I did not make any claims about where and when humans evolved or the time frame involved, I said it was indeterminant. Some scientist do not believe human evolution started in what's now Africa, or that it even happened in one location and have DNA and other evidence to back it up. Forget the animal bones and the DNA theories, where's the artifacts that show human habitation first? Around Europe and the Middle east, not in Africa.Cr1msonKing said:PS stated that the first Humans evolved in Africa.
Where as your stating they evolved in the Middle East and Europe, 25,000 years ago.
My university anthropology class teaches me the "Out of Africa" theory.
The common belief about our origins among the majority of scientists is that we evolved in Africa, around 200,000.
I'd love to see links to factual evidence. I just can't hold you on your word, when I've been told otherwise.
The internet makes searching easy, and since your belief is "right", it shouldn't be too hard to find on Google.
What I said was that the races are likely a splinter off of a common ancestor. Perhaps nature divide out the races. People who are darker among other attributes paired off with other people who were darker among other attributes, and people who were lighter among other attributes paired off with other people who are lighter among other attributes. And what do you know, you still see this type of human nature today. The black ethno-centricist are trying to say everyone splintered from them, when it more likely that they are splinter from another ancestor, just like every other race.
It's mostly a modern social convention backed by a lot of junk science to try to dictate Nature and that says the racist aren't different and should all be mixed together like paint. Sounds more like de-evolution to me. But none of this makes any real difference now. Now we have distinct races with differing attributes. I prefer my own race and women who also do. The only reason some people have a problem with it is their pride.