Ronaldo7
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 803
- Reaction score
- 178
It isn't necessarily "anti-social". The correct term would be unconventional. One can be unconventional, yet lurk very close to the surface of social settings.@Ronaldo7 Not investing emotion into any of those things is anti-social. Your tactic is destructive and there's not a snowballs chance in hell I'll ever agree on this garbage. Fvck cynicism, it deteriorates us when instead we could accomplish greater things working together for mutual benefit. Your strategy is that of a leech, all take and no give.
Destructive? From what perspective? I respect your opinion if you decide my post is "garbage", but i completely understand your view on it. You demonstrate to be an emotional individual. One who must abide by morals & imposed social principles.
You must understand human nature to be selfish. One chases after one's objectives only. It is only a fool who believes others will work honestly on helping another being achieve their desired goal. Human nature is to be individualistic. Only when the objective is mutual will collectivity take over.
You and i will only work together to obtain a common goal. Otherwise, nature's law dictates natural selection. Eat or be eaten. Survival of the fittest.
Women are emotional creatures. They are governed by ever-changing desires. One is subjected to conform to their changes of attitude, which are derived from pure emotion. The rational individual understands this to be a flaw and one should not mind those who act out of emotion. Therefore, one just takes the emotional part out of the equation.