Great post from CL

[Oxide]

This one really explains a lot of things well. I would pay close attention.


http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/about/best/van/152468438.html

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Interesting even though it's not objective. I'd like to know what made this guy come to write this post (damn, these psychology classes I'm taking seem to permeate my very being :nervous.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Not meaning to derail the thread but I found another post on CL that merits reading for its entertainment value (at least to me). It's a post pointing out the delusions of a particular woman who may need to rethink her selection criteria for men.

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/about/best/nyc/185232520.html

 

[Bible_Belt]

I saw the first CL post. It re-affirms much of the DJ wisdom.

Nobody gives a **** about your problems. Nobody ever will. I know that sounds harsh, but it's the reality of being a man.

The only way to have a happy life is to develop one for yourself, then leave an opening for someone else to come and share it with you.

 

[Oxide]

Not meaning to derail the thread but I found another post on CL that merits reading for its entertainment value (at least to me). It's a post pointing out the delusions of a particular woman who may need to rethink her selection criteria for men.

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/about/best/nyc/185232520.html

There is so much funny in this post it hurts. Amazing analytical abilities, Bravo to whoever wrote this piece.

 

[Bonhomme]

This is Bible material. The one on the gal's criteria is priceless, though I think he was very generous with some of the percentages, which should probably have narrowed it down to 1 or 2 men. I oughta have a go at that sort of analysis on some online chick who has an absurd "laundry list," and see what kind of hate letter I get back.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

This is Bible material. The one on the gal's criteria is priceless, though I think he was very generous with some of the percentages, which should probably have narrowed it down to 1 or 2 men. I oughta have a go at that sort of analysis on some online chick who has an absurd "laundry list," and see what kind of hate letter I get back.

What an intriguing idea (if you post the responses you get back)...

 

[Hitman10000]

Nice find.

 

[Chaos-Knight]

I read most of it

Good stuff!

:rockon:

 

[ProDJ26]

man this needs to be put into the bible seriously

 

[Rollo Tomassi]

women want to maintain the self-delusion that they already understand men. Women everywhere claim that they understand men and that "men are simple creatures." The truth is that women haven't a clue where most men are coming from and furthermore they care only insofar as they want to control us. Nonetheless, they want to maintain the fiction that they have us figured out.

It's a pride and status thing. A woman who doesn't "understand" her man can't control him, and a woman who can't control her man is a loser. The more you try to explain yourself, the more complex and multi-dimensional you become (a.k.a. "difficult"), and the less she can claim to understand you.

Fukking Gospel! I've been preaching this forever, but the guy nails it - respect.

 

[In Like Flynn]

This is already in the Bible, folks: http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16343.

 

[ScrewIt]

Something similar
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/89q3/women.607.html

 

[Oxide]

Something similar
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/89q3/women.607.html

What a ****ty advice. There are 2-3 decent points within that load of nonsense. Save your time read what I posted again.

 

[WesCottII]

Brilliant.

 

[Oxide]

BUMP this is awesome, especially as he gets into it.

 

[Trojan]

This guy is spitting str8 game. The Truth.