good girls vs sluts

[Dominant]

Originally posted by PuertoRican_Lover
DJ Dominant, you are trying to pick a fight! I written on this issue many times - the hor mindset is a dangerous mindset and there is such a thing as morality! You will only learn when one of these hors drags you through the mud

No I'm not trying to pick a fight. Look at your original post and see who's really trying to pick a fight. Look at the way you talk to me.

You say there is such a thing as morality. I believe in such very strongly. However, if you were to actually display your morality instead of writing in such a brash manner, than your initial response to my thread would have been much different.

You would have addressed the issues at hand and explained yourself, rather that stating "you have a warped sense of morality!" and blah blah blah.

Like T.I. said, buddy, "You don't know me". So quit acting like you do.

And no, no chick is going to drag me through the mud.

And lastly, what is with you? You address women as "hors", which isn't far from what I think about them, and then you disagree with me? It seems like you disagree more with the people who are stating that all women aren't capable of being sluts.

And no, I'm not going to search for your previous posts. Either explain yourself in detail here on this post or quit addressing me...

You and your exclamation marks...

-Dominant (damn right I'm a DJ)

 

[FM 3321]

All girls are the same in my opinion. I don't like calling girls sluts.

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: good girls vs sluts

Originally posted by Dominant
Alright that's just straight a f'd up thing to say. So people who have sex relatively quickly or easily have no self-respect and sub-standard morals?

NONSENSE! I have dated the sweetest, nicest, most moral girls and have had sex with them quickly. No drinking, no drugs, no exploitation.

There's absolutely NOTHING wrong with these women. They had sexual desires, and when the opportunity came they took it. It was not a reflection of their self-respect or morals. They didn't do physical or emotional harm to themselves or others.

This is the statement that doesn't make sense - Hors are moral??? Since when?? Hors also harm themselves and others - physically, financially, emotionallly etc..

It is your stayement that I have a problem with and not you - don't take it personally!

 

[Dominant]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: good girls vs sluts

Originally posted by PuertoRican_Lover
This is the statement that doesn't make sense - Hors are moral??? Since when?? Hors also harm themselves and others - physically, financially, emotionallly etc..

It is your stayement that I have a problem with and not you - don't take it personally!

These girls I had sex with relatively easily and quickly. Someone said any girl who does this does not have morals. I say this is not true because these girls I had sex with quickly and easily were moral.

They did not harm me financially or emotionally. They were good people that treated others well. They had sex with me quickly, which would put them in the "slut" category. But, they weren't immoral girls. They were perfectly fine girls. If you met them, you would genuinely like them as decent human beings.

My points are:
1. All women have the capability to have sex relatively quickly and easily.
2. Women who have sex relatively quickly and easily aren't necessarily immoral sluts.

Any more questions, feel free to respond.

-Dominant

 

[JonJack]

Morality is in the eye of the beholder.

Personally, I try my best not to see actions as either right or wrong. For me the intentions of a person is a better gauge of a person's morality.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

Originally posted by PuertoRican_Lover
DJ Dominant, you are trying to pick a fight! I written on this issue many times - the hor mindset is a dangerous mindset and there is such a thing as morality! You will only learn when one of these hors drags you through the mud

Don't waste your time on this young fool, PRL. He's hopeless. I've seen his other posts.

This place is being overun by male feminists.

 

[Dominant]

Originally posted by Don Juanabbe
Don't waste your time on this young fool, PRL. He's hopeless. I've seen his other posts.

This place is being overun by male feminists.

Male feminist?

I'm on this thread saying all women are sluts. Your boy PRL is telling me I'm lacking morality and that women are going to burn me.

So who's the male feminist, me or PRL?

Women burning me. Hah. If a ***** ever tried to disrespect me she'd get a tight backhand right to the mouth. I'm not ****ing around. I'm not symp, and I don't take **** like some *****.

You talk a lotta **** but you can't back it up. Show me where on this thread I say anything "feminist". Show me on ANY THREAD where I say something "feminist".

You can't because you can't back up the **** you speak. I haven't said anything feminist since I got here.

Everything I have been saying is masculine and to the point.

I'm sick of people like you. People talking **** but can't give a decent argument why I'm wrong. No wonder people leave this site and talk so much **** about SoSuave. I spend half my time here defending against punks who keep talking **** but can't back it up.

And the reason I get so much **** is because I speak the truth. Anyone who preaches the truth gets a bunch of insecure ****s hounding them.

"The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." -Larry Winget

-Dominant

 

[geneticperfection]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: good girls vs sluts

Originally posted by Dominant

My points are:
1. All women have the capability to have sex relatively quickly and easily.
2. Women who have sex relatively quickly and easily aren't necessarily immoral sluts.
/B]

Inclined to mostly agree - instead of 100% of women, I'd probably say 90% or somewhere there (in more conservative parts of the world, this number drops dramatically, but in the USA, probably 90% - atleast at college). ie:
Not to say every girl will sleep with a guy who has good game, but a large majority will, given the sexual freedoms accorded in this day and age. Wanting sex is natural, disapproving of it is societal.

2. I agree: morality has nothing to do with it. I've been fortunate to have relationships with some of the sweetest and most wonderful women on earth who wouldnt hurt a fly; and we hooked up relatively early. They were absolutely moral individuals, we were simply attracted to each other and I played my game right. Conversely, I've also met some virgins who the most vile, manipulative individuals I've had the misfortune to come across. Enjoying sex is not equal to a lack of morals. Having too many partners may be problematic and indicative of self-esteem issues, but morality doesnt come into it [unless you insist that abstinence is a part of morality, in which case those are your morals, and obviously Girl X's actions would be immoral to you].

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

Morality is tied to intentions aswell as ACTIONS!! Sluts are not moral people even though they are morally good in other respects it doesn't exclude them from being and doing a wrongful act that makes them immoral..

Millions of men are brought down emotionally, financially, psychologically by women of ill-repute! Hors are the number one reason for men's decline in the last few decades - alongside of drugs and violent behavior! Surely you see this - if not then it is because you are too young to not have seen or experience this destruction yourself. It is inly a matter of time.

I agree that hors are everywhere today and include most women. and their promiscuous behavior/actions have cause much damage among men and society in general - disease and fatherless children are everywhere -- this is known!

There was a time when wives (mothers) had babies - now hors have babies!

 

[JonJack]

Morality is indeed tied to actions. But what one deems as immoral might very well be deemed not by another.

Some believe drinking is immoral.
Some believe smoking is immoral.
Some believe having sex before marriage is immoral.
While others do not.

Hors are the number one reason for men's decline in the last few decades - alongside of drugs and violent behavior!

If the ho that ruins the lives of her clients is immoral, then the clients who gave in to their temptation are immoral too. In that case, isn't it wonderful to live in such an immoral world?

How can someone argue the fact that hos are doing something morally wrong to a person who believes that what they are doing is perfectly fine? It's like arguing with a priest that God doesn't exist.

The only reason why hos exist is men. Blame them first before you blame the hos.

 

[tmpgstx]

It goes both ways. There are man hos and women hos. They often do each other and all their friends along with it.

If banging your best friend's girl one is night is ok with both you and he, then go for it. To me though, this is not good. It doesn't show any integrity or value of the other person or yourself really.

Everyone needs to sew their oats, but if you're doing it with a biker gang or a cheerleading squad - that's all your purogitive.

I on the other hand am a one woman at a time man. I don't multi-task women. Because i'm this way, i too expect it from my girl also. It is about respect. I don't want some guy dipping his wick in my woman when i'm out of town, it's disrespectful and shows or holds no value for you in the relationship.

 

[Blue Phoenix]

Sluts are fun for awhile. They usually have a lot of emotional baggage.

I just love good girls. They seem to be less messed up!