In A Traditional Marriage, A Woman Don’t Need No Money

[Vincent]

Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
Vincent

"Uh no, they can be used in replace of he or she to help with the flow of the paper. But I'm not trying to be a grammar nazi here."

If this topic and the way it is presented bothers you, why not start a topic on grammer?That way you can make use of the skills you have instead of faking it on this topic.

You are obviously new to these forums. This is anything else. I don't have to be serious anywhere in here.

I did not say anything about your topic mostly because it was too long and I didn't feel like reading it. Hell I didn't even vote in your poll.

This forum is laid back, but apparently I stuck a nerve when I commented on your double negative in your post title. If I was a true grammar nazi I would be complaining about people not capitalizing their I's and people saying u instead of you, or there instead of their.

Me commenting on your double negative was just me making a point. You never had to respond to what I said, so technically, you "faked" up your thread when you decided to complain about it.

 

[Brother_Rapp]

Wyldfire


"In my experience, the type of man who has this kind of view are control freaks. I say this because I was married to one. Notice how I said "was"? It was a HORRIBLE experience and to be perfectly honest with you, if I had to choose between having to live like that again and death I would choose death. There are aspects of being "traditional" that I agree with, but having one person not have any money is absolutely ridiculous. A woman should not have to ask for money when she needs tampons, wants to buy gifts, or be stuck stranded on the side of the road with a broken down car without money for a tow truck or cab...etc."

OH MY GOODNESS!!!
I wasn't saying that at all. She just don't need no two, three hundred dollars in her pocket. The guy should determine the direction of the main money. I even said earlier that she should have cigarette money, and gas money and enough money to do as he might want her to do something. No man should want to be nickled and dimed to death. Who would want to be bothered every minute for something. I would hope that he would have enough sense to be sure she had spending money for incidentals.

 

[Brother_Rapp]

Vincent

" You are obviously new to these forums. This is anything else. I don't have to be serious anywhere in here.

I did not say anything about your topic mostly because it was too long and I didn't feel like reading it. Hell I didn't even vote in your poll.

This forum is laid back, but apparently I stuck a nerve when I commented on your double negative in your post title. If I was a true grammar nazi I would be complaining about people not capitalizing their I's and people saying u instead of you, or there instead of their.

Me commenting on your double negative was just me making a point. You never had to respond to what I said, so technically, you "faked" up your thread when you decided to complain about it."




Whateeeeeever

 

[Vincent]

Originally posted by Brother_Rapp

Whateeeeeever

lol, very appropriate

 

[dietzcoi]

This is just great.

Don't you fools know that if the wife has not job she will take the husband to the cleaners in the divorce?

If you prevent your wife from working the judge will hammer you into the ground.

Better think about it as the divorce rate is 50%.

This is so foolish nowadays. You are willing to let some ho sit on her a$$ and spend your money. I just cannot understand it. Do you think a woman is your possession? Silly, silly men...

Listen to me, I went thru it as an AFC and now know that it is very AFC and insecure to keep your woman home and chained to the stove.

Sorry if I do not have the power of writing skills to convince you people....

Dietzcoi

 

[Brother_Rapp]

dietzcoi


“Don't you fools know that if the wife has no job she will take the husband to the cleaners in the divorce?”

I’m glad you brought that point up. Divorce has and can happy to any marriage. If she is supportive of the guy’s direction for the family, doing her best to relieve his anxieties, and taking care of the house and kids, then he better act right. If she looses her trust in him by way of how the money is handle and / infidelity on his part she’s supposed to divorce him.


“Listen to me, I went thru it as an AFC and now know that it is very AFC and insecure to keep your woman home and chained to the stove.”

The guy is chained to his job. Both have responsibilities. What’s wrong with that?

 

[Brother_Rapp]

"Passivity is the natural female principle. The marriage of active (male) and passive (female) is the basis of heterosexuality."


In Praise of Traditional Women
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
January 25, 2004

 

[LordBrian]

Re: hmmm...

Originally posted by ~ªêQµïTª$~
In my opinion, a woman must also work in a relationship and also make money... I will never marry a girl that doesnt have some form of income... She cannot rely on ME to give her all the money etc... She dont have a job/income, then out the door she goes, simple.


Laterz...

I gotta agree with this. The more money she is making... the less hard I have to work. And if we both work hard, then we can start buying some luxury items.

 

[Brother_Rapp]

There is a growing percentage of marriages that are without sex due to men not wanting to have it with their wives. The reason? Feminist mind control... A woman thrives best in the context of a loving marriage. Most women want to belong to one man, their husband. Men need to assert their rightful role as leaders and dump the women who don't like it. I say that we men should stand our ground. There are some women that can be saved. Those that cain’t? Fyck ‘em. There are plenty of other gals out there.

A woman’s traditional part is to give the guy the power of control. A man will not care about something that doesn't belong to him. He should find a woman who is prepared to surrender power in exchange for love. Marriage is about union, two people becoming one. For women, surrender of power (her independence ergo money) is the essence of love. If a woman can't trust a man with her money and / or whole life, she doesn't love him and shouldn't marry him.

When a woman constantly nags her husband, she is emasculating him. If she really wants to have good sex with her husband, she should shut the **** up. How can he screw her when she’s cut off his balls? If feminism is allowed to cut the balls of the guys, then society as a whole becomes homosexual (defined here as the inability to form a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex). Feminism destroys the traditional structure of the family. It creates fatherless kids, which lead to increase crime, which sabotages our society. Then the guy goes out and tries to make it up in other ways. Buying a big car and screwing another woman are but two of the ways available to him for that purpose.

Men traditionally respond to the weakness of women not to power. They want to be needed in that respect. An independent minded woman doesn’t need protection. Hence, he doesn’t want to screw her. Men want power. Women want love. The female surrenders and allows the male to protect and possess her. By encouraging young women to be "strong and independent", feminism has given them a mental dyck. Men become a needless duplication of what these liberated bytches do. Why then do they need men? A man cannot love a woman if he doesn't have the power to grant her wishes. When the husband has the power, he can and does his best within reason to make his wife happy. The power is thus used for the benefit of the two of them.

These days, there are a number of women ashamed to admit that they want and / or like to be homemakers. Feminist has brainwash them into thinking that it’s a crime to be good to your husband. Being a wife and mother is what makes a woman tick. A wife responds to her husband's needs and a mother responds to her child's. That proves they love us. How is it that taking somebody’s shyt in the work place is better then staying at home and taking care of her loved ones? Obeying her boss is better then obeying her guy?? Her guy is the one that’s loves her. He’s the guy that has promise to love, protect and cherish her till death do they part. The idea that a married woman needs her independence is sheer stupidity. A woman needs a man to love her. A woman is not going to be loved permanently just for her appearance. Love is not like that. We love the people who sacrifice themselves for us. Love is self-sacrifice. Independence is living for you. Ain’t no love there. Men must also keep their end of the contract, or the marriage is off. They have to also sacrifice by working to support their families and providing love and direction. They must be loyal, and show every day how much they appreciate their wife.

 

[Giovanni Casanova]

You just don't get any smarter, do you?

 

[Brother_Rapp]

Giovanni Casanova

I think that everybody can learn stuff, if they are willing to have an open mind. You'd be surprised at what I've learned from your comments. They teach me what not to be like. Please make some more remarks without substance. All you've done is try to slam my intelligence. I have yet to read something from you on the subject. It's always about me. When I ask you to comment on the subject, you try to blow it off and come back with something like it's too far out to make sense so you would somehow be stooping low to comment on it. If you have something to add to a debate, that's cool. I welcome it.But to sit make and throw out your litttle funny remarks ain't about nothing. You can not kill the message by killing the messenger. If you don't like the message then go after it. If you would look at the polling and the postings, you would see that there are others here that think somewhat as I. But do you attack their character? No. Why is that? Am I somehow special to you? What's up man?

 

[Giovanni Casanova]

Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
If you have something to add to a debate, that's cool.

Debate? There IS no debate. What you're doing is the equivalent of me going on some girl's website and saying, "I hate men, they are all pigs!" and then waiting for all the pats on the back.

How do you debate that? You're saying nothing of substance either, you're just taking a lot longer to do it.

And you're an idiot.

 

[Ricky]

I used to be a traditionalist. That is until i saw what happened to my brother.

His wife who has a college degree didn't work more than about a month of the first 10 years of their marriage.

During those 10 years they didn't have kids, she slept in, remained fat (and didn't workout), but some how she could still order him around and if I asked my brother to go out and do something he said he had to "talk to the boss".

My brother does have a nice house, but could never go on vacations or afford them.

She could be nice sometimes, but other times had the nerve to try to tease me about things or even make fun of my cooking (did i mention she doesn't cook at all either?)

Now they have a child. She has her legitimate excuse finally to stay at home.

She cashed in on him. My brother was her early retirement husbad.

 

[SheDevil]

"I think that everybody can learn stuff, if they are willing to have an open mind." -- Brother_Rapp

B_R: You making the above referenced statement has GOT TO BE the most ironic quote of the century! PLEASE listen to yourself and learn. Where is your open mind?

Your age states you are 58, yet your profile shows a DOB of '69? How old are you?

Are you married and actively living in this state of bliss of which you preach? If not, Why? What happened?

What you speak of may be perfect for you. Maybe you need a woman that cooks, cleans, and greets you at the door with your 1.75 children and dog, playing inside the white picket fence of your mid 100k house. If this is your desire, your comfort, go for it, it is perfect for you.

Maybe you want to "possess" a woman that has no opinion, no input to the marriage, no drives and no desires. Maybe you want a woman whose only goal in life is to sit quietly awaiting your becken call and jumping to meet your need.


OR =>


OR =>

JUST MAYBE this is all you can handle. O_O

After reading this and your other rant I think you are asking for help.

I think a woman that has opinions and contributions and desires, scares you witless!

I think you are too proud to admit it and too proud to ask, but I think you have come here to try to learn a way to be with a more complex woman.

You are really coming in the backdoor on this, but, hey, I am glad you are here.

I feel your skills with women are very limited, this is fully based on the 'stuff' you are preaching. You want more in a woman, dont you?

There is the DJ bible to read and many men here that can offer help, listen to them and learn.

I did, and every time I curl up with my lover I am so thankful for each of them.

If this is the knowledge you seek, just ask already! I have read (skimmed over) much of this continual rant and have only learned that you really have no clue as to a constructive relationship.

I really do wish you good luck.

 

[Luveno]

Only way I'm getting married is if the wife is making more money than I am(and that will be very unlikely).

 

[Brother_Rapp]

SheDevil

"Your age states you are 58, yet your profile shows a DOB of '69? How old are you"


I clicked on my profile off a post of mine asnd I saw that dec. stuff, but when I went in from the user button at the upper right I saw that it was written correctly. May 13,
1947

Next month it's on a Friday. How about that?

Perhaps the cmoderator will straighten it out for me.

Giovanni Casanova

How about it?

 

[Brother_Rapp]

Giovanni Casanova

“Debate? There IS no debate. What you're doing is the equivalent of me going on some girl's website and saying, "I hate men, they are all pigs!" and then waiting for all the pats on the back.

How do you debate that? You're saying nothing of substance either, you're just taking a lot longer to do it.

And you're an idiot.”

Nowhere have I said that I hate women. Let’s see you point out the post where I said that I hate women. If you can’t then I expect you to step up like a man and apologize. You stuck your foot into it this time. Point out the post or apologize. Four of the prettiest things my eyes have ever seen is money, women, babies and the skies of Texas. This whole conversation is going over your head isn’t it? There you go with the judgmental attitude as well. What is it with you and name-calling?

 

[Brother_Rapp]

Ricky

I used to be a traditionalist. That is until i saw what happened to my brother.

”His wife who has a college degree didn't work more than about a month of the first 10 years of their marriage.”
But they where together for ten years. How many marriages fail way before that?


”During those 10 years they didn't have kids, she slept in, remained fat (and didn't workout), but some how she could still order him around and if I asked my brother to go out and do something he said he had to "talk to the boss".”

Fat, skinny, whatever.. did your brother cheat on her?


“My brother does have a nice house, but could never go on vacations or afford them.”


You damn right. He gave her whatever he could. What’s wrong with that? The guy was happy and you sound like you’re jealous. He was and still is your brother. But since he got married, it’s her husband then your brother as the order of things. After the kid, it became his wife, then his kid, then came you in the order of importance. Get over it.

“She could be nice sometimes, but other times had the nerve to try to tease me about things or even make fun of my cooking"

So what? You ain’t her husband. She was focused. She don’t have to please you. It’s her husband that she has to and apparently does. Have they gotten a divorce?

“(did i mention she doesn't cook at all either?)”

Do you think that it’s possible that she could be doing something in bed that is none of your business, which is pleasing your brother. I’d be willing to bet that she has been a very good wife to him. My hat’s off to their relationship.


"Now they have a child. She has her legitimate excuse finally to stay at home.

She cashed in on him. My brother was her early retirement husbad."

So what? That ain’t your business. They are together. That’s what counts for them.

 

[Brother_Rapp]

SheDevil


“B_R: You making the above referenced statement has GOT TO BE the most ironic quote of the century! PLEASE listen to yourself and learn. Where is your open mind?”

Because somebody may not agree with you, you say that their mind is closed? Have you found any thing in any of my posts that you agree with in even the slightest way?

“I think you are too proud to admit it and too proud to ask, but I think you have come here to try to learn a way to be with a more complex woman.”

I like for my beliefs to be challenged. A person should always try to say what he or she believes and be ready to defend their beliefs.

“I feel your skills with women are very limited, this is fully based on the 'stuff' you are preaching. You want more in a woman, dont you?”

What I want is my wife back. We were married 12 years and she passed away in ’96. She was truly a wonderful woman. I want my wife back

 

[Giovanni Casanova]

Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
Nowhere have I said that I hate women. Let’s see you point out the post where I said that I hate women. If you can’t then I expect you to step up like a man and apologize. You stuck your foot into it this time. Point out the post or apologize.

Retard, nowhere have I said that you said you hate women. Let's see you point out the post where I said that. I expect YOU to apologize to ME. Of course, you can go ahead and expect into one hand and sh!t into the other and see which one fills up fastest.

In the meantime, I should have known that analogies would be wasted on you, because morons don't understand them. The point was that you would come onto a men's website and say that women should serve men, that they should cook for them and clean for them and take care of their children and do their bidding. It's an easy thing to do. It doesn't take a lot of balls. And considering how emasculated you are (because your mommy didn't breast feed you or tell you she loved you enough or whatever), I'd say that's a good thing for you.

I'll give you another analogy even though you're an idiot and don't understand them. How big of a man would it take to go onto a white supremicist site and say that they think black people should work in the cotton fields for the white man all day, because that's the way things should be. Not a very big man.

This site is filled with guys, and a lot of them have been hurt by women and a lot of them are frustrated with women and many of them would like nothing more than for women to just bow to them and obey them. So it's easy to come here and say that women should obey men and stay home and serve them and wait on them hand and foot.

Your argument lacks any real merit, because it is comprised merely of you saying, "Things should be done my way because I say so!" There is no logic or substance there. So when you say, "Women should serve men!" you get a response with an equal amount of substance: You're a f*cktard.