Originally posted by backbreaker
No.
they are paid a percentage of the revenue.
If they are overpaid, it's because to many people pay attention.
It's not like the goverment pays sports players.
In the NBA, the NBA teams keep 30% of the revenue, and the other 70% goes to the players.. depending ont he owner (cough, clippers, cough) it is either between 30%-70% of the revenue that goes to players.
So it's pretty set in stone by percentages.
now if you think they are overpaid, you have to take alook at why?
It's because our society puts more emphsis on sports than ever.
Because our society puts more emphsis on sports, the players, i.e the proformers are paid more.
Just like the movies.
If I am looking at a commercial, and I see Tom Cruise is going to be in a movie, I am going to see it. Period.
Because of this, TOM CRUISE is driving the people to the movies.
which means he should be paid accordingly.
If more american's picked up a book, or went outside and exercises instead of plopping down in front of the TV all day, basketball players wouldn't get paid as much, nor would any other sport, I use basketball because I am extremely familer with their Salary Cap.
I mean, it's so bad that TV compaines are putting crap on TV now just to fill in time slots.
So the problem isn't with the basketball players, it's why are they in a position to be paid that much in the first place.
right. if you play basketball in usa, you will become pretty rich, if you play soccer in the usa, you will be wealthy but nothing more.
if you play basketball in italy, you'll most likely still have to work somewhere else when you retire (even in the major league), if you play soccer in italy, in a couple of years you can retire and live a prosperous life... just because historically, basketball is far less successful than soccer in italy