Huked on DJB wurked fur me! [naked pictures]

[diablo]

Just posting (edited for content) pictures from last night's romp... most of you already saw her in the "lesbian night" pictures, but here's a sneak peek at what's to come... Oh, I had to add the watermark due to finding that some of the shots I've taken and posted before mysteriously found their way off of this site. With any luck this should fix that problem...

http://www.jbspencer.com/h.jpg
http://www.jbspencer.com/h2.jpg

 

[spider_007]

damn!!!!!!!!!!

 

[affliction]

Nice. Is this the same brunette from before?

 

[diablo]

Yep, same as before... I'm just getting her to "open up" more around me (well... my camera).

Thought that I put this in AE; moved from DJD to AE.

 

[spider_007]

YOU HAVE MY RESPECT

 

[Jay-X]

diablo for president of pùssy-land!

 

[Caldus]

Holy cow man. You gonna keep her?

 

[WesCottII]

She's got an unfortunate affliction.

 

[JH6]

god ****ing damn.

 

[Delta Male]

I agree, pics are cool, but without a FR, they're just porn.

-Dan

 

[diablo]

Originally posted by SuperGigaloDJ
Mind giving us a field report how you got this one?
And some misc. tips on it?

Originally posted by Delta Male
I agree, pics are cool, but without a FR, they're just porn.

If you'd do a search on posts I've made, you'd have found this has already been done before.

The post in question is my second in the thread (including the one creating the thread):

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=68413

 

[Fenderules]

very cool

 

[TheRelic]

You da man!!!!

 

[Bigsnake]

Wow... Awesome D. Your DJ skilz are many many times higher than mine... You must teach me the way...

 

[rgeere]

Why are you guys fawning over the fact that diablo got a girl to pose for him naked in front of a camera? It sounds desperate and creepy considering any idiot can see a woman naked if he is persistent enough.

And besides, this girl obviously has very loose morals to begin with. Parade a exceptionally beautiful woman around who has some morals and decency, then I'd be impressed.

 

[rgeere]

Originally posted by SuperGigaloDJ

Actually, the key word here is self-respect ... I wasn't attacking anyone, just a matter of observation.

 

[rgeere]

Originally posted by SuperGigaloDJ
Hey me and my girl are gonna make a homemade porno soon. Does that mean she has no self-respect?

That's entirely the point ...

 

[diablo]

Well, the fact that you're registered on a site dedicated solely towards showing people methods by which they can attract and (for the most part) engage in pre-marital sex with members of the opposite gender should negate any qualms you have regarding the virtues or morals of said women. Regarding loose morals in particular, without knowing the events that transpired, history, or person in question it's easy to spout out rhetoric over a message board, when you haven't the foggiest of the particulars of the situation.

Perhaps if you'd had a history of chastising the people who post field/lay reports (not that there are that many, but enough) that the girls they seduced had loose morals and no decency then I'd have expected such a response from you, but since you don't, it seems rather random that you've "found jesus" in the last 20 minutes...

Another thing, about the "any idiot can see a girl naked if he's persistant enough" - is this what you actually believe? If so, and it's true, then we should by all means do away with the DJ Bible. After all, who needs ideas, methods, and strategies if the only thing any of us have to do to get any girl is "be persistant"? Someone needs to get on the phone with Mystery, Gunwitch, Ross Jeffries, and every other self-proclaimed seduction guru and let them know of this startling revalation, for it's bound to spell out in no uncertain terms the ending of their profits!



As to the FR, there isn't much to it. A normal "back to my house" for a few orgasms for each of us. I've been warming her up to the idea of taking pictures, and while she still wasn't particularly excited by the idea, she obliged anyway (as 2 of the results show). If you're wondering how I actually got her in the first place, around a year back, then that's contained in the other thread. And no, it wasn't by 'being persistant'.

 

[diablo]

Originally posted by diablo
The post in question is my second in the thread (including the one creating the thread):

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=68413

Originally posted by SuperGigaloDJ
Eh. Couldn't find it!

Since apparently it's too difficult to click the link, look at the first post I made (the "first" post of mine there), then go down until you see my name making another post (which would make it the "second" post in the thread for non-math majors...), I'll quote it here...

Originally posted by diablo
We've been sleeping together for about 10 months now, so remembering what was said and done during our early conversations and dates would be impossible, unless you're a licensed hypnotist and can come here and extract the information from my subconcious memory. I can tell you the basics, though. I didn't use much C&F, for the fact that I don't really feel ****y fits me too well. I framed most of our conversations on neg-hits, keeping her constantly peppered with fresh replies to anything she'd say... I'd argue everything with her (fun arguments, not serious ones). Then I'd switch it off and be sweet for a day or two before turning it back on. All of this she loved, saying "Damn, I can never win with you!", "Nobody else tells me I'm wrong!", etc etc... I also let her know some of the things that were going on in my life, and told her interesting stories of things that had happened or that people had done in the recent past... without opening up too much regarding my own self. There were a number of times that she mentioned "You know so much about me, but I don't know a lot about you!"

The first couple of dates were nothing but action ones - doing stuff, then I started slipping and we went out more to movies, etc. After a month or two, I found another girl (Jodi, the cumdumpster) and basically ignored Holly for the better part of 4 months... keeping in touch maybe once a week. Just about every night I'd get a text message "night" or something along those lines from her. Jodi and I ended, and I picked things up with Holly... at which point I stopped neg-hitting her so often and we started spending more time together. Now I've introduced her to many of my friends (as is obvious from the pictures... lol) and we're doing things on a regular basis. I don't have any specific articles to link you to, but suffice to say that I read the DJB in it's entirety; I recommend downloading the offline version and going from file to file reading them and applying what you've learned to your own life...

Hope this helps.

BTW, it wasn't a flame. It merely pointed out several fallacies in his line of reasoning - flaming is a/n "insulting criticism or remark meant to incite anger" (according to dictionary.com).

 

[rgeere]

Originally posted by diablo
Well, the fact that you're registered on a site dedicated solely towards showing people methods by which they can attract and (for the most part) engage in pre-marital sex with members of the opposite gender should negate any qualms you have regarding the virtues or morals of said women. Regarding loose morals in particular, without knowing the events that transpired, history, or person in question it's easy to spout out rhetoric over a message board, when you haven't the foggiest of the particulars of the situation.

The problem here is that you are assuming that because you are here to engage in premarital sex means that this is a site dedicated solely to the purpose. Not all men who visit here are interested in premarital sex, and to assume so on the basis of the status of a moderator has no bearing whatsoever. From my understanding the bible as a resource appears to have something in mind for all men, whether that be for marriage or one night stands. I don't see any particular bias in any one direction or the other nor on this website or in the forum except for occasional personal opinion that often conflict.

As for what you said about my knowledge of minute detail or aspects, I already stated that my thought on 'self-respect' was an observation and I was attacking no one, except that I was basing it on what was told to us, which doesn't serve to change my mind any.

Perhaps if you'd had a history of chastising the people who post field/lay reports (not that there are that many, but enough) that the girls they seduced had loose morals and no decency then I'd have expected such a response from you, but since you don't, it seems rather random that you've "found jesus" in the last 20 minutes...

I wasn't chastising anyone, I was making a point to the men who felt impressed by this that it isn't that big of a deal. Personally, I wasn't really all that impressed. But then, I am also satisfied and feel fulfilled in my life in general; others may not be.

As far as finding Jesus goes I do have a Christian background, I have studied, Greek, Hebrew, speak German, and have a dual degree in Religion and Psychology. If you do a search in my name you will find that I do not have the same judgemental outlook in relation to women and this website when it comes to religion. If anything, I have proved that there is a major correlation between many of the things in the bible [christian] and bible [dj], and that many who speak against the bible [christian] and the bible [dj] don't really have a solid basis for their objections. In an argument, I defend both to a degree. Religion is not an issue here.

Another thing, about the "any idiot can see a girl naked if he's persistant enough" - is this what you actually believe? If so, and it's true, then we should by all means do away with the DJ Bible.

Yeah, that does sound demeaning. I apologize.

As far as being vague that was intentional, as I left the context wide open to interpretation. Persistance is also denoting a 'lack,' meaning that thereis an apparent or unseen reason to work. For example, some guy could pay cash to see a woman naked or maybe she just volunteered. Either way, it is not that impressive.

After all, who needs ideas, methods, and strategies if the only thing any of us have to do to get any girl is "be persistant"? Someone needs to get on the phone with Mystery, Gunwitch, Ross Jeffries, and every other self-proclaimed seduction guru and let them know of this startling revalation, for it's bound to spell out in no uncertain terms the ending of their profits!

But the bottom line is that if you can't regard the woman as a whole, and you can't regard yourself as a whole. sex is seen as insignifigant to those who do see themselves as complete individuals. People such as Mystery, Gunwitch, Jefferies, have the most influence over people who can not think for themselves or have had society decide their status in life. [ either they missed the latency/genital stage of development or have a high external locus of control, etc.]

If you think that I am totally against premarital sex, that would be a bad assumption. The bible [christian] emphasizes an assertive outlook and a development of an internalized locus of control. It provides a means of correction for those who were not able to function in a positive and social atmosphere during the genital and latency stages of development [as defined by freud and erickson]. Alpha type male personalities form from the lack of self-esteeme envoked during these periods causing them to develop tools to hide their lack of self-esteeme and worth [arrogence, ****iness], control is more important than taking risk
with their outlook being majorly pessimistic and minorly optomistic, which adds to mystery and sex appeal.

On the other hand, Beta type personalities maintain a higher level of self-esteeme and attract girls with good self esteeme. Confidence is real and apparent, risk is more often taken and there is a good deal of trust. The primary outlook is majorly optomistic and minorly pessimistic, which promotes a safe enviroment succeptable to change.

In both cases, alpha and beta type personalities develop during the latency and genital stages of development depending upon biological and enviromental factors regardless of gender [so there are alpha male/females and beta male/females]. In almost all cases, you will often find that alpha types attract alpha types and beta types attract beta types. However, you will occasionally find alpha types and beta type attractions based upon misunderstandings of character [beta female thinking an alpha male is beta and or alpha female thinking a beta male is alpha].

So in reality, it is rediculous to say that women are attracted specifically to an alpha type or a beta type. Alphas develop because they missed the latency stage of development, but hit the genital stage of development. Betas hit the latency stage of development and miss the genital.

A typical textbook AFC could probably haved missed both the genital and latency stages of development for some reason or another.

A few rare individuals hit both the latency and genital stage of development perfectly, and are able to develope both alpha and beta tendencies.

Back to the point, the biblical emphasis is on responsibility to God, yourself, and the community. Marriage is an assertive means to establish sexual intimacy and a way for a family to grow safely. In certain contextes premarital sex is neither a good or bad thing, but is frowned upon.