Originally posted by TesuqueRed
jeeezuusss fvck, dudes...will you all cool it and take it up elsewhere?
he had an interesting enough point in post #1. it calls for those with club experience (or any other type) to bounce ideas off it and see what flies. is it true? not true? something in between?
i usually don't bother with 9s and 10s as they're waaaaaay too much upkeep involved with them (i have a short attention span on certain things) and i can't be bothered offering what they want. so 9 & 10s and me have worked out a truce: i ignore them and they ignore me (gettin' to be a crank in my old age, ya know..)
someone who did bother with them (a short, nasty fat dude with balls to spare I once knew) let it drop one time that 9 & 10s are the easiest to score because all that anyone approaches them for is to get in bed. so they expect that's the way it'll go, that's all they ever knew.
they're not the best in bed, however, since all they expect to do is lay there and take it (once read an article about aging (read early 30's) hollywood trophy babes taking a course on how to give BJs since they were about to be replaced by younger models and had to, ah, improve performance--absolutely priceless article and would've been a good piece of evidence in support of that last comment.)
anyway, that was his view of it
from another angle: Ben Franklin had it when he said to date the ugly ones, because in the dark you can't tell and they're so grateful
and my experience? if you want a rockin good time, go for over 30 or in the 3-7 range (or both). i can't do under a 6.0 myself, but i can extrapolate enough to make that call with a fair amount of certainty
i won't say the thread got hijacked as bickering breaks out now and then (whaddya expect here, right?) but it was an interesting enough observation, and fun, too, where i think we need to get back to it -- with observations , experience and comments on point.
bytch-slap each other elsewhere for the moment :cuss: :box: :trouble:
brother. awesome post.
I consider myself a bit of a clubbing expert, but in honesty, I don't approach the 9s and 10s..
a. they are hard as hell to find.
b. 7s and 8s still look good.
but i think most importantly; the key to success is in the approach. I'm sure we all agree. now look at it mathematically.
take a club with 1000 people.
lets assume that its 400 girls 600 guys. (we know guys always outnumber girls.)
now lets say that girls who are worse then 3 don't go to clubs. -to me, to be worse then 3, you're going to be VERY obese AND/OR have missing limbs AND/OR have some disabled type things going on. -if you're any of these things guys, i mean no offence, but i've never seen any of these types of girls at clubs. the worst i've seen is a big fat cross eyed blonde girl with bad teeth, she'd get a 3.. but everyone else, a 4+
anyway, i'm going off track.
so 400 girls > 3.
lets say we've got 20 4's. 80 5's. 100 6's. 100 7's. 80 8's, 20 9's. -going by the you can't really find 10's.
now lets also assume that 50% of these 9's are taken.
this leaves us 10 9s.
you've gotto make your way through 390 other girls just to find them.
going back to a good approach being the key to success. you've got perhaps one 9 at best who you can make a good approach on. eg. she's not dancing with a group of her friends. she's not having a deep chat with a guy or another friend.
you've got much better odds with the 40 single 8s to find some that you can actually approach in a good way.
I think with a good approach, it doesn't matter if you're the 1st or the 100th guy to approach. what matters is the approach and some social proof/looks/charm.