MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 11,296
- Reaction score
- 4,664
The recent announcement of Indiana governor Mitch Daniels in not running for POTUS has got me thinking. His personal life story is that he had been divorced from his wife, but they reconciled and remarried. I remember thinking that any man that would take back his divorced wife must have been the rejected one in that divorce, and that that situation must have been that she had determined that at that earlier time, that her sexual market value was higher than him, but that a later time as her sexual market value declined much more relative to him (especially as his political career had advanced), she had decided that his value was good enough to get together - with the added shaming argument that it should be done for the children's sake (that obviously wasn't problem when the children were even younger when SHE left. (The other possible reason could have been that she was just loony/shrewish, and that he just didn't feel like taking it anymore - but a man would not want to take back such a woman, so I figure it wasn't that.)
Anyway, here's an article from a mainline political rag that brings up this same point.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/88654/mitch-daniels-and-the-cuckold-factor
Here's another interesting tidbit:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=299113
Anyway, here's an article from a mainline political rag that brings up this same point.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/88654/mitch-daniels-and-the-cuckold-factor
Here's another interesting tidbit:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=299113
... the hard fact is that Americans tend to prefer leaders who are alpha adulterers like Kennedy and Clinton to beta cuckolds