*** Myth # 1: Meeting women online isn't the real world
Response: It BECOMES the real world once you meet them in person
*** Myth # 2: It becomes a crutch for people
Response: Well in that case so are clubs or any specific venue where you operate within only one channel, and within certain times of day
*** Myth # 3: All the girls you meet have some sort of problem
Response: This may be more true in smaller towns, but in bigger cities where internet dating is more mainstream, this is certainly not the case. The average chick you meet online is representative of the average chick outside
*** Myth # 4: You lose communication skills
Response: You challenge your communication skills. In fact in some ways it is even harder to pull from online since all you have is the power of text. How do you think I learned NLP and flirting? Hundreds of MSN chats leading to hundreds of phone calls, leading to dozens of meets. It all helps.
*** Myth # 5: It's a numbers game.
Response: It's always a numbers game. The main difference is that women are less likely to remember you if you "****ed up" online. But once you get the skills you can "sarge" her again with a different picture and a different profile and go from there.
*** Myth # 6: It just doesn't work, period. You're wasting your time.
Response: You suck at it, period. There's an even bigger matrix for internet sarging than in-person sarging. As evident by the fact that even certain "gurus" renounce it's effectiveness.
*** Myth # 7: Hot women on the internet are validation queens who don't want to meet.
Response: Hot women EVERYWHERE are validation queens. Whether they are sitting in front of a computer or out at the club - they are always in the princess mindset.
*** Myth # 8: It limits your choices.
Response: I can technically sarge more than one woman at a time with multiple chat windows, and home in on the one that is most receptive and get her on the phone, and return to the others later.
*** Myth # 9: You don't know what you're doing wrong unlike in real life where you get actual feedback.
Response: Partially true. BUT by getting girls on my MSN I can better observe certain behavior patterns which I would NOT normally be able to notice as clearly. This reinforces the understanding I have of certain behavior patterns which I "suspected" were true from my own in-person experiences but never had direct non-anecdotal evidence to prove.
Example 1 - If a girl is digging me she will ALWAYS initiate messaging me. Once I get them on MSN I can roughly gauge her interest over time like a meter, based on how and when she uses the Away, Busy, or Online status.
If she likes me and really wants to talk to me she will change her Away or Busy status to Online, when I log in. Conversely, if she doesn't like me she will switch to Away or Busy status when I log in. Much easier than calling and re-calling the girl whom you can't quite tell if she is just not interested or just has a lot on the go. Getting a girl on your MSN from an in-person sarge is also good for this same reason.
Unlike the phone where even girls who like you won't always initiate calling you, by getting them on your messenger you take away that source of "stage fright", and make them more likely to chase you a bit. Which means that IF they like you they will message you, ALWAYS, even the shy girls.
And this will indeed happen if you ran good game the first time you chatted and HOOKED them. Setting up a meet is EASY then.
Example 2 - I can more easily, based on behavior patterns, figure out which chicks are seeking pure validation from me as opposed to actually being interested. I've had a few chicks message me out of the blue who sorta hinted at meeting up, and so I took the bait and went for it. But then they declined as they were "too busy". I then looked at the Allow List on my MSN (which tells me which chicks still have me on their contact list), and I found that these same chicks deleted me soon after. I gave them the validation they sought and their mission was accomplished.
Another way to tell if chicks aren't interested, but would still like your validation, is if they don't reply to your MSN messages, and if you check your Allow list you see that they deleted you from their contact list. But they haven't blocked YOU, so you can still see them online (and hence message them if you want). This adds evidence to the claim that girls want you to like them even if they don't like you, meaning they will open the door for you to chase them even if they have no interest in you.
*** Myth # 10: It's too time consuming.
Response: It's less time consuming because all I have to do is be in the right mental state, as opposed to being in the right mental state, dressed up, cleaned up, and in the right venue. I can do this from work, or while in my pajamas. And I sometimes keep my cell phone near my computer so I can get the chicks on the phone if need be.
*** Myth # 11: It creates excuses.
Response: Excuses become less plausible. There are no ****blocks, or other obstacles to complain about. You can't even say there are lack of targets since searches turn up THOUSANDS of prospects.
Once you get her attention, can you keep it, and can you get her to meet you? Remember, she might have some internet stigma associated with meeting you as well, not always easy to overcome either. Internet sarging is a great way to isolate your attraction game from confounding obstacles like logistics and ****blocks. So when you **** up it's all you...there's nothing else in the universe to blame.
*** Myth # 12: It takes less skill then real life.
Response: In some ways it takes more skill because, as I said, all you have is the power of text to work with, which is why real life game is more accessible to more people INITIALLY, simply because it's easier. Once you get some real life skill then give online a shot, and if you're like me, and you're out of town a lot, then internet sarging will make your game WAY more efficient (less costly too, as clubs, booze, and cab fare are fairly $$$. Also, there's the matter of health. I want to preserve my hearing well into the future..)
Response: It BECOMES the real world once you meet them in person
*** Myth # 2: It becomes a crutch for people
Response: Well in that case so are clubs or any specific venue where you operate within only one channel, and within certain times of day
*** Myth # 3: All the girls you meet have some sort of problem
Response: This may be more true in smaller towns, but in bigger cities where internet dating is more mainstream, this is certainly not the case. The average chick you meet online is representative of the average chick outside
*** Myth # 4: You lose communication skills
Response: You challenge your communication skills. In fact in some ways it is even harder to pull from online since all you have is the power of text. How do you think I learned NLP and flirting? Hundreds of MSN chats leading to hundreds of phone calls, leading to dozens of meets. It all helps.
*** Myth # 5: It's a numbers game.
Response: It's always a numbers game. The main difference is that women are less likely to remember you if you "****ed up" online. But once you get the skills you can "sarge" her again with a different picture and a different profile and go from there.
*** Myth # 6: It just doesn't work, period. You're wasting your time.
Response: You suck at it, period. There's an even bigger matrix for internet sarging than in-person sarging. As evident by the fact that even certain "gurus" renounce it's effectiveness.
*** Myth # 7: Hot women on the internet are validation queens who don't want to meet.
Response: Hot women EVERYWHERE are validation queens. Whether they are sitting in front of a computer or out at the club - they are always in the princess mindset.
*** Myth # 8: It limits your choices.
Response: I can technically sarge more than one woman at a time with multiple chat windows, and home in on the one that is most receptive and get her on the phone, and return to the others later.
*** Myth # 9: You don't know what you're doing wrong unlike in real life where you get actual feedback.
Response: Partially true. BUT by getting girls on my MSN I can better observe certain behavior patterns which I would NOT normally be able to notice as clearly. This reinforces the understanding I have of certain behavior patterns which I "suspected" were true from my own in-person experiences but never had direct non-anecdotal evidence to prove.
Example 1 - If a girl is digging me she will ALWAYS initiate messaging me. Once I get them on MSN I can roughly gauge her interest over time like a meter, based on how and when she uses the Away, Busy, or Online status.
If she likes me and really wants to talk to me she will change her Away or Busy status to Online, when I log in. Conversely, if she doesn't like me she will switch to Away or Busy status when I log in. Much easier than calling and re-calling the girl whom you can't quite tell if she is just not interested or just has a lot on the go. Getting a girl on your MSN from an in-person sarge is also good for this same reason.
Unlike the phone where even girls who like you won't always initiate calling you, by getting them on your messenger you take away that source of "stage fright", and make them more likely to chase you a bit. Which means that IF they like you they will message you, ALWAYS, even the shy girls.
And this will indeed happen if you ran good game the first time you chatted and HOOKED them. Setting up a meet is EASY then.
Example 2 - I can more easily, based on behavior patterns, figure out which chicks are seeking pure validation from me as opposed to actually being interested. I've had a few chicks message me out of the blue who sorta hinted at meeting up, and so I took the bait and went for it. But then they declined as they were "too busy". I then looked at the Allow List on my MSN (which tells me which chicks still have me on their contact list), and I found that these same chicks deleted me soon after. I gave them the validation they sought and their mission was accomplished.
Another way to tell if chicks aren't interested, but would still like your validation, is if they don't reply to your MSN messages, and if you check your Allow list you see that they deleted you from their contact list. But they haven't blocked YOU, so you can still see them online (and hence message them if you want). This adds evidence to the claim that girls want you to like them even if they don't like you, meaning they will open the door for you to chase them even if they have no interest in you.
*** Myth # 10: It's too time consuming.
Response: It's less time consuming because all I have to do is be in the right mental state, as opposed to being in the right mental state, dressed up, cleaned up, and in the right venue. I can do this from work, or while in my pajamas. And I sometimes keep my cell phone near my computer so I can get the chicks on the phone if need be.
*** Myth # 11: It creates excuses.
Response: Excuses become less plausible. There are no ****blocks, or other obstacles to complain about. You can't even say there are lack of targets since searches turn up THOUSANDS of prospects.
Once you get her attention, can you keep it, and can you get her to meet you? Remember, she might have some internet stigma associated with meeting you as well, not always easy to overcome either. Internet sarging is a great way to isolate your attraction game from confounding obstacles like logistics and ****blocks. So when you **** up it's all you...there's nothing else in the universe to blame.
*** Myth # 12: It takes less skill then real life.
Response: In some ways it takes more skill because, as I said, all you have is the power of text to work with, which is why real life game is more accessible to more people INITIALLY, simply because it's easier. Once you get some real life skill then give online a shot, and if you're like me, and you're out of town a lot, then internet sarging will make your game WAY more efficient (less costly too, as clubs, booze, and cab fare are fairly $$$. Also, there's the matter of health. I want to preserve my hearing well into the future..)
