Improve SMV

Wilko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
595
Reaction score
133
Hey hey! Glad to see this thread didn't get ignored entirely. Hate it when good content gets buried.

Reykhel, I won't bore you with a blow by blow - but I did come to one interesting conclusion about bodyweight training.

Inverted Rows > Pull Ups... kind of

I personally found that there was no way for me to get in an effective (muscle-building) volume of pull-ups without frying my connective tissues. Form tweaks just shifted the stress around; if my bicep tendons weren't inflamed then my upper lat insertions would give me all kinds of grief.

Haven't had the same problem with inverted rows, and I think that's as much to do with the angle of pull as it is the reduced load.

Pull Ups will always be more impressive, but as a training stimulus I think inverted rows have some big advantages.
 

amazingswayze

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
766
Reaction score
203
Location
New York, USA
Hey hey! Glad to see this thread didn't get ignored entirely. Hate it when good content gets buried.

Reykhel, I won't bore you with a blow by blow - but I did come to one interesting conclusion about bodyweight training.

Inverted Rows > Pull Ups... kind of

I personally found that there was no way for me to get in an effective (muscle-building) volume of pull-ups without frying my connective tissues. Form tweaks just shifted the stress around; if my bicep tendons weren't inflamed then my upper lat insertions would give me all kinds of grief.

Haven't had the same problem with inverted rows, and I think that's as much to do with the angle of pull as it is the reduced load.

Pull Ups will always be more impressive, but as a training stimulus I think inverted rows have some big advantages.
I've never imagined this perspective but considering that I've done both, I must agree with you. Pull ups are impressive but rather vicious on the body. I think more people should practice the inverted row, even though it looks ridiculous.
 
Top