Had a hilarious realisation about modern weddings

[Awwwdasaaa]

I started thinking about modern weddings when i realised that its all a joke….

however when my brain got to the father walking the bride down the aisle i lost my **** laughing.

when a father walks the bride down the aisle, the father is passing the responsibility of the woman from him to the groom. Everything she has done up to this point has been his responsibility. He is responsible for her preserving her value.

as promiscuous as women are nowadays, the bride has probably taken hundreds of creampies at this point and sucked on atleast 20 schlongs. And the father walks her down the aisle like shes BRAND NEW!!!

Convincing the groom as he approaches, like a used car salesman, hey man shes got 300 thousand miles on her, but she starts every time, and she gets you from A to B.

He might as well be wearing clown makeup when he does this, because every single person at that wedding is more likely than him to know of the schlongs she has taken. Some of the girls probably know of 10 of those schlongs, and probably even shared them. Some of the schlongs might even be attending that same wedding!!!

Little does the father know, that his daughters beaver has just finished the DAKAR RALLY!!!
He passes it off as SHOWROOM condition!!

is there a greater disrespect to a man, than to have his modern day daughter walk beside him down the aisle???

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Comical guys actually believe that women in the past didn't have other dudes she was banging. Enough with the nonsense that women are more promiscuous these days. They were just far more careful not to talk about it back then.

Research has shown people in the 1940s and 1950s have reported more sexual partners on average than people in the 2000s. This "modern promiscuous woman" drivel people keep promoting is nothing buch a bunch of horsesh!t people have made up in their own minds and are attempting to pass off as truth even tho it has no basis in reality.

Get real. Even the kings and queens had other people in the court they were banging.

 

[manfrombelow]

Haha, thanks for the good laugh, OP, I enjoyed your analogy about the father as the car salesman and his daughter the champion of the Dakar Rally. Fuvcking gold!

However, don't get too blackpilled over this.

Men fvck, women fvck, everybody fvcks. It's the drive to fvck that's been driving our civilization this far. I've no problems with that.

The only truly bullsh!t and ridiculous thing is the cost for the whole wedding party, the honeymoon vacation, the wedding gown and suit, the new car and so on knowing 95% of them ended up in divorce eventually.

 

[manfrombelow]

Comical guys actually believe that women in the past didn't have other dudes she was banging. Enough with the nonsense that women are more promiscuous these days. They were just far more careful not to talk about it back then.

Research has shown people in the 1940s and 1950s have reported more sexual partners on average than people in the 2000s. This "modern promiscuous woman" drivel people keep promoting is nothing buch a bunch of horsesh!t people have made up in their own minds and are attempting to pass off as truth even tho it has no basis in reality.

Get real. Even the kings and queens had other people in the court they were banging.

I allow myself to believe in the fact that the average woman in the past banged less than the average woman in the present days, simply because of social restraints, the risk of having pregnancy (the contraceptive pill wasn't invented until the 1960s), and less opportunities (they didn't have Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook and Internet as a whole back then).

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see this and understand this.

 

[SW15]

Weddings Mean Nothing - Here's How To Prove It - Alpha Male 2.0

There’s a very interesting article right here about the percentages of newlyweds unsure about the wedding and whether this correlates to the four year divorce rate, which is the first big spike among divorces, statistically speaking. -By Caleb Jones The four year mark is about right, since as...

alphamale20.com

I read this around the time that there was a flurry of weddings in my social circle. It helped me realize my path was a decent path.

 

[Am Shaegar]

Comical guys actually believe that women in the past didn't have other dudes she was banging. Enough with the nonsense that women are more promiscuous these days. They were just far more careful not to talk about it back then.

Research has shown people in the 1940s and 1950s have reported more sexual partners on average than people in the 2000s. This "modern promiscuous woman" drivel people keep promoting is nothing buch a bunch of horsesh!t people have made up in their own minds and are attempting to pass off as truth even tho it has no basis in reality.

Get real. Even the kings and queens had other people in the court they were banging.

This is wrong. Until the 20th century it was a common tradition in rural Europe to have the hymen of the bride pieced on the wedding bed by a female member of the grooms family and the bloody bedsheet was hung outside the window for all to see. If the bride didn't bleed the wedding was broken up and the bride lost her face in the village.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Weddings Mean Nothing - Here's How To Prove It - Alpha Male 2.0

There’s a very interesting article right here about the percentages of newlyweds unsure about the wedding and whether this correlates to the four year divorce rate, which is the first big spike among divorces, statistically speaking. -By Caleb Jones The four year mark is about right, since as...

alphamale20.com

I read this around the time that there was a flurry of weddings in my social circle. It helped me realize my path was a decent path.

The harder part is that what now realization thereafter? Off rip, going against the crowd by not following the beaten path isn't without consequences. Aarons new book attempts to answer that question for the majority of unplugged men, what to do now in a "post marriage world?" Even without a wife, I think men could careless being a bachelor, loving it. I think it's lineage or lack thereof will be the biggest hurdles men will have to grapple with.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Comical guys actually believe that women in the past didn't have other dudes she was banging. Enough with the nonsense that women are more promiscuous these days. They were just far more careful not to talk about it back then.

Research has shown people in the 1940s and 1950s have reported more sexual partners on average than people in the 2000s. This "modern promiscuous woman" drivel people keep promoting is nothing buch a bunch of horsesh!t people have made up in their own minds and are attempting to pass off as truth even tho it has no basis in reality.

Get real. Even the kings and queens had other people in the court they were banging.

I don't think there was ever a time line that women were better behaved although I think everything is on 4k and full display. I struggle with the thought it was always this way. Female entitlement and debauchery was never this blatantly obvious. Furthermore they were not as fat or repugnant. While I suspect like promiscuity was always a thing, religion and the culture kept it in check in ways we don't anymore. Women being a ***** is championed in society.

Our grandfather's never made the money we do and we're able to find high caliber women far less red flags than the so called best of 2022.

We're blessed to have these shakes broken for good. As OP pointed out, free from the burden of responsibility of women's poor choices. Our grandfather's weren't so lucky.

There's no denying what a dumpster fire the smp is today. Feminism has run a muck. I'd argue it's a symptom. There's run away inflation. Money printing. It's all the same ****ery. Child support, divorce court, mandates, root beer floats.

There's always been only 1 enemy; that being any obstacle impeding a man's individual sovereignty and freedom.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

This is wrong. Until the 20th century it was a common tradition in rural Europe to have the hymen of the bride pieced on the wedding bed by a female member of the grooms family and the bloody bedsheet was hung outside the window for all to see. If the bride didn't bleed the wedding was broken up and the bride lost her face in the village.

And the ancient Romans and Greeks had public orgies regularly, so I think you are way oversimplifying things.

Additionally by the end of the Middle Ages, adultery was so common it was no longer grounds to dissolve a marriage.

But yeah...nobody had sex back then. You are right.

Decameron Web | Society

 

[SW15]

The harder part is that what now realization thereafter? Off rip, going against the crowd by not following the beaten path isn't without consequences. Aarons new book attempts to answer that question for the majority of unplugged men, what to do now in a "post marriage world?"

I've had consequences for being a 39 year old, never married, and childless guy. Most of the social circles near my age are dominated by couples. Established couples, usually married, don't want me around nor do I want to be around them. Unattached/marginally attached men over a certain age are going to be lone wolves to some degree.

 

[Bokanovsky]

And the ancient Romans and Greeks had public orgies regularly, so I think you are way oversimplifying things.

Additionally by the end of the Middle Ages, adultery was so common it was no longer grounds to dissolve a marriage.

But yeah...nobody had sex back then. You are right.

Decameron Web | Society

Neither statement is historically correct. There were no "public orgies" in Ancient Greece and Rome. That is a myth. I am sure that some wealthy Greeks and Romans engaged in orgies in private but it was far from common. The female participants in such orgies would undoubtedly be slaves. Regarding adultery, it was not grounds for divorce when committed by a man. It was absolutely grounds for divorce when committed by a woman.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

I've had consequences for being a 39 year old, never married, and childless guy. Most of the social circles near my age are dominated by couples. Established couples, usually married, don't want me around nor do I want to be around them. Unattached/marginally attached men over a certain age are going to be lone wolves to some degree.

At the risk of sounding again like a sociopath, I think it's preferable to blend in. In these scenarios, I wouldn't preach RP or boast about picking up barely legal just turned 18. I've gone to these events with some young baddie. It's great to troll. You dunk on everyone. The dudes are mirrin &&& the fat wives are raging. Invites will drop off. Self awareness is huge.

I expect that same fate. To mitigate the following I make new friends usually younger. I pull much younger than me. I'm cognizant to exercise discretion in mixed groups especially when 8n the environment you speak of. I won't half step but I won't flaunt it especially when with childhood friends. Not everyone can handle seeing the way the world actually is.

 

[Am Shaegar]

Additionally by the end of the Middle Ages, adultery was so common it was no longer grounds to dissolve a marriage.

But yeah...nobody had sex back then. You are right.

My mother was born in the 60s in Germany, in the 70s her mother divorced her father. This made my mother a social outcast and people told their children to keep their distance. They had to move constantly because of her mothers status of a divorcee.

When my parents divorced in the late 90s getting divorced was like a fashion wave. You went to school and talk to your classmate about the recent divorce of their parents like they just got a new car.
My grandparents on my fathers side however were ****ing livid and treated it like somebody burned the church down and raped the local priest. They treated it as an insult to the family's legacy. My mother went from the next in line to be the families matron to an untouchable on the level of a prostitute for my grandparents.

And all of that happened in atheist liberal post war 20th century West Germany. Imagine how this would have gone down in previous centuries or in less developed more conservative countries. Anyone who tells you that divorce was socially accepted in the past of Western Societies is selling you the Brooklyn Bridge.