Re:
The claim behind 'legal age' is that fems are not of the 'state of mind' to handle the emotions involved in intimacy and sex.
By that 'logic', we should have law enforcement watching all marriage consecrations. Even at 21, 22, etc a woman is not of the state of mind to handle it. Divorce attorneys can attest to the 'relative instability of women.'
A virgin who's 25, or 30 is likely no more able to handle the emotions of losing her virginity unless she's married, anymore than a 14 year old freshman giving it 'the old college try with a frat guy.'
I don't think age dictates who ya tap and who ya don't. Many rappers etc, get confused by girls who are reported to be 18 and are 14. I do it all the time. It comes down to looks. Women don't start their periods at 8, 10, and 12, for no reason. That's when nature is saying
"Hey let's get some action going. Have kids, settle down. Create a family."
-----------------------
I'd like to run through a scenario of possibilities if women who were ALLOWED to marry at age 13, 14 guys of age 30, etc.
What if, just what if ...(since that is how it used to be).
Men, guys 25+, say you worked yourselves silly rich. You put aside your feminine lust (except for the occasional hore), and made yourself into a man of repute.
Then around 25-30, you were allowed to marry a new feminine beauty. Perfect, petite, round, virginal. Pure. Untainted.
WOULD YOU DO IT??
Me, absolutely. Without question. If I was 25 or 30, I'd marry a hot 16 year old, move to some less city-like area, work my tail off and raise 30 kids. I'd rather have 1 girl pure to me for my life, than 10 impure women.
This only changed because of the widespread belief that such a family is of no use to society. Two incomes, more taxes. Two incomes, more spending. Two incomes, more corporate productivity. Split the family in half, less spending. More emphasis on corporations, business, society, more productivity, more wealth to the guys at the top, less family-time.
The whole is greater than the parts.
Thing is...marriage will become popular when it presents something "ATTRACTIVE" to men. Well, what about marriage would be attractive to men?
How about marrying a young, more pure, virginal woman, who was looking to enable and support an older man in his life??
That's why guys like younger girls. IMO, anyways.
It isn't about 'tapping' some dumb girl who's probably already goofed around with a 16 year old boy.
As David Cross said, 'Why should a 16 year old boy who's got no skills and gonna pop in 2 minutes get the chance to fvck these hotties, and I don't. I got skills, let me work that sh!t.'
A-Unit
