Let me address the OP really quick. Its rare that people change their relationship habits after they become grown adults in their mid 20s. I could maybe say theres a possibility that a teenager made mistakes in relationships and rectified their behavior in their older years, but Id not believe so regarding an adult whos constantly made bad relationship decisions. In which case I feel, once a cheat always a cheat. And your girlfriend has cheated many a time.
Id dump her and move on. The drama or STD risks shed bring are not worth even keeping her as a FWB.
My experiences, as well as plenty of other mens experiences, is that female noobs can be pretty drab sexually...aka frigid. Older female virgins and women who havent had much of a sexual history, tend to have sexual hangups. Any man with experience with these women can tell you that. My saying I prefer women with some experience, DOES NOT mean I want women who have exhibited indiscriminate sexual behavior.
You guys need to learn to slow down, read word for word, and stop trying to inject your own false inferences into someones post. I have said time and time again that I dont want a inexperienced good girl, nor do I want a super experienced bad girl skank. Ive always said I want a woman whos experienced life within reason, and has not gotten to wild.
People keep trying to make this black and white, as if the only choices are a very conservative women or a wh0re. How hard is it to read and understand exactly what someone writes time and time again? I dislike both of those options, and have enjoyed dating women who dont fall into either category.
You say Im looking for a fight, yet was bokanovsky's first post even on topic in this thread? His initial post was just another attempt to instigate and giggle with another guy who he agrees with. Its the same bs in a lot of the threads on this board with some posters. When they disagree with someone, instead of maturely addressing solely the points made, theres a whole lot of insults, attacks on someones masculinity, and constant attempts to tie someone elses viewpoints to feminism.
Its like a goddamn playground here. Its always the same ole debate tactics of "omg, another straight male does not want the same women I do, nor the same kind of society I want? Gosh, I guess its time to attack his sexuality, debase his character, or tie his views to feminism. I mean, because it couldnt possibly be that men are different and dont all want the same things. It couldnt possibly be that some men arrive to their own choices and conclusions without giving a fvk what other men or women think. Nah, couldnt be that. Lets shame him for thinking different than I do."
Id dump her and move on. The drama or STD risks shed bring are not worth even keeping her as a FWB.
Why is reading comprehension so hard for many of you here? Trust me, I dont need to dumpster dive, but I also know the reality of sexual appetite and skill of virgins vs somewhat experienced women vs wh0res.SocialLeper said:
Read my posts again with comprehension this time.
My experiences, as well as plenty of other mens experiences, is that female noobs can be pretty drab sexually...aka frigid. Older female virgins and women who havent had much of a sexual history, tend to have sexual hangups. Any man with experience with these women can tell you that. My saying I prefer women with some experience, DOES NOT mean I want women who have exhibited indiscriminate sexual behavior.
You guys need to learn to slow down, read word for word, and stop trying to inject your own false inferences into someones post. I have said time and time again that I dont want a inexperienced good girl, nor do I want a super experienced bad girl skank. Ive always said I want a woman whos experienced life within reason, and has not gotten to wild.
People keep trying to make this black and white, as if the only choices are a very conservative women or a wh0re. How hard is it to read and understand exactly what someone writes time and time again? I dislike both of those options, and have enjoyed dating women who dont fall into either category.
Gimme a flipping break with this bull. If you go into each of the threads with these dudes trying to troll me, youll see that I generally address the OP and stay on topic, until trolls run into the thread insulting people just because they disagree with their opinion. Thats generally how things work on SS. A lot of guys cant disagree with someone without trying to put them down. Lord knows they dont debate with men like that in real life, but the internet gives them that kind of bravado.
You say Im looking for a fight, yet was bokanovsky's first post even on topic in this thread? His initial post was just another attempt to instigate and giggle with another guy who he agrees with. Its the same bs in a lot of the threads on this board with some posters. When they disagree with someone, instead of maturely addressing solely the points made, theres a whole lot of insults, attacks on someones masculinity, and constant attempts to tie someone elses viewpoints to feminism.
Its like a goddamn playground here. Its always the same ole debate tactics of "omg, another straight male does not want the same women I do, nor the same kind of society I want? Gosh, I guess its time to attack his sexuality, debase his character, or tie his views to feminism. I mean, because it couldnt possibly be that men are different and dont all want the same things. It couldnt possibly be that some men arrive to their own choices and conclusions without giving a fvk what other men or women think. Nah, couldnt be that. Lets shame him for thinking different than I do."
