typical said:Bottom line is that using a prostitute is being LAZY no matter how you try and justify this behaviour you and I both know its a lazy choice.
Hmm ... if a wife allows her husband to spend family cash on a prostitute for him, that doesn't sounds all that bad. :woo: Basically, she is saying that she does not want to do her wifely duty, and would prefer to hire someone to do it for her - not a whole lot unlike a wife who hires a maid to clean the home.typical said:"Just go see that wh0re of yours if you want sex so much"
This would become the the line women would use on their "Weak" bf's or husbands. I say this because that is what is happening right now in New Zealand as being a prostitute is now a legal profession. I hear it many times when my best mates tell me their wifes/gfs have told them to go fu(k a wh0re if they want sex so bad, it hs become worse since they legalized it.
About 11 years ago, in provincial city in Russia, the going rate was $7/hr - cheaper than bowling! :yes:PappyS said:It is true the prices are too high in most rich countries, though.
See thats something you need to work on introvert/extrovert are labels that people place upon themselves and others (and I firmly beleieve this) and use it as a shield to hide away from the problem at hand.mrRuckus said:So WHAT!!!!
I know how to cook, and i still go to restaurants.
I still use a lawnmower despite having scissors.
I still use a car when i have a bike.
I still use a forklift instead of training to deadlift 800 for 10 years.
I call a plumber when my pipes are all fvcked instead of pouring myself into master plumber books.
Fvck man, sometimes you want to cut out the drudgery out of life. Chasing women is DRUDGERY. You personally might like it, but I have a small circle of friends and that is what I am happy with. "Liking to meet new people" really isn't me very often. Sometimes, though. I still get mine.
Maybe you are Mr. Outgoing, but while I'm not shy, I'm an introvert. Chatting up chicks is largely boring and draining and most have sh1tty personalities I don't want to bother sorting through.
No i haven't ever used a prostitute. I've never even given a nickel to a stripper. But I wouldn't say no permanently to the idea of it, especially as I get older and older and regardless of how cool and awesome I make myself I am going to have a harder and harder time fvcking 20 year olds who don't have the puke faces of even 'attractive' 30 year olds. I'm never going to be a stud celebrity.
Laziness? Sure. But what is wrong with that? No one is skilled at everything nor desires to be skilled at many things or even has the time to do such things. If learning to game chicks isn't a priority to him, then why should I give a fvck if some dude doesn't bother to learn it? I'm okay myself with women and a decent amount of game, but don't go around fvcking 9s all the time but I get a supply of cute 7s and sometimes an 8 that I'm happy with. But it's still a goddamn chore to go out in order to meet them. I'd rather wash the dishes than sort through the trash out there to find the one tolerable chick in a dozen. (who then gets pregnant and wants to keep it and rapes me through the justice system, which is probably less likely than with a prostitute)
WRONG. Women need us more.Single4Life said:Men have a BIOLOGICAL, evolutionary sex drive. We need women.
Women, on the other hand, don't need us at all like we need them.
So yeah. I have been for legalizing prostitution for a LONG time. It would even help with crimes. Maybe rape would go down, like date rapes etc....
Men would be a lot less frustrated because there are a lot of good people who would never go to a prostitute because it's illegal.... but if it was legalized.....
plus you would deal a serious blow to the criminal underground who would suddenly lose a lot of money and power.
and no, I have never paid for sex.
Supply and Demand eh ?? So you can either earn a tonne of money and pay for it or learn to game women and get it for free. I like the second idea way more means I can use that money and buy that cool new phone I wantLexington said:Women may need men more but generally, men want sex more than women. Women crave sex as well, but not as much as men. This is why the porn industry almost entirely caters to men. This is why female prostitution is far more common than male prostitution. A pretty significant percentage of women have a tough time even achieving orgasm and some argue that the female orgasm serves no evolutionary purpose.
Since females bear a much higher burden from sex they are much more selective. On the other hand, the male bears almost no biological cost.....so he can plow as many fields as he wants. Testosterone is the main reason that men have a stronger sex drive. Women who undergo sex change operations often report that testosterone gives them a massive increase in sex drive.
People argue that if prostitution were legalized, prices would drop. I'm not so sure about that. Even in places where it's legal, good pvssy is quite expensive. The problem is that there will always be a very high demand for good pvssy and there will always be shortage of supply.
I think that's because in most places where it's "legal", it's still taxed and regulated almost to the point where it may as well be illegal.Lexington said:Even in places where it's legal, good pvssy is quite expensive.
I was talking about supply and demand in terms of prostitution prices.typical said:Supply and Demand eh ?? So you can either earn a tonne of money and pay for it or learn to game women and get it for free. I like the second idea way more means I can use that money and buy that cool new phone I want
I don't think prostitution is taxed at any higher a rate in places where it's legal (e.g. Netherlands, Australia etc.) than most other services. Even here in the USA, any girl can sign up to be an escort. She can advertise her services online and could even do it with few or no taxes since these are all cash transactions. A quick Google search will pull up a bunch of escort services in any decent sized town or city. There are pretty much no regulations governing the escort trade. Yet even the uggs are charging high prices.kerpal said:I think that's because in most places where it's "legal", it's still taxed and regulated almost to the point where it may as well be illegal.
Sexual currency is what it's all about. This is why sluts (and prostitutes) are bad for women: they upset the social order of things. This is a good read on the subject:MatureDJ said:I was reading an article in my local rag about some 'ho's getting killed, and one of the comments got me thinking
It seems that the American wife has complete control of the sexual currency in the marriage, and because of this, husbands are much more supplicative. It seems that if husbands had an easy and affordable way to procure sexual release services, then the wives would not have so much power.
What do you all think?
1. Sluts threaten to disrupt in tact relationships and (especially) families.
2. Sluts destroy their own ability to be trusted as a wife and mother.
3. Sluts devalue the sexual currency of women in general, making commitment more difficult to obtain for those who want it.
no, I was talking about sex drive.TheAsianLoverReturns said:WRONG. Women need us more.
Go back to cave man days. Women wouldn't be able to survive without men. A pregnant woman hunt? A woman with small children protect herself?
It's only in our "modern" society where men have become "useless"
Yes, that's why it's good to see multiple women at the same time.Single4Life said:no, I was talking about sex drive.
Not about who needs who more in the overall sense. Just sex drive.
You took a quote out of context from my post and ran with it like a strawman......
An interesting observation! So poor males have the same interest in shaming prostitution, since they cannot access those women who have become professionals, with those women having been taken out of the dating pool.Sh0t said:We all understand why "normal" women frown on prostitution. It lowers their sexual value because prostitution provides easier access. However, this thread and many similar discussions also reveal than some men have an avid interest in keeping prostitution illegal, too, or at least shaming it. If prostitution were legal/acceptable, many of those easy-access sluts guys sleep with for free would suddenly start charging. Why not?
So for the men with little money but plenty of time, the idea of sluts turning into PPV is a pretty bad idea. It would also put a squeeze on how many girls are "not prostitutes" in the dating pool, as many more women would be doing it. Same thing happens now in lighter form with porn actresses and strippers. Many attractive women now are off the dating market because they are 'commercial women'. Legalized, lucrative, and acceptable prostitution would not only affect the sexual marketplace for 'normal' women, it would affect certain kinds of men as well.
Broke dudes with plenty of time but no money would probably end up losing in a widespread prostitution scenario.
This is the inverse problem with monogamy versus polygamy. Monogamy forces second-tier women to accept second-tier men, instead of being the second wife of a first-tier man. This benefits beta males and alpha women(they don't have to share their rich husband). Prostitution is this same problem,but from the opposite side of the fence. Prostitution(men sharing women) and polygamy(women sharing husbands) balance each other out.
The whole point of this site is to turn you in to a man, who can easily deal withPappyS said:The reason to pay for sex is to fvck without bvllsh!t. Straight to the point. Also to get them to fvck off afterward.