far apart this "Spin"will extend....check me out on the net but if it is longer than usual,I will not state a length,then take extra precautions....I always carry a Morning after Pill which I get from a Lady Doctor Friend,as even at my age these freakin condoms doo break....Take care Brothers and remember,condom or no condom,after the dirty deed,wash thoroughly in Surgical soap.
This is not my experience of Ladies,in general yes they are horny at the time of ovulation,but in my experience only moderately so,certainly rarely peaking then...A good trick for you young guys is to check the viscosity of their Pvssy Juices,this should be done after arousal but before penetration....
you simply get Pvssy juice between thumb and second finger and check how far apart this "Spin"will extend....check me out on the net but if it is longer than usual,I will not state a length,then take extra precautions....I always carry a Morning after Pill which I get from a Lady Doctor Friend,as even at my age these freakin condoms doo break....Take care Brothers and remember,condom or no condom,after the dirty deed,wash thoroughly in Surgical soap.
Yes, I do agree that the study may not be clear cut scientifically, and depending on your point of view, Roissy may be a bit over the top.Jeffst1980 said:
But it was to draw attention to the fact that ANY women can be prone to cheating on her established partner to get the best genes for her children, due to biological imperatives that may be beyond her control.
So I think it is still something to be aware of, since you don't want to end up like this guy:
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/female-rapists/
Colossus
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 3,505
- Reaction score
- 547
I agree. Roissy is a clever writer but he also projects his own delusional adversarial views into everything. Mark my words, that guy has serious women issues. His fear of getting hurt is epic. You can be the slickest PUA in town and still be fuct in the head.Jeffst1980 said:
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,074
- Reaction score
- 8,922
I find myself agreeing with Colossus again.Colossus said:
Nobody wants to get hurt, but if you get hurt, so what?
Is it that big a frigging deal?
You don't get through life without some pain, and what doesn't hurt you makes you stronger.
A lot of guys here act like if you get hurt in a relationship, it's the end of the fricking world. Man the F up.
Once you get your heart broken a few times you realize it isn't going to kill you. No risk, no reward. No pain, no gain.
Rollo Tomassi
Master Don Juan
Roissy is correct in principle, but wrong in practice.
All he's doing (again) is remunerating the importance of competition anxiety in maintaining a healthy relationship. I've advocated (and practiced) this for years, but where Roissy fails is in his need for such vigilance. What Roissy calls "dread" I'd call "competition anxiety", but the difference is one is overt and the other covert. A constant overarching sense of impending doom is untenable in any relationship (for anyone with a healthy psyche), but subtle, hinted, nuanced, covert competition anxiety sparks women's imaginations - your most useful DJ tool.
Beware the gifts that are too easily won. Women value attention, but the only attention worthwhile is earned by what they'd like to believe is due to their feminine charms.
All he's doing (again) is remunerating the importance of competition anxiety in maintaining a healthy relationship. I've advocated (and practiced) this for years, but where Roissy fails is in his need for such vigilance. What Roissy calls "dread" I'd call "competition anxiety", but the difference is one is overt and the other covert. A constant overarching sense of impending doom is untenable in any relationship (for anyone with a healthy psyche), but subtle, hinted, nuanced, covert competition anxiety sparks women's imaginations - your most useful DJ tool.
Beware the gifts that are too easily won. Women value attention, but the only attention worthwhile is earned by what they'd like to believe is due to their feminine charms.