FWIW the presence of explosive material has been confirmed in the debris. A Danish scientist published
a paper that was peer-reviewed by the scientific community for over a year before it went public.
The consensus is that
NANO-THERMITE was indeed found from several samples of debris. This should not be confused with plain thermite, which debunkers point out could be mistaken for rust. It is a sophisticated type of explosive that can only be engineered in a lab. Here is the lead scientist on Danish television talking about it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
Countless eyewitnesses/survivors reported various explosions, both directly before impact and before the collapse. In fact you can
hear the explosions for yourself (@ 4:30)
WTC Building 7 is by far the biggest smoking gun. Bombs were found in that building by police and firemen,
listen to them warn people that the building is gonna explode:
The entire street in front of building 7
was NUKED before it even fell. Please somebody explain to me how jet fuel from a block away could do this.
The only witness to the explosions in this building died mysteriously after appearing in several films to
tell his story:
Why have I done so much research on this? My dad used to rent a flat on Warren Street and we watched the first tower fall. Right before that happened, there was a MASSIVE explosion which shook our building. I will never forget it.
Plus I just don't get how anyone can buy the official story when its obvious those towers exploded to dust in mid air before hitting the ground. Over a thousand
architects and engineers also know a controlled demolition when they see one.
Drdeee said:
don't they have respect to 9/11 victims and families?
This is a common argument and at face value it seems to make sense, until you realize that the most vocal people in the 911 truth movement ARE the families of the victims. These are people who have done their own in-depth research and are not satisfied with the official story.
They have every right to be upset too. It's pretty fuct up when you realize that
80 million dollars were spent investigating Bill Clinton's affair with Ms. Lewinsky, and only 10 million were granted for the official 911 investigation. Talk about screwed up priorities.
Al Qaeda couldn't have wired the buildings like that
Well at least we agree on something
it would have taken months of preparation and government level clearances to carry something of that magnitude out.
Precisely.
FWIW, with nanothermite you don't need as much preparation; since you can literally paint it right on the beams the setup is minimal. You also don't need massive quantities of the stuff; it was designed for quickly taking down enemy buildings in a war situation. Just paint away then set up bombs in strategic places and the chain reaction takes care of itself.
As for government clearance, it should raise more than a few eyebrows to know that Marvin Bush (George's little bro) was in charge of security at WTC, and there were several unprecedented power-downs in the weeks leading to the attack. All surveillance was turned off and employees report seeing a LOT of unfamiliar faces of maintenance workers going in and out.
For 9 months leading up to 911, renovations were done on the elevator shafts. Couple this with the fact that a routine sweep by bomb-sniffing dogs was called off 5 days before 911 and you realize how much this whole thing stinks.
And I highly doubt our government would do something like this to their own people, after all they too got hit on 9/11, pentagon had a nice round hole in it and **** chenney was helping put out the fire!
The very day before this happened, Rumsfield came out to the press and said that there was a serious case of fraud in the military -
2.3 trillion dollars went "missing"
Guess where all of the paperwork/evidence for this case was sitting. Yup, precisely in the spot that got hit by the plane. Pretty convenient if you ask me.
Now if you want to really connect all the dots as to who did this and why, peep this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW23PuBKiA0
Disclaimer: I can't vouch for
everything he says, but the good chunk of it I did check turned out to be legit. Don't take my word for it though. I encourage you to dig around and reach your own conclusions.
If you want to debunk any of this I welcome it. But please use links to your sources and provide valid, scientific arguments instead of your own layman conclusions of what you think happened.
Whether you think 911 was an inside job, there is no denying that the official story leaves much to be desired, and the families of the victims deserve better.
