I know women are stupid, but this takes the cake!

[MatureDJ]

And she is a physician, no less!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/02/doctor-dies-chimney-lover-home:cheer:

 

[vatoloco]

Psychopath + sky-high IL = Disaster waiting to happen...

 

[Atom Smasher]

Broken link.

 

[Nutz]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/02/doctor-dies-chimney-lover-home

Did she have kids? If not she might be Darwin Award material.

 

[Warrior74]

Roissy chimed in.

http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/chicks-dig-jerks-chimney-sweep-edition/#comments

 

[dark god]

For a 49 year old she was pretty hawt. dudes game was that tight to have a DR wraped up like that.

 

[Stagger Lee]

I'm betting the guy is very wealthy and handsome.

 

[Warrior74]

I'm betting the guy is very wealthy and handsome.

And you show your bias and weakness, and your lack of faith in game. Did you watch the news story? Or read the article? He runs and engineer consulting firm and she's a doctor, they aren't to far off in social class, I'm sure he makes more money than her but not substationally wealthy. This is a guy who just knows game. If you read the article and roissy you would understand. Also if you checked the video and saw his house you'd understand as well, instead we see your insecurity...to think only a rich handsome guy can drive women nuts. Game baby, game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t_77qXYajs&feature=player_embedded

 

[Stagger Lee]

And I guess if he didn't own an engineering firm and was ugly it wouldn't matter? Yeah right. I see you are a looks and money matters denier.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Roissy chimed in.

http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/chicks-dig-jerks-chimney-sweep-edition/#comments

Lol, love his title, "Chimney Sweep Edition".
:crackup:

 

[Warrior74]

And I guess if he didn't own an engineering firm and was ugly it wouldn't matter? Yeah right. I see you are a looks and money matters denier.

Nope. I agree that looks and money matter, but it's not the first place I went to when I read the story. You did. It's your issue. What I read into it was about game. How this guy obviously had some. There are ugly dudes who run game on ugly girls, its rich dudes who run game on hot girls and it's symps at every level. Ther are good looking rich dudes who would let this chic run their life, and then there is this guy. The difference is in the man no matter what level of the game he's playing in.

 

[Stagger Lee]

And I never said he didn't have 'game'. I was pointing out that he's also fairly wealthy and probably handsome as well. So if you believe money and looks matter there must be some other reason you are so argumentative even beligerant and make things personal.

 

[Warrior74]

And I never said he didn't have 'game'. I was pointing out that he's also fairly wealthy and probably handsome as well. So if you believe money and looks matter there must be some other reason you are so argumentative even beligerant and make things personal.

I guess there must be.

 

[Todd Preston]

And I guess if he didn't own an engineering firm and was ugly it wouldn't matter? Yeah right. I see you are a looks and money matters denier.

Quite possibly could have had some money...but you don't know for sure. He could have been in Hock up to his arse.

You can pretty much bet that this Dr. had some bucks..so the money issue was probably not the case here.

However, its very sad to hear of such a lose for such a stupid thing called Love.

This women was an accomplished human being...and lost it because she lost control of her emotions and rational thinking. She obvisouly had some mental illness and became obsessed. I hate to think what she was going through as she waited in the Chimney to die.




Equally sad is the lack of empathy by the posters here. The women was obviously ill and not in her right mind.

Bragging that some elderly dude is a STUD MUFFIN because some women lost control of her emotions is just Lame and Stupid.

 

[jophil28]

Equally sad is the lack of empathy by the posters here. The women was obviously ill and not in her right mind.

If you want to express some feeling for people who suffered think for a moment about those soldiers who return with some major body parts missing because they stepped on some Islamist psycho's IED .

 

[Todd Preston]

True...but that doesn't "Negate my point!"

(you're using a diversion technique....a common practice amongst those who seek to obfuscate and dodge the point).

Hell...i can find thousands of sob stories and Tragedies online...

...but right now...we are talking about "this case."

If you want to express some feeling for people who suffered think for a moment about those soldiers who return with some major body parts missing because they stepped on some Islamist psycho's IED .

 

[jophil28]

True...but that doesn't "Negate my point!"

(you're using a diversion technique....a common practice amongst those who seek to obfuscate and dodge the point).

Hell...i can find thousands of sob stories and Tragedies online...

...but right now...we are talking about "this case."

Unfortunately, this woman brought about her own demise. Her ability to regulate her behavior was disabled . How and why ? Probably because she , like most women, never bother to acquire the skills to make wise choices based on careful consideration of the options and the possible consequences. Instead they "follow their heart" and allow their much celebrated "feelings" to lead their behavior ...and then do dumb shyte like this woman did.

Five seconds of rational thought would have convinced her that the chimney stunt was a bad idea.

 

[Todd Preston]

True...and i am not disagreeing with you.

HOWEVER
The Same emotions contained within that women are also contained within MEN as well.

MOREOVER
its more frequent we hear...the stories of MEN losing their cool and gunning down their wife's, GF, mistress, etc...AS oposed to women losing their nut and crawling down a chimney.

FINAL
The same emotional frailty contained within that DR. is also contained with in each of us....THAT'S WHY...we need to Watch our attitudes...and watch our emotions.

NOW
am i the only one who see this? ? ?

Unfortunately, this woman brought about her own demise. Her ability to regulate her behavior was disabled . How and why ? Probably because she , like most women, never bother to acquire the skills to make wise choices based on careful consideration of the options and the possible consequences. Instead they "follow their heart" and allow their much celebrated "feelings" to lead their behavior ...and then do dumb shyte like this woman did.

Five seconds of rational thought would have convinced her that the chimney stunt was a bad idea.

 

[Nutz]

Women do crazy **** all the time, it's just not as extreme (and therefore destructive). See also: "cry for attention" suicide attempts vs actual suicides. More men successfully off themselves, but more women attempt. More women are therefore crazy in that sense than men, just men are more effective/determined in their means. Males of the human species are the more extreme gender. Females are more lumped in the middle of the bell-curve. It's just how we evolved to be.

 

[john siegal]

Oh i'm with dat bro...especially when it comes to being sentenced to jail for the EXACT same CRIMES that men commit!

This world is FUVCKED UP!

Anyway,...not trying to get too emotional (gotta remember what Todd said)....



I got to remember that Females in all species seem to get the favored treatment...especially when they look good!

Good point and something to consider.

The reason it gets limited sympathy from me is mainly due to the "reversal test".

How would most feel if it was a man that did this while trying to enter the home of a woman? Would they feel sorry for the man? Or would it generate fear of the "stalker"?

One of my plates mentioned the other day that all men were potentially dangerous until proven otherwise. When I asked her how she could think like that when most men she has known have never assaulted her, she could trace it back to a movie she watched in Kindergarten where children were taught to avoid strange MEN.

She said she had such vivid memories of this "movie" that she has always thought of men as dangerous, even one walking down the street. The man would generally be considered safe if he already had a woman walking with him.

Back to the point though. Does one notice that when the woman is the "stalker" that she still gets sympathy? Whereas if a man was the "stalker", I think it's a no-brainer that the woman would also get sympathy. Rarely does the man get sympathy in either role, where-as the woman receives it automatically. The societal programming in us runs very deep.