I was told it was hard to get with girls b/c..

[donnyjondeppjuando]

You sound like me when I was in high school. Maybe you've been too desensitized by porn? Diversifying yourself by approaching all different types of women is great. Just find out whatever turns you on, and it's more than likely it's not just one thing. Only then, can you start finding what you want. Because being very picky about women doesn't cut it. I'm not saying go after ugly women, but look for the beauty and potential in something that may be less than expectations. And remember, you don't have to settle for anyone! So relax, have fun, and see what happens. From your posts, I'm guessing a dark skinned Asian ie. Thai/Southeast Asian is your preference?

Nope I like eastern Euro brunettes or Latin but prefer eastern Euro atm.

Think Zemanova, Aria Giovanni.

I like big breasts..I can find average chicks or fat chicks arousing if they have big firm breasts.

In fact I am also not so aroused by pretty flat chested girls.

Big boobs is a huge turn on for me.

So, I dont need to be hugely picky.

Cute face...ok
big boobs...ok
nice ass/legs...no boobs...ok

etc...

Also I find from a distance women can be less attracitve. so you can see 100 women on the street non attractive. But when you are 1-1 with a female and talking its possible to get aroused.

 

[Deadly_Ripped]

Decided to take a break from work to repost what I already said. Here's the short of it:

There are too many dudes. The male population doesn't decrease because of a lack of major wars, and because of that there is more competition now then in the past. Check this out though:

1. Read on here that something like 60% are virgins until their mid 20s!?!? So we are only really competing with like 40% of the male population (not that virgins aren't trying to get women but they are at a disadvantage, maybe 1 out of every 5 are going to be worthy competition).

If you're talking about odds of men and women, then you need to remove women as well by using the same metrics.

Virginity:
The CDC says 80% of men lose their virginity by the age of 19. Your statistics are wrong. This also assumes that virgins aren't competing with you for women. That's just flat wrong. By the age of 40, only 1 in about 300 people are still virgins. That means those guys DO get laid, eventually, and it's during the age where you're deeming them "noncompetive."

2. Homosexuality is becoming more accepted and more men are practicing this. IDK if they are included in the 60% statistic but if that's the case just something to think about. Read that its somewhere around 15% of the male population is Gay.

For every homosexual man, there's a homosexual woman. Therefore, there are as many women not interested in men than there are men not competing against you. This means that the net 'homosexuality' effect on your 'chances' relative to the total population is zero.

3. America is the most obese country in the world. The way I see it, even if you are in DECENT shape (skinny fat, slightly overweight), you have a leg up on over 50% of the male population. In Good shape, leg up on 75% and brother, if you are in GREAT shape, you are in the top 10%.

From the CDC website, there are more obese women than men. Additionally, BMI is not a good measure of being over-weight, as many men are technically overweight, but are actually just covered in muscle and they may have a little fat. I think we'd all agree that women have their 'type' just like men, but that in general women tend to like bigger guys who make them feel safe. Therefore, more men in the overweight range are competitive than are women in the overweight range. If you discount all obese people, then you're decreasing the pool of available women by MORE than you do for men. This is evidence against your original point.

#4. If you have ANY sort of game, you have an advantage over at least 50% of the male population (gotta throw in the guys who are just naturally good with women + men who studied pickup techniques).

Agreed that game make a huge difference, but I don't know where you got that 50% number. Do you really think that roughly 50% of men have game?

What does this mean? If you are one of the 40% of males in the competition, that's the start. Just get yourself out there talking to women. If you aren't gay (nothing wrong with that) then you are getting there that way too. And most importantly, if you are not fat, you have NO EXCUSE! Whether you realize it or not you have a leg up on such a large portion of the population its not even funny. If your scale for women is accurate, you should have no problem pulling 6's but you should realize that you can do much better. If you have no game, reading Pook's post from the DJ Bible would be a great start that will give you a leg up on 50% of the male population.

If you are fat, I shouldn't be the one to tell you to get into shape. Just get it done.

EDIT: Added Number 4

As far as I'm concerned, your taste in women is the biggest determinant in your chances of landing the type of woman or women you want. If you want a hottie with a great personality and a career, then you're going to need more fitness and more time to find the right kind of person when they're not in a relationship already. If you want to go pig farming every weekend, then you need to be breathing and drunk... a feat that most of us can achieve in our sleep.

I'm just saying that you're not really "competing" against men in the whole population, as we're all separated by location, preference, and random stuff like timing. Using the metrics you listed, the picture looks more grim for men than women. Then again, I'm trying to say that you can't use these kinds of metrics to try to estimate your chances with particular types of women or anything like that.