How long to wait for sex???

[mr.buick]

I think three dates is adequate. Usually the longer she makes you wait, the lousier the sex will be. If nothing happens after three dates, move on. There's a lot of women out there who won't make you jump through these hoops.
John

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by DJ_Dork
but people are different and have different waiting times to completely trust another

is this a joke?
Yah like how a brad pitt or tom cruise lookin dude would wait or a guy with equal looks or fully alpha or an average looking joe off the street whos seduction skills has the chicks panties soaked is left "waiting".... please

I laugh at people when they say sex is considered 1/3 1/2 of a relationship.

then i would leave you in stitches i reckon,
this is some odd sh!t for a young man to be saying unless your an unhealthy eunich.

 

[El Campeon 56]

Personally, I fully expect to go into the first date with sex happening that night. As i read not too long ago another DJ had the same mindset, and I agree fully. If you are in tune with your skills as a DJ it is very simple to get a girl turned on and ready for sex the very first time you go out with her. She will feel some mystic force that draws her to you sexually and will not be able to stop your advances. At least this is what i have seen when I have my game on that night. Because as we all know women want to have sex just as much as we do, it's just making the pieces of that puzzle fit the first time out together

 

[ShortyBrown]

This is such a load of $hit. If getting a lay on the first date, floats your boat like i said, good luck. If that's what BOTH parties want.
People who are so eager to f*** on the first date are insecure about their looks and mistakenly believe that having sex with a person will reinforce their belief that they are attractive.
A woman can sense it if you are and it's a turn off, just like you blokes are turned off by a desperate chick.

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by ShortyBrown
This is such a load of $hit. If getting a lay on the first date, floats your boat like i said, good luck. If that's what BOTH parties want.
People who are so eager to f*** on the first date are insecure about their looks and mistakenly believe that having sex with a person will reinforce their belief that they are attractive.
A woman can sense it if you are and it's a turn off, just like you blokes are turned off by a desperate chick.

Oh for fvcks sake, enough with this sh!t.
SEX IS ENJOYABLE its not some sacred bloody mystik journey 2 people embark on, its FUN, why do people insist there is more to it?
THESE ARE MEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, and to ALOT of men alot of the time fvcking is no more than a release.
and guess what ? its alot of fun for the women aswell.

A woman can sense it if you are and it's a turn off, just like you blokes are turned off by a desperate chick.

agreed chicks smell desperation.

 

[ShortyBrown]

Originally posted by ( . )( . )
Oh for fvcks sake, enough with this sh!t.
SEX IS ENJOYABLE its not some sacred bloody mystik journey 2 people embark on, its FUN, why do people insist there is more to it? agreed chicks smell desperation.

I understand that, and I am not trying to take anyone down the path to enlightenment here. These are just my thoughts, helpful or not they shouldn't be taken out of context.
You're damn right sex is enjoyable. I've even had it a few times. Making a habit out of putting the hard word on a girl early on in the piece says to me that you either acting too keen to get the pie and she's legging it faster then you can whip it out, or your either the type of person I described in my pervious post. I am not a stuck up prude. there's nothing wrong with casual sex. As long as you are responsible.
But there is confusion here. It seems to me that the original poster is after something with a bit of substance, and trying to base things on sex, which is not going to get him anywhere.

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by ShortyBrown
Making a habit out of putting the hard word on a girl early on in the piece says to me that you either acting too keen to get the pie and she's legging it faster then you can whip it out,

i should hope putting the hard word on some chick and making her feel some sort of pressure would have been left with all the other shameful AFC traits.

 

[ShortyBrown]

Originally posted by ( . )( . )
i should hope putting the hard word on some chick and making her feel some sort of pressure would have been left with all the other shameful AFC traits.

Again you are taking what I say and twisting it to your own agenda.

I give girls 1-3 dates to give it up. If im not really into them and they dont give it up after the first date then I dont talk to them any more.

I think three dates is adequate. Usually the longer she makes you wait, the lousier the sex will be. If nothing happens after three dates, move on.

A DJ considers himself a real man right? Real men don't think that they are entitled to sex because they waited a whole THREE dates to get it. A woman who is leading your around by your d!ck should be easy to recognise. They are the ones who are on a power trip and making you "jump through hoops". Don't generalise that all women who don't have sex with you after a week are power trippers.

It seems to me that the original poster is after something with a bit of substance, and trying to base things on sex, which is not going to get him anywhere.

Making a habit out of putting the hard word on a girl early on in the piece says to me that you either acting too keen to get the pie and she's legging it faster then you can whip it out, or your either the type of person I described in my previous post. I am not a stuck up prude. there's nothing wrong with casual sex. As long as you are responsible.

I will stand by that till the end.

 

[OzzyBoy]

I would wait about a month before deciding to do it at the earliest.

 

[( . )( . )]

i cant be arsed talking about this sh!t any longer, its overcomplicating something so trivial.

personally ive never waited any longer than 3 sessions of seeing a chick to bang her, but i know for a fact if she was to start with imature crap like "lets wait" or something equally dumb, then its the NEXT bus for her.

on a side note, ladies can we keep the advice on relationships to what works and not how you want it to work, this place is becoming bloody ridiculous.
if you cant give out straight to the point advice (and it can be done ive seen other chicks do it here) or get sidetracked by explaining how desirable you are, then keep the advice for strictly cologne and fashion tips.

and this still stands

 

[marqZAL]

SEX IS ENJOYABLE its not some sacred bloody mystik journey 2 people embark on, its FUN, why do people insist there is more to it?

AMEN!!! Sex is very enjoyable. Also, sex is a basic human function like eating, sleeping and shlttting. There is no real need to think sex is much more than what it is. However, if its not up to par, why settle for anything less than what you desire???? If I go to a reasturant and the meal is good i'll go back again. If it sucks I wont...why would anyone go back for more???? Why would anyone keep seeing a girl who didnt satisfy thier needs sexually????

 

[princelydeeds]

Originally posted by ShortyBrown
People who are so eager to f*** on the first date are insecure about their looks and mistakenly believe that having sex with a person will reinforce their belief that they are attractive.
A woman can sense it if you are and it's a turn off, just like you blokes are turned off by a desperate chick.

I don't think you have enough experience to make that statement. I'm not at all insecure about my looks, or my game. I like sex bottom line, The only thing better than pvssy is NEW pvssy. I love having sex with a new hottie, it makes me happy, its what I like to do. I don't supplicate. My wants/needs/desires/ are very important and I make sure I get what I want. I don't put my wants/needs/desires on the back burner for any chick until i decide she is someone who is worth my time and intimate feelings.

I like bonin on the first date, point blank. The sooner the luvin the better the luvin. Just becasue I want it soon doesn't mean I am desperate. Honestly, if she doesnt give it up sex is only a phone call away. I don't think Shes a hoe or slut for bonin me too soon. I respect a woman who knows what she wants and goes for it, way more than some chick whose panties are soakin wet but is worried Im gonna judge her or not call her the next day.

You are operating out of a feminist mindset. Sex is bad, if you like sex you're insecure. Im a man, wasn't I designed to have sex with women? Why is doing what I was desgned to do a sign of insecurity. I would argue that all these touchy feely thoughts about waiting, time limits, and being emotionally connected are what truly is unnatural. The real question is what kind of devil has made MEN ashamed for desiring/wanting sex?

 

[ShortyBrown]

Originally posted by princelydeeds
I don't think you have enough experience to make that statement. I'm not at all insecure about my looks, or my game. I like sex bottom line, The only thing better than pvssy is NEW pvssy. I love having sex with a new hottie, it makes me happy, its what I like to do. I am not bagging you out here. Whatever turns you on man.
I don't supplicate. My wants/needs/desires/ are very important and I make sure I get what I want. I don't put my wants/needs/desires on the back burner for any chick until i decide she is someone who is worth my time and intimatefeelings. Hello??? it's the same thing for a woman. We're not all interested in leading you all around by your d!cks. It's a big thing for some women to get their gear off for a guy,and they are thinking about whether you are special enough for them to do that with.

I like bonin on the first date, point blank. The sooner the luvin the better the luvin.why is there such a culture of that here? Just becasue I want it soon doesn't mean I am desperate. no it doesn't. That info applies to some situations, not all. Honestly, if she doesnt give it up sex is only a phone call away. I don't think Shes a hoe or slut for bonin me too soon. I respect a woman who knows what she wants and goes for it, way more than some chick whose panties are soakin wet but is worried Im gonna judge her or not call her the next day.There's a solution to that. Tell her, and don't make it sound like a load of $hit.

You are operating out of a feminist mindset.You are generalising, and telling this to a woman who knows that when she feels like it, she can and does go out and get it. Sex is bad, if you like sex you're insecure. Im a man, wasn't I designed to have sex with women? Why is doing what I was desgned to do a sign of insecurity. I would argue that all these touchy feely thoughts about waiting, time limits, and being emotionally connected are what truly is unnatural. The real question is what kind of devil has made MEN ashamed for desiring/wanting sex?

cant be arsed talking about this sh!t any longer, its overcomplicating something so trivial.personally ive never waited any longer than 3 sessions of seeing a chick to bang her, but i know for a fact if she was to start with imature crap like "lets wait" or something equally dumb, then its the NEXT bus for her

I see what you game is now. you see women as a way to get your d!ck wet and if you think that you can't, you move on. Very shallow.

 

[marqZAL]

I see what you game is now. you see women as a way to get your d!ck wet and if you think that you can't, you move on. Very shallow.

Please, stop the male feminist bulll****!!!!

 

[iqqi]

Also, sex is a basic human function like eating, sleeping and shlttting

you dont f@ck by yourself....and if you look at sex like it is as simple as those previously mentioned functions, you are indeed shallow.

but all women have learned that so many men think like you all who support this idea. women are not shocked by this thinking, it is precisely why many will not "give it up" until they trust you. it is your opinion, true dat. and it is their opinion to find someone who shares their opinion that sex is more complicated than shltting.

 

[ShortyBrown]

Originally posted by iqqi
you dont f@ck by yourself....and if you look at sex like it is as simple as those previously mentioned functions, you are indeed shallow.

but all women have learned that so many men think like you all who support this idea. women are not shocked by this thinking, it is precisely why many will not "give it up" until they trust you. it is your opinion, true dat. and it is their opinion to find someone who shares their opinion that sex is more complicated than shltting.

Sing it sister.

MarqZAL-Don't be a flamer. I am as sick of this femminist $hit as you. These women are giving women like me a bad name. F**k them all to high hell as far as I am concerned.

P.S:grow up.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

I don't get the whole "schedule thing" for waiting for anything dealing with the sexes. Why wait? Just get your mojo into gear and make her want you IMMEDIATELY.

 

[Jay26]

I think 3-5 dates is a maximum usually, if you're not getting it by then you probably jumping through hoops already.

 

[marqZAL]

you dont f@ck by yourself....and if you look at sex like it is as simple as those previously mentioned functions, you are indeed shallow.

Shallow...NO!!! A realistic MAN.....YES! Sex can be special, but most of the time sex is just sex!!!!

I think 3-5 dates is a maximum usually, if you're not getting it by then you probably jumping through hoops already.

If a girl makes you wait longer than 3-dates, unless shes a teenager, then theres a very good chance that she has issues and has hang ups about sex. Im 25 and I mostly date women 23-30, women in this age range on average will give it up in 3 dates. Because if they are intrested and turned on by you, they will be wanting to have sex with you on the first date...but will wait as not to appear a slut!!! But, if they have been shlt on in the past they will usually make you wait longer because they have trust issue , even though they could have banged 100 guys before you. As for ladies who wont give it up because they are religous fanatics are not for me to begin with...I find thier though art more holier than thou attitude disgusting! I might be going to hell but alteast i am going to enjoy the ride!!!

Lets face it if your dating a women and they dont want to **** your brains out...why in the world would you want to be with somoene whose not sexually attracted to you??????? For me I want someone who I turn on immensly!!!!

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by marqZAL
Shallow...NO!!! A realistic MAN.....YES! Sex can be special, but most of the time sex is just sex!!!!





If a girl makes you wait longer than 3-dates, unless shes a teenager, then theres a very good chance that she has issues and has hang ups about sex.

I agree. Either you're comfortable with sex and enjoy it enough that you know what precautions you need to take to have a good time without being put into unsafe circumstances. And of course you need to be in a certain mindset to be able to handle the joys of sex without attaching meaning to it when it doesn't exist. Not the easiest thing to do for most but definitely doable.