Iron Rule of Tomassi # 2
NEVER, under pain of death, honestly or dishonsetly reveal the number of women you've slept with or explain any detail of your sexual experiences with them to a current lover.
The single most disastrous AFC move a man can make is to OVERTLY describe past sexual experiences and/or give a number (accurate or not) to how many women he's been with prior to the one he's with. This simple act, whether you offered the information or she dragged it out of you, ALWAYS comes off as pretensiousness and is often the catalyst for an avalanche of emotional resentment, if not outright emotional blackmail from an insecure woman. This is a rookie mistake that will only take you once to learn.
If a woman puts you on the spot by directly asking you for this information always sidestep this COVERTLY. C&F works wonders in this situation and still keeps the air of mystery and challenge about you.
When a woman asks you this question she is seeking confirmation of what she already suspects and/or knows - NEVER give her this satisfaction. When a woman resorts to OVERT communication (COVERT being her native language) she's generally exhausted her patience to be COVERT and this is a desperation tactic for an insecure woman.
Why do you think she wants details of your experience with a stripper? Is she doing a college study about it? Does she get off on the mental image of you knocking it out with a woman who's more attractive and more sexually talented than she is? Do you think she'll ratchet up her sexual performance once she knows where the bar is set for her? Or do you think she'll shove your nose in it at the first opportunity when you have a fight?
My other thought is this; women fear a man who knows his own self-worth. Nothing annoys them more, and nothing defeats their own efforts to establish a relationship's frame than a guy who's had demonstrable success with a high-value woman. The Man who is aware of his value MUST be humbled in order for her to establish frame. Regardless of realities, a stripper has the perception of being a high-value woman if for no other reason than that she commands a lot of male attention. Whether this is from her physique or her sexual availability makes no difference - the perception is still the same; many men desire her and YOU were the one she found acceptable. You ƒucked the stripper and therefore you have something that a high-value woman found desirable.
This is her benchmark now. The stripper is the one with whom she must compete - and BTW, this is precisely why most women hate strippers and hate porn; they both take sex out of a realm of mystery that serves the feminine in establishing frame - naturally it pisses women off that other women would demonstrably prove their sexual talents for a man they are competing for. She knows that she cannot compete, or is uncomfortable competing with the stripper, therefore she must find covert ways to devalue and disqualify the sexual experience you had with her.
And long planned feminine social conventions are already established to help her do so. The first is the stripper will be called a slut and thereby should exempt her from ANY man's long term considerations. Sluts can't be trusted, sluts sleep around, sluts are disloyal, etc., is always the first tool a woman will use in her disqualification of competition, irrespective of knowing any personal detail about the competition. Second will be the shaming of the guy for having "lowered" himself to ƒucking a stripper. This has the effect of devaluing his sexual experience with her for convenient and contrived esoteric reasons. He must become the flawed one for having done so while simultaneously having her 'save' him from himself by providing him with "meaningful" sex. Competition neutralized, and frame established in her favor.
