Social_Leper said:
"cannot handle it" - aka having standards.
Clearly you have trouble understanding the point of my previous post.
Im saying that a man shouldn't ask questions if he's not prepared for the worst answers, because not asking those questions protects his sanity. It has nothing to do with the damn woman, and eveything to do with the man remaining sane and not obsessing over ish.
Have your standards, as I have mine. But I wont push and prod and cause myself anguish if I dont need to. I wont wait months and months to ask a girl further screening questions. OP should have screened will before committing.
The purpose of obtaining such info is to find out who she really is.
I have a friend who parrots the same femcentric mantra of "her past is her past" and he wonders why he finds himself committing to low quality women. It's one failed relationship after another. I just shake my head.
To shame men for taking an interest in a potential girlfriend's sexual history is ludicrous and denies the very obvious correlation between stable marriages (or LTRs) and female fidelity with number of prior sexual partners.
Plus why commit to someone who was perfectly happy to wh0re around before she met you. :nono:
Femcentric? Are you daft?
Where the fvk did I say her past is her past? Quote it instead of putting words in my mouth.
I fvking said that every woman will have a sexual past. This is a damn reality that dudes need to accept so they can enjoy dating and stop fixating on this crap all the time. A guy needs to reasonable figure out what he's comfortable with in a woman, and then seek out that woman. Not date chicks outside of his standards, and then b!tch about it later because he didnt screen his woman properly.
Also, like I also said...a man needs reasonable standards, because having too strict standards will leave him searching for a long time to be happy if relationships are his goal. Plus, dudes who constantly interrogate women with questions can be lied to. As we know many women lie about their past. Heck, the girl Im seeing now has a tame past, but there are still parts of it that bother me. And despite that, I cannot say with 100% certainty that Im not being lied to.
Understand what I was getting at now? Yeah, have your standards, but have realistic standards, and stick to a good screening process. A lot of grief can be avoided if more guys screen properly early on before committing, and stuck to their standards.
Danger said:
The point is to not marry a h0r.....they are for fvcking only.
Believe it or not there are actually some girls out there who are not h0rs. So stop hating on women so much and accusing them all of being one.
The thing with this is that wh0re can be subjective. And so many women, even the tamer ones, have had frisky periods sadly.
I know girls who have partner counts under 5, yet had a few of those partners be a string of flings before they found someone they really wanted a relationship with again. Some guys will see that as no biggie. But some guys wont like that she ever had a string of casual sex, despite a rather lower partner count in our modern days.