I'm Furious

[DoctorLW]

Tick, I feel for you and it's good to hear your back on the path.

However, I can't agree that sleeping with 30 guys makes her a *****. In that, I'd have to agree with her, that's pretty standard for a woman in their mid 20's. I don't know how old she is, I might have missed it when (if) you mentioned it, but I'm assuming since you got married she was at least that old.

 

[thedeparted]

Well, I can agree that sleeping with 30 dudes does a hoe make. I don't care how many opportunities hot women have. Still makes them a hoe.

Tick, I hope you do what's needed to take care of business. That is your house. Get it back. I am sick to g0ddammed death of seeing men get fvcked over by divorce laws. It is simply unjust.

But what is worse is how society makes this the standard. How you read about women who say they should ahve got married b/c at least they would have alimony and child support now. Like they DESERVE to take a man's property.

I also hope you take a hard look at current presidential candidates and ask which one of them might further such a feminocracy -- and which ones might stand for some kind of justice.

Good luck to you man!

 

[Latinoman]

She's right, a woman if she's HOT, will have been with that many guys. Hot women will always have more sexual partners. That is a fact.

That's not true.

 

[Bible_Belt]

I don't understand why you guys care so much about how many men a woman has been with? The only difference is that they get better in bed with experience. Of the two girls I am fvcking now, one has been with about 20 guys, and the other girl probably closer to 200. Guess which one is ten times better in bed.

 

[Latinoman]

I don't understand why you guys care so much about how many men a woman has been with? The only difference is that they get better in bed with experience. Of the two girls I am fvcking now, one has been with about 20 guys, and the other girl probably closer to 200. Guess which one is ten times better in bed.

Men nor women get better with the amount of partners. They get better with the amount of sex.

She can have a LOT more sex with 5 men in her life (especially if she was in a relationship with two of them) than a woman with 30 men.

It is about character. As I said...if I would never marry a woman that was in several one-night-stands or have little disregard with who she was involved. That's the way it is with me. Because I know by experience that these type of women are the ones that would have no problem cheating on their husbands, especially if things don't go their ways.

 

[thedeparted]

My main concern is diseases. Sure, you can test for AIDS. But there are 12 million other things we don't even know about yet. More partners means more exposure. That simple.

Furthermore, if she's been with 200 dudes, you are just 201, and pretty soon she's on to 202. That makes it both less of an accomplishment to get her, and more of a wasted effort when she leaves. I really doubt with numbers like that she'll ever change her ways.

 

[MacAvoy]

The problem that I have with this thread, is if you look at page 4, all the replies on this page are about the hor who slept with 30 guys. Thats not important in this case, it doesn't matter if it was 10, 30 or 200. The issue here is tick. He's the one who needs our help. Lets focus on him and improving his situation instead of whining about what a hor she is and how she women are evil and disease infested cvnts.

The good thing is he realizes his problem. He doesn't love (& respect) himself. Until he's able to come to terms with himself he isn't going to be able to be able to have the right mindset to be truly successful with women.

However he does know what it takes, its just going to take some time and encouragement from us for him to get there. Sometimes you also need a kick in the teeth as well. So now that I've kicked him, I'm here to offer my hand to help him back up.

We've all been there and bought the tshirt. Its a tough road to hoe but it can be done.

So tick, tell me what your plan is? How are you going to stop going to women for validation? Remember this isn't about what a coniving b1tch your ex-wife is, this is about you and what you want to become. Look forward not back.

 

[Mavrick]

...

 

[edger]

That's not true.

How do you know that? You have proof? The only way for you to have proof, is by being around those women daily. You probably ask, well, how do I know that I'm right? And the answer is, I really don't know if I'm right, BUT if I were to take an educated guess, I would say, well, I know if a woman is hot, she constantly has options. The majority of her options will be AFC's, but there will still be a decent share of DJ's/Players for her to take her pick from. And what do we know about the DJ/Player? He beds these women, which the women so willingly agree to. Women want sex almost just as much as we do. They are human, like anyone else, they have strong sexual appetites, and they engage in sexual behavior with the DJ/Player whenever they can.

 

[jophil28]

It is about character. As I said...if I would never marry a woman that was in several one-night-stands or have little disregard with who she was involved. That's the way it is with me. Because I know by experience that these type of women are the ones that would have no problem cheating on their husbands, especially if things don't go their ways.

This is good advice. Latman and I, and a few others here take a somewhat moralistic approach to assessing women's QUALITY. And believe me, unless you are willing to 'label' unacceptable behavior and condemn it, you can not recognise desired or 'acceptable' behavior in women when or if it appears in your cone of vision.
You have to KNOW what UP is to know what DOWN means - feeling HOT gives the the sensory knowledge to experience and recognise COLD later on.
Similarly most of us probably need to be abused by at least ONE low quality woman to define and isolate those particular behaviors which we will never accept in future relationships.
Condemnation, labeling, and categorising are valuable stategies in spite of the hand wringing outrage from the liberals.

 

[KontrollerX]

"Condemnation, labeling, and categorising are valuable stategies in spite of the hand wringing outrage from the liberals."

Even though I'm a pretty hardcore bleeding heart liberal I have to agree with the conservatives on this.

Pretty much nothing makes sense unless these things are done.

As for most of us needing to be abused by one low quality woman to know the score in life I'd have to say it may be useful to those men who weren't raised with very involved parents ie the teaching life lessons type of parents.

For the most part I think the real solution is better parenting so future generations can avoid abusive scum to get into relationships with but yeah finding this place or something else like it is preferable to learning the abusive woman lesson up close and personal as this is a safer gentler healthier means of unplugging.

 

[jophil28]

[b
As for most of us needing to be abused by one low quality woman to know the score in life I'd have to say it may be useful to those men who weren't raised with very involved parents ie the teaching life lessons type of parents.

Excellent insight KX- Distant ,or 'underinvolved' parents, raise kids who are underprepared to fend for themselves ,defend themselves or assert themselves in adult life.
Those of us who had 'cold' parents will more than likely find ourself,at some time, in a relationship with a BPD,NPD HPD or some other kind of loonie lady who presents as the genuine article but turns out to be some Academy AWard winning 'female impersonator '.

 

[jophil28]

Ooooopps X2

 

[thedeparted]

Excellent insight KX- Distant ,or 'underinvolved' parents, raise kids who are underprepared to fend for themselves ,defend themselves or assert themselves in adult life.
Those of us who had 'cold' parents will more than likely find ourself,at some time, in a relationship with a BPD,NPD HPD or some other kind of loonie lady who presents as the genuine article but turns out to be some Academy AWard winning 'female impersonator '.

Yeah, that is true. Good point.

 

[Latinoman]

How do you know that? You have proof? The only way for you to have proof, is by being around those women daily. You probably ask, well, how do I know that I'm right? And the answer is, I really don't know if I'm right, BUT if I were to take an educated guess, I would say, well, I know if a woman is hot, she constantly has options. The majority of her options will be AFC's, but there will still be a decent share of DJ's/Players for her to take her pick from. And what do we know about the DJ/Player? He beds these women, which the women so willingly agree to. Women want sex almost just as much as we do. They are human, like anyone else, they have strong sexual appetites, and they engage in sexual behavior with the DJ/Player whenever they can.

There are not that many DJs out there as you might think.

I still stand by my response.

Do NOT excuse women open their legs to an overwhelming desire for a particular group of men. Underestimating women is not a smart thing.