Is banging this girl worth $3.7 million?

[mpimpin]

Her Sis looks pretty good.

 

[Deep Dish]

Yeah, but it's not all relative. $3.7 million could damn near feed an entire starving country.

$3.7 million would currently be worth $92.5 billion million dollars in Zimbabwe, but people have the liberty to spend money how they choose.

Many of the über-wealthy already donate mathematically significant funds to charities. Must every million dollars be spent virtuously? Why aren't you donating $25 a month to sponsor a starving African kid? Is anyone judgemental for you not to be donating money?

 

[speakeasy]

I'm with Dish and azanon.

- If someone offered this to you for $.25 would you say no? That's what it would be like to a super-wealthy individual. As Dish said, it's all relative.

- I actually respect the girl. What's the difference between a woman who DIRECTLY trades her body for a sum of money that caould carry her through the rest of life and one who INDIRECTLY sells it through the "proper" means most women do? the first one was honest and smarter.

As soon as you realize that ALL women are prostitutes, you begin to see the logic.

That's ridiculous. As if there's no love, or children or sacrifice or anything else that goes into a marriage. Or that the woman doesn't want sex as well. Hell these days it takes 2 good incomes to make it and many wives are financially contributing just as much as the man. Reducing marriage down to being no different than prostitution is just silly. There are many serious, committed people who end up married until death do them part and the husband can no longer get it up. We don't live in the leave it to ****** era anymore where the woman needs the guy's money and the guy needs the trophy wife to bang when he gets home from work. Might be true for a couple really wealthy guys, but these days, everyone has to work and contribute, male or female. And women like to fvck just as much as men do, only difference is they rather do it with someone they are in love with.

ps - WTF? B eaver got censored out? As in "Leave it to B eaver"? Jesus Christ....

 

[speakeasy]

$3.7 million would currently be worth $92.5 billion million dollars in Zimbabwe, but people have the liberty to spend money how they choose.

Many of the über-wealthy already donate mathematically significant funds to charities. Must every million dollars be spent virtuously?

The type of person that would spend $3.7 million to bang this girl probably isn't the type that cares much about philanthropy or the human condition around the world. Just sayin'.

Why aren't you donating $25 a month to sponsor a starving African kid? Is anyone judgemental for you not to be donating money?

How do you know I'm not?

 

[KidwithSocks]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do3otUSbTpA SHE HAS NO FWENDSS

 

[bigjohnson]

I bet what she's really doing is a feminist school paper. After collecting all of these offers she's gonna make it into her thesis that men are desparate ....

Pretty solid odds I'd say.

I see what you're saying, but if you spent 0.04% of your net worth *, as would be if you were the 100th richest man in the world, would it be that much of a waste of money?

Yes. Even if I have 10 billion dollars I still expect to pay near market for commodities, or I'm being ripped off. If I were worth $10,000,000,000 I can't imagine giving her a second glance, anyone in that situation can be swimming in better looking tail than her without even trying and without the publicity.

just becuase michael dell could spend 20 million dollar for a butterfinger, does not mean it's wise or smart thing to do.

Exactly.

If someone offered this to you for $.25 would you say no? That's what it would be like to a super-wealthy individual. As Dish said, it's all relative.

No it's not. Sorry. No matter how rich I am, I'm not gonna pay 10,000 times the going rate for an inferior gallon of gasoline to put in my exotic car. This is a semi-ugly girl with a shit attitude whoring herself out for way over her market value.

The only thing that would tip it NOW is maybe the competition due to her notoriety but then our hypothetical billionaire is no longer just buying tail.


Her sister is pretty hot in my estimation, I'm not surprised she could make big dollars as an escort.

 

[STR8UP]

That's ridiculous. As if there's no love, or children or sacrifice or anything else that goes into a marriage. Or that the woman doesn't want sex as well. Hell these days it takes 2 good incomes to make it and many wives are financially contributing just as much as the man. Reducing marriage down to being no different than prostitution is just silly. There are many serious, committed people who end up married until death do them part and the husband can no longer get it up. We don't live in the leave it to ****** era anymore where the woman needs the guy's money and the guy needs the trophy wife to bang when he gets home from work. Might be true for a couple really wealthy guys, but these days, everyone has to work and contribute, male or female. And women like to fvck just as much as men do, only difference is they rather do it with someone they are in love with.

ps - WTF? B eaver got censored out? As in "Leave it to B eaver"? Jesus Christ....

Why do you think prostitutes are 99% women?

Think about that for a minute.

Sex is a commodity. A woman trades sex for a lot of things. Does she enjoy it as well? Sure, but to her it's as much of a a tool to get through life as it is to make babies. Women figured this out LOOOOONG ago.

Sex is essentially a woman's primary "resource". I will say it again.....in one way or another all women barter with sex.

I read a post on another forum where the poster said that a woman who feels she has been the victim of a "womanizer" is a woman who felt she didn't get what she deserved from the "transaction". And that's EXACTLY what it boils down to. She felt like she got ripped off!

That's how it is. If a woman gives up the poon, the majority of the time there is an implication of some kind of reciprocation. Some women have sex for sport, certainly MOST of them have done it or will do it at some point in their lives, but that is the exception and not the rule.

Sorry to burst you bubble, but essentially marriage IS an exchange of resources. You can believe in true love and pixies and unicorns all you want, but at the end of the day it serves a functional purpose. All of that syrupy crap is just the thin shell that disguises the machinery.

 

[STR8UP]

No it's not. Sorry. No matter how rich I am, I'm not gonna pay 10,000 times the going rate for an inferior gallon of gasoline to put in my exotic car. This is a semi-ugly girl with a shit attitude whoring herself out for way over her market value.

You could say the same about someone over bidding for a painting. If you want THAT particular painting and money is no object, it makes no difference....you will outbid the shill just to have it hanging above your mantle.

There are too many variables here. The butterfinger example doesn't hold water in this case, I'm afraid.

 

[bigjohnson]

Sex is essentially a woman's primary "resource". I will say it again.....in one way or another all women barter with sex.

This is one reason I love non-western and particularly Asian culture women. They are careful with their virginity, try to be chaste and modest, AND at the same understand and accept, even embrace, the fact that the man they end up with is gonna be there to a large degree for the sex.

They don't feel 'bad' about it, they feel great to be desired and work hard to stay desirable. Nice.

You could say the same about someone over bidding for a painting. If you want THAT particular painting and money is no object, it makes no difference....you will outbid the shill just to have it hanging above your mantle.

There are too many variables here. The butterfinger example doesn't hold water in this case, I'm afraid.

The painting isn't a good example either really if the argument is that "it's not much money so a rich person will do it". As you note the world is full of whores and sex really is a commodity. So what drives this cost up? It's not the sex, or the fact that the fuel I'm buying for my Ferrari is special. It's that cameras are rolling as a micro-kini clad Paris Hilton operates the pump.

All I'm saying is that sure a wealthy person might bid on this (apparently someone did) but it's not because the cost is negligible to them and therefore it's worth paying $3.7 million for sex. For them. Nope.

At this level it's no longer about getting some tail it's about a lot more. It's buying celebrity or more accurately maybe, notoriety among other things.

 

[(JJ)]

imagine if we could do this.

if the whole world were flipped.

if a guy was saying that a girl could be the first one to fvck him for 3 mil.

they'd get laughed right off the internet.

hahaha. crazy world. something i don't really understand about psychology is why men havent just started doing the same thing as women... hoarding sex. it seems like its kinda unnecessary and we're always complaining about how we dont get it enough. i havent really researched it or anything but it is interesting.

 

[Levex]

1. This chick got fairly nice boobs, but is on the chunky side.

2. She would be awful in bed and probably just lie there. You might as well fvck a folded pillow and save the money.

3. This gave me inspiration. Look for me on ebay selling my anal virginity for a couple mil.:moon:

 

[Majestick]

LOL.

No woman is worth that. She has average looks, probably has little sexual experience, and by definition is a ***** for selling herself for sex.

That ***** FTL.

I'd love to be the fly on the wall when she tells her husband, someday in the future, of this story! :crackup:

 

[ketostix]

This is one reason I love non-western and particularly Asian culture women. They are careful with their virginity, try to be chaste and modest, AND at the same understand and accept, even embrace, the fact that the man they end up with is gonna be there to a large degree for the sex.

They don't feel 'bad' about it, they feel great to be desired and work hard to stay desirable. Nice.

There was a time not so long ago in western culture too that a female just about had to be a virgin to have enough value for a man to want to marry her. Then, an unmarried woman was either a wh0re or a virgin. There was no inbetween. Men in their late 20's and 30's commonly married females who were 13 or 14 years of age and virgins. How times have changed, but it's mostly societal and feminism.

The painting isn't a good example either really if the argument is that "it's not much money so a rich person will do it". As you note the world is full of whores and sex really is a commodity. So what drives this cost up? It's not the sex, or the fact that the fuel I'm buying for my Ferrari is special. It's that cameras are rolling as a micro-kini clad Paris Hilton operates the pump.

All I'm saying is that sure a wealthy person might bid on this (apparently someone did) but it's not because the cost is negligible to them and therefore it's worth paying $3.7 million for sex. For them. Nope.

At this level it's no longer about getting some tail it's about a lot more. It's buying celebrity or more accurately maybe, notoriety among other things.

I agree with you. Most wealthy people don't pay more than market value for something. In this case, I agree it's all about celebrity or fame. And therein lies the value.

 

[Akuma]

I agree with you. Most wealthy people don't pay more than market value for something. In this case, I agree it's all about celebrity or fame. And therein lies the value.

Wealthy people can recognize a bad investment when they see one, and I don't see much value to this investment. Would you like to be known as the man who wasted 3.7 million to bang a chubby chick? Hell, I probably wouldn't even tell my friends if I did it for free.

 

[Majestick]

Actually, on second thought, maybe I should auction off myself. I could use a few million dollars

 

[ketostix]

Wealthy people can recognize a bad investment when they see one, and I don't see much value to this investment. Would you like to be known as the man who wasted 3.7 million to bang a chubby chick? Hell, I probably wouldn't even tell my friends if I did it for free.

Well the point is whether you personally put any celebrity value on this, many other people do. I don't personally think it's worth it, but what I'm saying is this thing has exclusivity and celebrity/notoriety value. That's where most of the value is being derived from. This particular girl, her virginity, and the relative cost to a rich person are all just side issues.

 

[j0n024]

I like this little tidbit...

"I believe that if most of us were self-sufficient, and had the means to pay our own way (meaning had the ability to pay rent, bills, supply ourselves with food, and purchase clothing and accessories), with the measly paychecks that we earn, that we wouldnʼt even consider getting married until we found the right person to be with."

Apparently only weirdos are self-sufficient and this is from .a WOMEN that women dont marry for love anymore.

I just saw the tyra show on youtube was skipping around and noticed close to the end she contradicted herself... she said that it wasnt about money and it was about connection but hen she said it was MAINLY about the money.

What a joke...

 

[Matt Rogers]

A few points:

1. We are not talking 3 million. It is an auction. The total sum of the bids may total 3 million but as far as I read it the leading bid at the moment is only a couple hundred thousand.

2. If you are a typical AFC rich guy the chances are growing up you sucked with women so it is unlikely you had the chance to sleep with a virgin. By the time these guys were rich there weren't any virgins left in their age range and the younger women who are willing to sleep with older guys it is usually because they are bored of sleeping with penniless guys there own age. I mean in this day and age what percentage of girls over 20 are virgins? Very few and the ones that are invariably are ugly as sin or religious fanatics. So I bet the average AFC rich guy has never slept with a virgin and will never get the chance to. Hence the high interest in this girl even though she is average looking.

3.

 

[MisterSinister]

There's a site saying it has gone up to 7 million.

 

[Ganondorf]

Why do you think prostitutes are 99% women?

Think about that for a minute.

Sex is a commodity. A woman trades sex for a lot of things. Does she enjoy it as well? Sure, but to her it's as much of a a tool to get through life as it is to make babies. Women figured this out LOOOOONG ago.

Sex is essentially a woman's primary "resource". I will say it again.....in one way or another all women barter with sex.

I read a post on another forum where the poster said that a woman who feels she has been the victim of a "womanizer" is a woman who felt she didn't get what she deserved from the "transaction". And that's EXACTLY what it boils down to. She felt like she got ripped off!

That's how it is. If a woman gives up the poon, the majority of the time there is an implication of some kind of reciprocation. Some women have sex for sport, certainly MOST of them have done it or will do it at some point in their lives, but that is the exception and not the rule.

Sorry to burst you bubble, but essentially marriage IS an exchange of resources. You can believe in true love and pixies and unicorns all you want, but at the end of the day it serves a functional purpose. All of that syrupy crap is just the thin shell that disguises the machinery.

You guys are too focused on the sexual aspect of things.

Sure men love sex, but to want to be with a woman, it's not about the sex, it's about the connection

People choose to remain with a person out of a number of reasons, but most relationships are based on more than just glorified prostitution. WOmen are people as well, and thus desire sex as much as men do

you logic seems to paint men as having to pay for sex. I'm afraid that's not true at all

Think about it? when have you ever heard this?

Man:" Hey susan, lets say i marry you. I'm giving you this big wedding, but i want the sex in return, understand?"

Sue: "OK, it better be good too"

there's no denying that women do use sex at times to control men, but that is just a form of manipulation. It really has not much to do with the whole "Sexual" picture in general
It's no different than a player using head games to control women