Let’s break it down...
Woman detects a bit of feminine in the man = a bit of uncertainty. (Weak frame)
Ex boyfriend calls girl and she wants to see if something is still there or if she hammers down the final nail.
Knows it’s underhanded business but also knows that socially, the correct action is to come clean so he will overlook it and set a precedence. To see how malleable he is to the imperative.
Man becomes uncertain because she “came clean” and it’s socially benevolent to “forgive” with no other thought. But he knows somewhere in himself that it is somehow a red flag. Becomes confused.
Cause = weak frame due to social feminine programming in the man at the start.
Woman, who supposedly operates on cues triggered by emotions (biology) knew that she could get away with this from past experiences and the greatness of society that backs her.
Knowing down in her DNA and the effectiveness of her female brain and endocrine system (emotions) is the ruling parameter. She just knows how she feels.
She tries to slip this test by to qualify the man.
Weak man says...
It’s all the woman’s fault because she followed her survival programming devised over millions of years and she is so blatantly disrespectful.
She’s a terrible creature.
Spare me the victim bull$hit.
Soution...man works on how he thinks so that he can present himself as an optimal man.
Ex calls girl (got the number from a third party)...girl blocks him forever. Problem never comes up.
Yes and no.
Some women are damaged beyond repair. They have taken on too many dlcks, lost their ability to pair bond, and incited by their falling SMV, all feats are ego-serving machinations. These women, men should not take ownership for as they are simply incorrigible. Let them down in their mania.
But for women who have not corrupted, the onus falls squarely on the man.
We can also state that the onus falls squarely on the man in choosing which of the two above women to deal with correct intent.