Pierce Manhammer
Moderator
Heat seeking moisture missile.As a Attack submarine.
Heat seeking moisture missile.As a Attack submarine.
Why do you think it's hard to maintain the extrovert vibe, does it it just get to be too much to match other extroverts, Is that even what you're tryna do at these events? Or do you just rather sit it out sometimes and just do things you like to do?INTJ when I tested... for years I thought I might be bi polar. Could go out... have a blast.. be “extroverted” then would feel like I had the life sucked out of me for a week or so... would need to be alone and didn’t want to socialize. My best friend is an extreme extrovert and i need very long breaks from him .. he doesn’t get it
What do you mean by smallest and hardest market to access?I'm an ESTP. I either have women that love me or hate me. If you are an INTJ then are basically Elon Musk and need to stay away from bars and clubs like the plague. INTJs probably have it the hardest out of the types because they have the smallest and hardest market to access.
Y’all are the non sexy nerds while INTPS & ENTPS are the more loveable nerds or Big Bang Type Nerds. Romantically you are compatible with INTPS & ENTPS, but good luck finding a female outside a college environment. Outside those types, the others will not find you sexy emotionally upon first meetings, so you will have to work on some manipulation tactics to overcome thisWhat do you mean by smallest and hardest market to access?
I go by the cognitive functions which are Carl Jung’s work. The letters are more of a book cover.You guys realize that there is a lack of science backing any of this up, with maybe the exception of extroversion vs introversion. The Big Five personality test has more backing.
I won't falt you there mate I'm absolutely hopless at the whole romantic aspect of it all and I appreciate your advice.Y’all are the non sexy nerds while INTPS & ENTPS are the more loveable nerds or Big Bang Type Nerds. Romantically you are compatible with INTPS & ENTPS, but good luck finding a female outside a college environment. Outside those types, the others will not find you sexy emotionally upon first meetings, so you will have to work on some manipulation tactics to overcome this
You can still find a girl attracted to you, but just understand that you might not win the first two battles lol. You need to primarily aim for sex within the first 2 dates to get a girl's investment.I won't falt you there mate I'm absolutely hopless at the whole romantic aspect of it all and I appreciate your advice.
This is why the letters are stupid and you go by the cognitive functions, they explain a much more complex definition of introversion and extroversion.Introvert/Extrovert is not a binary, it's a sliding scale.
I've had tests show that I'm 51% extroverted, which makes sense. Being around people doesn't drain me like it does hardcore introverts, and I don't shy away from personal interactions, but I despise being in or around large groups of people.
Socionics is a better system than MBTI; Socionics is a better interpretation of Carl Jung's work. That said, there is a lack of scientific backing.I go by the cognitive functions which are Carl Jung’s work. The letters are more of a book cover.
This is why professional psychologists think that Myers-Briggs is about as useful as a horoscope. It's more of an HR tool than a valid psych profile.This is why the letters are stupid and you go by the cognitive functions, they explain a much more complex definition of introversion and extroversion.
how is it any better? I’m literally going by terms from his book psychological types.Socionics is a better system than MBTI; Socionics is a better interpretation of Carl Jung's work. That said, there is a lack of scientific backing.
It's been a long time since I've read any of that material. If I remember correctly, Myers and Briggs screwed up Jung's interpretation of the eight different cognitive processes. Aushra Augustinavichiute formulated a more concise interpretation of Jung during the time of the Soviet Union, hence socionics is not well known in the west. With all of that said, it's still lacks any scientific backing.how is it any better? I’m literally going by terms from his book psychological types.
yeah I’m an ESTP because I concluded that my dominant functions were extroverted sensing and introverted thinking. I’ve also struggled with introverted intuition my whole life too. This sounds difficult to figure out, but using deductive reasoning simplifies the process. The whole point of the MBTI letters is to formulate a book cover for the whole process because it’s not sexy to say I’m extroverted sensing dominant. If I were to purely go by the tests than I wouldn’t get an ESTP, i’d get ISTP or INTJ more than likely.It's been a long time since I've read any of that material. If I remember correctly, Myers and Briggs screwed up Jung's interpretation of the eight different cognitive processes. Aushra Augustinavichiute formulated a more concise interpretation of Jung during the time of the Soviet Union, hence socionics is not well known in the west. With all of that said, it's still lacks any scientific backing.
You're an ESTp right?
Sensory-Logical Extratim - ESTp (The Conqueror)
Socionics is a step forward from MBTI(r) theory, which is a step forward from Personality Type, which is a step forward from Jungian Type, which is a step forward from...www.socionics.com
I think there is something that is going on regarding different cognitive processes in people, however, again, no one has figured out a scientific approach to figure these observations out.