TheLadiesMan said:
You know squirrels, I thought about that, but I want to do the blood thing. Just to be sure.
I had unprotected sex over the summer, and just trippin a little. Besides, like Sarah Silverman, "I just want to hear some good news for a change."
My life is full of ironies.... I've never had any type of STDs in my life, amazingly. So I figured....
There's no more certainty in blood testing than oral testing. Whether they use blood or not, it's the same test...an ELISA test. Same test, different body fluids.
With modern oral tests, the likelihood of a false negative is very, VERY rare, just about as rare as an ELISA blood test. Which means if it comes up negative, oral or blood, you DON'T have it.
The oral tests are SLIGHTLY more likely to give a false positive, but not much more likely than a blood ELISA test. This is because the oral test has to be slightly more sensitive to detect the presence of the virus antibodies in saliva. Usually, though, a false positive is due to an antibody build-up from some other disease, cold or flu for example, skewing the results.
Even so, if you get a negative on EITHER the blood or the oral test, you're clear. If you get a positive on EITHER test, chances are 99.5% or so that you DO have it, but they have to confirm with a Western Blot. (which is more expensive, so I KNOW your HMO didn't cover it)
I'd be more worried about something like Herpes.
Or the worst STD of all...pregnancy.