I don't want to post this in regular forum simply because majority of its audience will not be able to discuss this in a serious and objective manner.
Is homosexuality an insult to manhood? In case of lesbians, is it an insult to womanhood?
Think about it. Homosexuals do not follow their natural gender role. Some might say that there are plenty of heterosexuals who don't follow their natural role as a man or a woman. But homosexuals CHOOSE to not follow their natural role. Gays CHOOSE to lust after feminine characteristics and qualities. Lesbians CHOOSE to lust after masculine characteristics. Your typical AFC has the potential to choose to follow masculine characteristics. But your typical gay will laugh at the idea of masculine characteristics and instead run off to next audition of The Vagina Monologues.
Evolutionary, homosexuals are a factor in natural selection. They are selecting against the human population. They hinder the procreation process and stagnate the growth of a relative genetically fit population. Even with the advent of test tube babies and in vitro fertilization, realize that not every individual in the world has access to these medical "revolutions". Ergo, if every body in the world was gay, only the rich and healthy would be able to pass on their genes via in-vitro.
What are your ideas, insights, and observations?
Is homosexuality an insult to manhood? In case of lesbians, is it an insult to womanhood?
Think about it. Homosexuals do not follow their natural gender role. Some might say that there are plenty of heterosexuals who don't follow their natural role as a man or a woman. But homosexuals CHOOSE to not follow their natural role. Gays CHOOSE to lust after feminine characteristics and qualities. Lesbians CHOOSE to lust after masculine characteristics. Your typical AFC has the potential to choose to follow masculine characteristics. But your typical gay will laugh at the idea of masculine characteristics and instead run off to next audition of The Vagina Monologues.
Evolutionary, homosexuals are a factor in natural selection. They are selecting against the human population. They hinder the procreation process and stagnate the growth of a relative genetically fit population. Even with the advent of test tube babies and in vitro fertilization, realize that not every individual in the world has access to these medical "revolutions". Ergo, if every body in the world was gay, only the rich and healthy would be able to pass on their genes via in-vitro.
What are your ideas, insights, and observations?