Is our teaching AFC's how to get women going against the natural order?

[Mistic]

Do you suppose there is possibly a reason why 10% of men get 90% of women. Is this just a coincidence, or part of an intelligent design within nature that ensures survival of the fittest?

By teaching this stuff to guys who are not natural DJ's, are we not possibly working to further deplete the gene pool.

Let's face it, selective breeding is how we as humans develop superior species of plants and animals. Nature itself has this idea in practice. So it would stand to reason that we may be interfering with the process.

 

[KontrollerX]

Nope.

We humans have minds that allow us to change our fates and those of others unlike the lesser animals.

Doing what we do with those minds is a part of what is natural for us.

 

[Warrior74]

you take that 10% crap for fact. thats against the natural order of things.

 

[Nighthawk]

In the past there was a higher percentage of 'regular guys' who did okay with women because they hadn't been brainwashed into rejecting their masculinity. But there have always been weak men who allowed themselves to be dominated by women.

 

[lookyoung]

Because men are a joke these days. I would like everyone to walk into any nightclub or bar and you will see its a haven for AFC's. Man I feel sorry for woman now a days. The guys they have to choose from is just terrible. But its good for us. The less competition the better.

 

[woods]

Humanity is in a state of deevolution anyways. It's the stupid, weak people who are breeding the most. Besides, we create our own nature these days. We aren't animals, and it's not about testosterone anymore

If we want to work with evolution, we should sterilize everyone, and make them pass an IQ test, and give them an ethical and financial screening before letting them procreate. It should be that intelligent, good hearted people should be the ones spreading their genes, if the human race is to continue.

 

[ketostix]

Humanity is in a state of deevolution anyways. It's the stupid, weak people who are breeding the most. Besides, we create our own nature these days. We aren't animals, and it's not about testosterone anymore

If we want to work with evolution, we should sterilize everyone, and make them pass an IQ test, and give them an ethical and financial screening before letting them procreate. It should be that intelligent, good hearted people should be the ones spreading their genes, if the human race is to continue.

Yeah I don't buy that women select the best genetic guys. For most of human history women didn't really have the choice. I think women are poor at choosing the best quality male.

 

[The Bat]

I can see now that if I presented you with Nazi logic for eliminating jews and gypsies, you (OP) would definitely agree. I mean, let's face it. The "superior, fittest beings" Aryan concept was what fueled the Nazi propaganda. They believed that jews, gypsies, and homosexuals are not superior and not furthering natural order of things so let's eliminate them.

This is one of the worst threads I've seen on MM forum. Where are all these idiots coming from and posting on here?

 

[reset]

In the past there was a higher percentage of 'regular guys' who did okay with women because they hadn't been brainwashed into rejecting their masculinity

I agree. They may not have had the most confidence all around, but they probably benefited from not having that extra layer of BS rattling around in their heads.

Now it's all about qualifying to the woman. On this board too-- I have to be good looking, I have to be rich, I have to have social status--whatever. Even if those things can factor into it, all those ideas equal "what do I have to do to earn the right to be with a woman". Questioning what qualities the woman should have, almost never comes into the picture. Why would it, if you see women as Queen and yourself as servant. Your needs and requirements, what are those? As a guy I'm allowed to have standards? Do I deserve standards? Aren't I just a stupid caveman? I have years and years of apologizing for the opressing of women to do, I have to show them that I'm special and that I am not sexual. That's the only way they'll have sex with me. Blah.

That's not the natural order of things. That's denying your basic human nature and being ashamed to be a male human being. I saw the movie Superbad and there was a great example of this, at the party the guy is getting seduced by the chick, she is taking control, throwing herself at him, all the while he is trying to slow her down and make it mean too much, complimenting her, telling her how beautiful she is, and all she wants to do is screw. He was playing the female role. She was playing the male role, to compensate for the lack of masculinity he had, becasue he felt it was wrong to be a man. Then she asks why he's being such a bytch about it.

He's being such a bytch about it (as far as fictional characters go) because he grew up believing this BS about supplicating to women. /rant.

 

[ZenGodMod]

We have to help them!

How is the male species meant to survive if we let the rest of them roll over and play AFC?

The world will be infested with AFC-cies. That is the future we want? So a few of us can have bragging rights? Thats jerk mentality. THINK!

 

[Luthor Rex]

Humanity is in a state of deevolution anyways. It's the stupid, weak people who are breeding the most. Besides, we create our own nature these days. We aren't animals, and it's not about testosterone anymore

If we want to work with evolution, we should sterilize everyone, and make them pass an IQ test, and give them an ethical and financial screening before letting them procreate. It should be that intelligent, good hearted people should be the ones spreading their genes, if the human race is to continue.

Heck I'd settle for 'good heart' and responsible people.

 

[Mr. Me]

If we want to work with evolution, we should sterilize everyone, and make them pass an IQ test

But then there'd be no one left for me to laugh at.

It should be that intelligent, good hearted people should be the ones spreading their genes

Hell no! I'm NOT gonna pay all that child support!

 

[decades]

I suggest a class in remedial statistics. You may wish to consult with the Professor about "10% of the men getting 90% of the women." Hopefully he is one of the 10%.

 

[Knight's Cross]

Want to be reminded of a worse example? "Knocked Up" the movie. I haven't seen such AFC drivel since before Peter in "Office Space" made his transition to DJ. It's cr#p media and Hollywood at its worst, and I for 1 believe that SS is one of the places where guys can be enlightened. Whether they take the info and run with it is another story. 10% Ok that's cool, lets just not let that statistic get worse and even lower #'s of men act like men.

KC

 

[Mistic]

The "superior, fittest beings" Aryan concept was what fueled the Nazi propaganda. They believed that jews, gypsies, and homosexuals are not superior and not furthering natural order of things so let's eliminate them.

I only mentioned "selective breeding", not "selective eliminating." This thread is presented as a question. I simply raised it, I don't necessarily see it that way. The inspiration behind it is other threads where guys complain that no matter how hard they try, the y cant get good with women. So I can't help but consider that a natural force may be working against them. Don't get so carried away here.

Furthermore, if you reply in a thread that you feel was made by an idiot, doesn't that make you even more stupid? Notice that was another question.

 

[The Bat]

I only mentioned "selective breeding", not "selective eliminating." This thread is presented as a question. I simply raised it, I don't necessarily see it that way. The inspiration behind it is other threads where guys complain that no matter how hard they try, the y cant get good with women. So I can't help but consider that a natural force may be working against them. Don't get so carried away here.

Ok, you didn't mention that part.

Maybe the problem is the mere fact that these guys are trying too hard. They are taking DJ principles, which are supposed to represent how natural confidence is built and how it works, and artificially applying them. We've all seen these "posers" (too extreme of a word for the guys you mention though) who attempt to exude confidence, but deep down they fear their own mask.

Are you with me?

And next time, provide some ground work for the thought process or concept you come up with. :moon:

 

[Mistic]

^^^^ I'm open to all views, yours included

 

[edger]

The less competition the better.

I don't know how much longer that's gonna last, now that guys like Mystery, Neil Strauss, and sites like this are being exposed into the limelight. I'm glad these things exist to help other guys out there, but it's also a doubled edged sword too. But who cares. Everyone deserves to be exposed to it. It still won't stop me from referring guys to places like here, as well as telling them about guys like Mystery and Neil Strauss.

But I don't even consider Mystery to have that great of "game", after watching his pick-up video of that young chick "Sarah Garett"(lol) on YouTube. I thought he "pedestalized" her in that pick-up. But nevertheless, he still hooked the b*tch. But who knows if it was staged too. You never know. And also, who knows if he actually banged her. That's the real tellling if a guy "got" the chick.

If you didn't bang her, then you never "got" her. You might of hooked/reeled her in, but you never "got" her.

 

[STR8UP]

That's not the natural order of things. That's denying your basic human nature and being ashamed to be a male human being. I saw the movie Superbad and there was a great example of this, at the party the guy is getting seduced by the chick, she is taking control, throwing herself at him, all the while he is trying to slow her down and make it mean too much, complimenting her, telling her how beautiful she is, and all she wants to do is screw. He was playing the female role. She was playing the male role, to compensate for the lack of masculinity he had, becasue he felt it was wrong to be a man. Then she asks why he's being such a bytch about it.

Think about this for a second.

He wasn't assuming the "feminine" role. Women don't try to slow things down to make them mean something or compliment the guy....they simply exercise ASD. The guy wasn't using ASD, he was an AFC. He just didn't know any better. Most young guys like that don't.

I agree with the premise behind your statement though. Too often it's MEN who try to make it "meaningful" and assuming the feminine role.

 

[Rollo Tomassi]

Humanity is in a state of deevolution anyways. It's the stupid, weak people who are breeding the most. Besides, we create our own nature these days. We aren't animals, and it's not about testosterone anymore.

Heheh,..

So, tell me, does your prick still get hard when you look at porn?

Trust me, it's still about testosterone.