How much do you help an EX

hithard

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
608
Reaction score
84
Location
Australia
Ok on friendly terms with the Ex(against my usual thinking,but we have a child together).The problem is she's been asking me to do a lot for her.Ive let her know that shes pushing the limit.And we are not together.
We only broke up a short time ago (3 weeks or so).I cant say theres any feeling left.But should I be helping out at all.Im not talking about things to do with my son either. I have my son more than half the time.So Im not skimping on that part.
I think its a case of her wanting to run around with other guys and using me as security blanket.Now I dont care about the other guys thing.Hell have fun.But I dont want to play the role of care taker to her.I'd like to keep things on good terms.It just makes the whole situation easier.But I'd rather not have to be around her or pretend its happy families.
So where do you draw the line.My thoughts is I'd rather not see her, or hear from her for a few weeks.But this chick is a hopeless flake.I worry about my son when he is with her.She was a bit of a nutter through out.And turning into a drinker.Really bad selection on my part.Never try to save a girl.
 

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
340
Age
56
Location
Nevada
Originally posted by hithard
Never try to save a girl.
This should be a proverb.

I once counseled a guy who'd married probably one of the most passively self-serving, yet remarkably ignorant woman I've ever experienced and not only had he married and divorced her once, but did so 3 times! No kidding, the man got back with his ex wife twice. Both never had children together, but she had her first son at age 16 with another father and he had 2 daughters from a previous marriage prior to her. So needless to say they each had made some very poor life decisions in their history.

The reason I'm using this example for you is that as tough as this guy was - he was actually, the Jerk/Biker boyfriend guy that women love - he had a very accute martyr complex with regards to women. Even after his third divorce to this woman and had assumed half her debt load and was paying spousal support, he still persisted in helping her out with household chores in her new home and doing home repair and servicing her car. They hadn't had sex in the last 3 years of their marriage (what ultimately led to the divorce) and he knew full well that she was seeing the CFO of the company she was a secretary at (extreme golddigger), but the guy still wanted to play husband for her and she was all too happy to accept it.

He's moved on now, but it took a while for him to shake off "the more you suffer, the more it shows you really care" mentality. Too many guys who were fiercely independent as singles, revert to AFC habits in LTRs. It's not your responsibility to save any woman. You have the added complication of having had a child with her, so you are going to be intimately involved with her for a lifetime, but that said, her wellbeing isn't your responsibility. Not now anyway.

When guys get involved in situations like this it's very similar to single guys having pseudo-'friendships' with women after a LJBF rejection that the guy accepts and feels responsible for maintaining it. You become a surrogate boyfriend - or husband in this case - offering all of the benefits and securities of being a husband without any expectations of her reciprocating intimacy for them. It's an ideal situation for a woman really, allowing her the luxury of not being entirely responsible for her own decisions and looking for other guys whom she will have sex with. It's analagous to guys with a Booty Call; unlimited access to unlimited sexuality with no expectations of reciprocating security or committment to her.

Stop being her surrogate. You're not doing yourself or her any favors by reinforcing her expectations of you as a husband when you are no longer in a mutually rewarding relationship. You're not playing on the same team any more and you only increase her expectations of your support (financially, emotionally, utility, etc.) by playing husband for her. By doing so, you in effect excuse the consequences her decisions merit. Don't give her a free pass. Live up to your responsibilities as a father to the best of your ability and let this be your martyrdom if you have to cling to it. A strong father should be your childs reward, not your ex wife's.
 

SAYNO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
520
Reaction score
25
Age
57
Location
Dallas
Words of Wisdom..

Rollo Tomassi is right.

My brother fell ino thes ame trap after he divorced his wife (she was screwing some guy she worked with). He keep paying all her bills in addition to child support.

Then when he found out that he had a tumour on his liver he called her up for some moral support.


But guess what this lying, cheating, knieving, ***** did?

When he called to tell her the bad news she simply hung up in his face!


After all he had done for her she didn't even care if he was dead.

These bvtch's out here are sick


Sayno'
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
hithard...it's really hard to say whether or not you're helping more than you should without you giving examples of the things you are doing to help.

First and foremost...if anything you do to help benefits your child or prevents your child from suffering hardship then you aren't really helping your ex, but rather helping your child. As long as the things you do are being done for the sake of your kid and not in an attempt to get your ex back then I'd say do whatever you feel like doing to help.

As the mother of 3 teenagers whose father refuses to do his part to support them, I'm going to give you a word of advice and warning.

If there is something you could do that would prevent your child from suffering any kind of hardship or having to go without things and you didn't help provide for that child they will resent you for it. And if it's a common thing they will grow to hate you. I'm seeing that with my 3 kids from a 10 year marriage. Not a one of my older 3 kids will even speak to their father at this point. They are extremely angry with him because while they went without he was buying himself new boats and cars and not paying a red cent in child support. I managed to get by supporting them on my own...but it was a struggle and they did have to go without a lot of the things they really wanted to have.

If your ex is without food that means you child is, too. If her car breaks down and she doesn't have the means to get it fixed...then your child won't get to the doctor if he or she is sick and there will be no trips to buy groceries or pay the electric bill or rent.

If you are directly or indirectly helping your child by helping your ex and she genuinely NEEDS help, then if you can help for the sake of your child, you should.

That doesn't mean that you should let her take advantage of you, though. THe best way to determine if it's something you should help with is to ask yourself how your decision to help or not help will affect your child.

Having a good parenting relationship after splitting up is lucky for you. Feel fortunate you don't have to deal with a nightmare of an ex. It would be much easier to tell you if you're doing too much to help if you gave some actual examples.
 

Desdinova

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
4,717
If you and this woman can't work together to raise a child, then you'll have to deal with her on a business-only level. Keep the best interest of your child in mind, but avoid letting her reap the benefits that come with helping the child.

Sorry Wyldfire, but I have to disagree with you on this one. If her car breaks down, she can use the bus or call someone else for a ride. If the child gets sick, that's when she can call for some assistance and get a ride to the hospital. If her car breaks down and she can't drive to her boyfriends place to have anal sex, that's her problem.

My brother fell ino thes ame trap after he divorced his wife (she was screwing some guy she worked with). He keep paying all her bills in addition to child support.
I have a friend who's gonig through something similar. He's paying her rent and paying her bills while he's living at his dad's place. I've tried talking some sense into him by supporting his child's needs (ie diapers, baby food) while letting her worry about the rent. If his child needs a place to live, the child can live with him.
 

MacAvoy

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
35
Location
Northern Ontario
Rule #1, don't take advice from a women on how much is too much for your ex. She'll play the bleeding heart role, well you should do whatever you can because it will only be the kids your hurting blah blah blah.

Take it from me (someone in the same boat for 7 years). I do too much, and if I give and inch, she'll expect a mile tomorow. It starts off w/ a ride to the grocery store, next thing you know she wants to borrow your car.

Set your limits, if she don't like them, tell her she should have thought of that before she broke up w/ you, or if you broke up w/ her (she should have thought of that before she pushed you away - it's always her fault remember)

VERY IMPORTANT - when you don't give in, she'll try use the kids as hostage. She'll say the groceries are for the kids, etc.... Well if she's the primary care giver, it is her responsibility. If she doesn't like it, she can pass that responsibility on. Also keep a written diary of everything. No judge will make a judgement against you for visitation as long as you are paying what you are suppose to and having regular visitation. If she tries saying, well you can't visit the kids cuz your not helping me, simply tell her, "now look who's not caring for the kids, using them as a hostage. If you really cared about your kids, you would want them to have a caring father in their life"

If you need any further advice down the road, ask, I've got way too much experience on this subject, and I would be happy to see another DJ not have to go through the same mistakes I've made.
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
Des...is her car is broken down she can't get to work, either. If she doesn't get to work she can't pay her bills or buy food for her child. No car = child suffers.

I'm not saying he should pay for her car to be fixed. I'm saying that if he is good at working on cars then he should take a look at it and see if he could fix it if she has no one else who can help her. Or he could help her get to work, run errands, etc.

Like I said...it's good for him to help her if doing so keeps his child from suffering or going without. If she's just asking him to help her do insignificant things that she doesn't NEED his help with for the benefit of their child, then he shouldn't help.

Just because they broke up doesn't mean they no longer need to cooperate and raise that child as a team. Parenting is totally separate from the romantic relationship.
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
Originally posted by MacAvoy
Rule #1, don't take advice from a women on how much is too much for your ex. She'll play the bleeding heart role, well you should do whatever you can because it will only be the kids your hurting blah blah blah.
Just because I happen to have tits it doesn't mean that I am like your ex or that I will play the "bleeding heart" role. In fact, I don't ever ask my ex for anything. I never have. When I left him, I took only the kids, our clothing, birth certificates, shot records, social security cards, a few personal effects (what we could carry) and left him 2 cars, the house, all the furniture and everything else. I didn't want anything but my freedom and to escape his abuse.

When I refused to take him back and divorced him he refused to pay the child support the judge determined he should pay. His reasoning was that if the kids didn't live with him it wasn't his responsibility to help support them. I NEVER put a price tag on my kids. I didn't deny visitation over his refusal to help support the kids. The only time I denied visits was when the kids were a bit older and didn't want to go with him due to him being emotionally abusive to them. They refused to go with him.

My kids despise their father now. They honestly think he's scum because his neglect caused them to have to go without a lot of things they never should of had to go without. I've always busted my ass to support my kids and their father has not contributed to supporting them at all. He doesn't even send them birthday or christmas cards or gifts. Of course, he always promised them tons of material things, gifts and lots of love if they would go live with him. He just can't understand why they hate him so badly.

I've seen first hand what happens when the father places his anger or dislike of his ex above the needs of his children. I'm simply warning this man that he needs to love his child more than he dislikes his ex...because his child WILL notice if he doesn't.
 

Desdinova

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
4,717
Wyldfire, it is HER responsibility to provide for herself. It is both the parents' responsibility to provide for the children.

It is entirely possible to live without a vehicle. When my vehicle breaks down, I take the bus while it is being fixed. I used to take a cab home with a trunk full of groceries.

If she's short on cash for the groceries, the father can go buy groceries for the child. If she has no money for groceries for herself, she can fvcking starve or get support from someone else.

If the child is living with her, it is HER responsibility to put a roof over her and the child's head. If she can't pay the rent, the child can live with the father.
 

SAYNO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
520
Reaction score
25
Age
57
Location
Dallas
Originally posted by Desdinova
Wyldfire, it is HER responsibility to provide for herself. It is both the parents' responsibility to provide for the children.

It is entirely possible to live without a vehicle. When my vehicle breaks down, I take the bus while it is being fixed. I used to take a cab home with a trunk full of groceries.

If she's short on cash for the groceries, the father can go buy groceries for the child. If she has no money for groceries for herself, she can fvcking starve or get support from someone else.

If the child is living with her, it is HER responsibility to put a roof over her and the child's head. If she can't pay the rent, the child can live with the father.
Yep, my brothers ex-wife ruined his credit and health, his health wouldn't have gotten so bad if it wasn't for him payingall her bills and calling complaining that her car was broke down and she needed extra money for this or that. He even gave her money for christmas and how did she repay him?

Well later on she went back to court and had the child support increased.

Yes, let that cvnt starve to death or get up off her fat ass!

:mad:

Sayno'
 

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
340
Age
56
Location
Nevada
WYLD: I understand your point and I can genuinely sympathize with your experience, but you have to know that the statistics aren't in a man's favor in situations like this. 90%+ of custody settlements end in the woman with sole custody or physical custody in the case of joint visitation and has been so since the 60s, even when the man can provide better financial security for his child. Also add to this that it is singularly a woman's choice to bear or not to bear a child, even when men want a woman to have the child it is her decision that decides whether she terminates the pregnancy or carries it to term - the man is absolutely powerless in this legally, emotionally and financially. I'm not advocating abortion - if anything men need to be well in charge of their own birthcontrol (i.e.wear a condom) - I'm only illustrating that it is a woman's call in this regard and both parents must bear a lifetime of consequence for HER decision.

No one's accusing you of playing any 'bleeding heart' role, however, you chose to bear not one but 2 children with a man who you and they now despise. Unless your kids are twins, at some point you thought this was a good decision. You are personally responsible for this consequence and limitations that you put on yourself and them. Not a flame, just putting things in perspective.

In my internship, I can tell you that the far more common occurance is the reverse for men. Until there is a legal mandate for itemized reciepts for a woman's spending of child support funds, this is going to be the case. I can think of two more men I've counseled that are in the exact reverse of your situation right now. One just got custody of his 2 daughters after 9 years only because her boyfriend was sexually abusing them and supplying her drug habit. He'd made child support payments to directly enable her addiction. He explained to me that when they came to live with him he literally had to buy them beds and clothes because their mother never purchased these for them. Another guy had a child with a woman he'd only had a 3 month relationship with who now makes his decisions for him becasue she knows his financial status (working poor) and threatens to petition for full custody if he wont submit to taking their son whenever she wants to go out or needs other service from him and completely violates their custody settlement. The sad truth is that she could probably do just this since he's financially unable to hire the legal counsel he'd need to fight her in court.

Popular media loves to decry men as Deadbeat Dads, but never do we hear of the statistically much more common manipulative women who control their sperm donors emotionally and financially.
 

SAYNO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
520
Reaction score
25
Age
57
Location
Dallas
Excellent post Rollo!


Sayno'
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
Originally posted by Desdinova
Wyldfire, it is HER responsibility to provide for herself. It is both the parents' responsibility to provide for the children.

It is entirely possible to live without a vehicle. When my vehicle breaks down, I take the bus while it is being fixed. I used to take a cab home with a trunk full of groceries.

If she's short on cash for the groceries, the father can go buy groceries for the child. If she has no money for groceries for herself, she can fvcking starve or get support from someone else.

If the child is living with her, it is HER responsibility to put a roof over her and the child's head. If she can't pay the rent, the child can live with the father.
My car broke down recently. I missed almost 2 weeks of work and couldn't get to the store to buy groceries. There is no public transportation where I live and a cab to work would have been $30 one way...IF one were even running. I work 3rd shift. There isn't always other ways to do things. Not everyone lives in the city.

If a father would not help out in a situation like that for the good of the child they aren't much of a parent. You can't just ship kids from parent to parent. Stability and school is far too important to do that.
 

Desdinova

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
4,717
My car broke down recently. I missed almost 2 weeks of work and couldn't get to the store to buy groceries. There is no public transportation where I live and a cab to work would have been $30 one way.
Who's responsibility is it to have a backup plan?

- Get a ride with someone from work
- Move closer to work so you can walk
- Buy a bicycle
- Walk home with the shopping cart

I don't care what anyone says, a car is a luxury. Granted, it makes things easier, but it's not a necessity.
 

SAYNO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
520
Reaction score
25
Age
57
Location
Dallas
Wow

Well, my heart goes out to single mothers, who are single through no fault of their own, but there are two different points being tossed around in this thread:

There is a difference between someone doing somthing to supplicate someone's habit be it drugs, excessive shopping or whatever.

If I was giving someone child support money and they used it to fix thier car that is okay, its also okay even if i had to pay a little extra to help get it done, knowing that its in the benifit of the child.

But, at some point if things got to be excessive I would definetly just try to sue for full custody. However, I do believe that things should be kept civil in matters such as this!


Sayno'
 

Kenturkey

Don Juan
Joined
May 28, 2002
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Location
Lexington, KY
personal responsibility....

If you can't afford to have the means to get yourself to your job, that's your fault. It's like me taking a job in L.A. and living in lexington and complaining i can't afford the plane ticket every day to commute.

I chose to live within 3 miles of my office. If I can't drive to work, I can ride my bike or even walk if i have to. It wasn't accidental.

If women want a man to work on their car and pay their bills so they can raise their children, they need to stay with the father to begin with. ESPECIALLY if they stood up in front of everyone and said "til death do us part, i do." Men are at fault too, tho--I won't deny that. There are men who just leave one day. But, in 70% of divorce cases it's the women who file them.

My take on it is that as long as there are laws that force men to think of women as equals, then women can pony-up and act like it.

Think of it this way, the man is supposed to come work on her car when it's broken. Does he get to call her when his dishwasher breaks? "Hey babe, I don't have any way to wash my dishes. Would you come wash them for me? Er, excuse me, your children won't have clean dishes to eat off of if you don't come wash these dishes for us."

Chris
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
Originally posted by Rollo Tomassi
WYLD: I understand your point and I can genuinely sympathize with your experience, but you have to know that the statistics aren't in a man's favor in situations like this. 90%+ of custody settlements end in the woman with sole custody or physical custody in the case of joint visitation and has been so since the 60s, even when the man can provide better financial security for his child.
I know that a lot of women tend to be greedy and selfish. I also know that a lot aren't. Basically, if the man left the woman she's bitter and tries to screw him over. If the woman leaves the man, he's bitter and vengeful. At least in my case, my ex cries and whines about how evil and rotten I am when I'm actually about the easiest person to deal with in this respect there could be. Despite the fact that my ex has not contributed at all financially to the raising of our children (we have 3 kids from a 10 year marriage) and I've never taken him to court to try to collect child support he still whines about how greedy I supposedly am. The fact is...he's just still bitter over me leaving him 11 years ago.

[QUOTE}Also add to this that it is singularly a woman's choice to bear or not to bear a child, even when men want a woman to have the child it is her decision that decides whether she terminates the pregnancy or carries it to term - the man is absolutely powerless in this legally, emotionally and financially. I'm not advocating abortion - if anything men need to be well in charge of their own birthcontrol (i.e.wear a condom) - I'm only illustrating that it is a woman's call in this regard and both parents must bear a lifetime of consequence for HER decision.[/QUOTE]

Our children were conceived and born while we were married. It was actually his idea to start having kids. I was too young and stupid to realize it at the time, but it was his way of trying to make sure I didn't leave him.

No one's accusing you of playing any 'bleeding heart' role, however, you chose to bear not one but 2 children with a man who you and they now despise. Unless your kids are twins, at some point you thought this was a good decision. You are personally responsible for this consequence and limitations that you put on yourself and them. Not a flame, just putting things in perspective.
Rollo, anyone who has paid any attention to what I've posted about my relationship with my ex husband knows that I take full responsibility for the choice I made. I was an idiot, young and had no idea what I was doing or wanted. And I had 3 children in my marriage...now ages 19, 17 and almost 15.

In my internship, I can tell you that the far more common occurance is the reverse for men. Until there is a legal mandate for itemized reciepts for a woman's spending of child support funds, this is going to be the case. I can think of two more men I've counseled that are in the exact reverse of your situation right now. One just got custody of his 2 daughters after 9 years only because her boyfriend was sexually abusing them and supplying her drug habit. He'd made child support payments to directly enable her addiction. He explained to me that when they came to live with him he literally had to buy them beds and clothes because their mother never purchased these for them. Another guy had a child with a woman he'd only had a 3 month relationship with who now makes his decisions for him becasue she knows his financial status (working poor) and threatens to petition for full custody if he wont submit to taking their son whenever she wants to go out or needs other service from him and completely violates their custody settlement. The sad truth is that she could probably do just this since he's financially unable to hire the legal counsel he'd need to fight her in court.
You're talking about a drug addict...not the average divorced mother. As for itemizing child support...let me say this much about what my ex was supposed to pay and what raising my kids actually cost. My ex was only ordered to pay $50 a month for 3 kids combined...not $50 each child. That didn't even cover a week's worth of food for the kids. I'd gladly itemize the cost I incur each week supporting my children with receipts and all if I'm guaranteed half of those costs from my ex. The truth of the matter is this...child support typically doesn't even come close to covering a quarter of the actual cost the custodial parent incurs. For me...3 kids mean 3 bedroom apartment. If it were just me I could rent an efficiency and it would cost about $400 a month. I have to pay around $1000 a month due to the fact that I have those children to house. Should my ex have to pay $300 of the extra rent each month? Two teenage boys eat a lot of food. Two carts of groceries a week usually. Should my ex have to pay another $300-$400 a month in food costs as well? That doesn't even cover the cost of carting them around, buying their clothes, etc. I WISH my kids only cost me what most men have to pay in child support. So...I'm all for itemizing and collecting receipts for how child support is spent providing I get reinbursed for 50% of the expenses of raising the kids that child support DOESN'T cover.

Popular media loves to decry men as Deadbeat Dads, but never do we hear of the statistically much more common manipulative women who control their sperm donors emotionally and financially.
Again...there are a lot of idiots out there who try to hurt each other through their children. A lot of women DO put a price tag on their kids and won't allow visitation if child support isn't paid. That's wrong to do. It's also wrong not to pay child support, too. That situation is typically 6 to one and half a dozen to the other.

It's no better for a man to refuse to help support his child because he is bitter and hates his ex. It's not the kids' fault that the adults can't get along and quite often can't behave like adults. Yes, if the mother has a drug or drinking problem then the father should be seeking custody anyhow. But if she doesn't then it's idiotic for the father to refuse to pay child support just because he thinks the money won't be spent on the children. The custodial parent usually ends up spending twice the amount of child support or more on supporting the child anyhow.

Now, my ex went on a motion filing rampage last summer. Our 16 year old son made it clear that he did not want to see or speak to his father. The boy is over 6 feet tall and wears a size 13-14 shoe. I'm all of 5 foot nothing. If he wanted to see his father, he would see him. My ex accused me of not allowing my son to see him. Yeah, right! lol. He accused me of this AFTER I let our younger son go live with him because that's what our son wanted to try. The ex ended up physically assaulting him and landed his ass in jail after about a year...and my ex only allowed our son to visit twice in that year...TWICE...and they lived an hour away. HE did the very things he kept accusing me of. Oh, then when he found out that I was in Maine with my dying father at a hospital he filed for an emergency hearing to try to get custody of our older son who didn't want to see him. He knew I didn't get notification and where I was...but he didn't say a word. I almost got held in contempt of court over that one. Then of course he filed to have the child support he never even paid to begin with to be lowered. He never showed up to the final hearing on that one, either. He just likes to use the courts to harass me. It's really a shame that he hates me for leaving him more than he loves his children. And now he's paying for it...they all hate him for it. I don't hate him...I pity him.

My ex will rant and cry to anyone who will listen about how I'm the miserable one and all these horrible things he is convinced that I'm doing when the fact is...he's the one who's behaving like an idiot. Twice I smoothed things over for him with our oldest son. Even after he had severely abused me for years. I still tried to get along with him for the sake of the kids. It's impossible to do. He's certifiable.

I have a 5 year old daughter with another man. I asked him to trust me when we went to court and that I would make sure things were fair for him. He did trust me and as a result I insisted on shared custody and rights so his child support would be lower. We only went to court that one initial time and we agreed on everything. If I ever needed anything for her, all I would have to do is ask and he'd be there in a heartbeat to help. In 5 years the only time I asked was when my car was broken down and I needed a gallon of milk for her. He has offered to help many times, but I turn it down.

Clearly my ex has created his own difficulties regarding our divorce...because he's bitter and wants to punish me for leaving him in the only way he can...through our children.

I think it would be a real shame for the starter of this thread to be lured into taking on the attitude of harming his relationship with his child just because some guys on here don't get along with their exes. It sounds like he gets along fairly well with her...and he really should try to keep it that way. Helping out when you can when it benefits your child is good. Doing her laundry, cooking for her or doing things she can do herself or allowing himself to be taken advantage of is bad. Doing something that directly or indirectly helps your child isn't being taken advantaqe of...it's being a good parent.
 

Desdinova

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
4,717
Wyldfire, it really sounds as if you're continuing to blame all your hardships on your ex's non-financial support.

You're in this situation now, and b1tching about your ex not supporting your kids isn't going to help anything. If I were to blame my parents for all the hardships I endured after I was forced to move out, I wouldn't have gotten anywhere.

Deal with his 5hit as it comes. You've been away from him for 11 years, I would have thought you would have adapted to your situation quite well by now.

Is your 19 year old still attending school? If not, is he working and paying his share?
 

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,108
Reaction score
28
Originally posted by Desdinova
Wyldfire, it really sounds as if you're continuing to blame all your hardships on your ex's non-financial support.

You're in this situation now, and b1tching about your ex not supporting your kids isn't going to help anything. If I were to blame my parents for all the hardships I endured after I was forced to move out, I wouldn't have gotten anywhere.

Deal with his 5hit as it comes. You've been away from him for 11 years, I would have thought you would have adapted to your situation quite well by now.

Is your 19 year old still attending school? If not, is he working and paying his share?
No, I don't blame him. He's mentally ill...he can't help it. It's an annoyance, though...who wants to keep going to court for frivolously filed motions?

The whole point of telling about my situation is to show the impact being bitter and miserable and looking for problems with the other parent of your child when there aren't any is just plain stupid. He gets along with her...he should keep it that way. It doesn't mean he should run over and wipe her ass for her at the drop of a hat....but if she genuinely needs some help and whether or not he helps her impacts his child then as a parent, he should help. If he doesn't it could have an adverse affect on how his child views him.

I was answering Rollo's post, too.

The whole issue with men not wanting to pay child support because they don't have proof of where the money is spent is USUALLY just something to complain about. In the case of an addict or alcoholic, or an genuinely unfit mother...the man has grounds for seeking custody anyhow. But in the average case...the custodial parent spents 4 or more times the amoung of child support she or he gets each month to provide for the child.

The message I want to get across is: LOVE your child MORE than you hate your ex.
 
Top