Tenacity
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,926
- Reaction score
- 2,194
Just a general question to the community over here. I'm trying to figure out as I continue my fitness goals, why in the hell does the fitness community as a whole seem very inconsistent?
It would appear to me that fitness is based on scientific foundations, which means that while you might have 4 different guys doing the same scientific study, if they are truly experts in the field, they should all get about the same results. Correct?
But for the life of me, the fitness community is so damn inconsistent and it's hard to truly understand and find answers to what you are looking for, because the answers change quicker than your ability to ask the questions.
For example, on the topic of Cardio:
One guy says: Don't do cardio, it burns up too much muscle, just strength train and eat right.
Another guy says: Do cardio, but only do it early in the morning on an empty stomach and using HITT.
Another guy says: Do cardio, but don't do it on an empty stomach and don't use HITT, do a lighter cardio version.
Who the hell do you listen to? All three guys in this case would usually be in pretty good shape, so whatever strategy they are following is working for THEM, but which strategy would work for me?
Is the entire fitness procedure really an individual based system? Which means, what works for Tenacity might not work for you? What worked for you might not work for Tenacity? Or can everybody truly get the same results (or about the same results) by following a particular path?
Another example, the eat 6 meals a day recommendation. I cannot eat 6 meals a day, number one I don't have enough damn time and two, when I FOLLOWED that strategy, I was gaining weight! And it wasn't muscle either.
What's been working for me is to eat 3-4 small/moderate meals a day with 6-8 hour duration in between them. That's what's been working for me, but guys on here who swear by 6 meals a day will say that my eating plan is stupid and I should convert to the 6 meals a day, even though the 6 meals a day wasn't working and my eating plan is working.
It's so freaking confusing man. And I'm starting to get to the point of thinking that most of the fitness gurus themselves really have no clue. It's similar to Stock Brokers, they will make claims that they know where a Stock is going based on their analysis, but nobody really has a freaking clue. For every 10 experts that say a Stock is going up, you have 10 experts that say it's going down, who the fvck is right??
It would appear to me that fitness is based on scientific foundations, which means that while you might have 4 different guys doing the same scientific study, if they are truly experts in the field, they should all get about the same results. Correct?
But for the life of me, the fitness community is so damn inconsistent and it's hard to truly understand and find answers to what you are looking for, because the answers change quicker than your ability to ask the questions.
For example, on the topic of Cardio:
One guy says: Don't do cardio, it burns up too much muscle, just strength train and eat right.
Another guy says: Do cardio, but only do it early in the morning on an empty stomach and using HITT.
Another guy says: Do cardio, but don't do it on an empty stomach and don't use HITT, do a lighter cardio version.
Who the hell do you listen to? All three guys in this case would usually be in pretty good shape, so whatever strategy they are following is working for THEM, but which strategy would work for me?
Is the entire fitness procedure really an individual based system? Which means, what works for Tenacity might not work for you? What worked for you might not work for Tenacity? Or can everybody truly get the same results (or about the same results) by following a particular path?
Another example, the eat 6 meals a day recommendation. I cannot eat 6 meals a day, number one I don't have enough damn time and two, when I FOLLOWED that strategy, I was gaining weight! And it wasn't muscle either.
What's been working for me is to eat 3-4 small/moderate meals a day with 6-8 hour duration in between them. That's what's been working for me, but guys on here who swear by 6 meals a day will say that my eating plan is stupid and I should convert to the 6 meals a day, even though the 6 meals a day wasn't working and my eating plan is working.
It's so freaking confusing man. And I'm starting to get to the point of thinking that most of the fitness gurus themselves really have no clue. It's similar to Stock Brokers, they will make claims that they know where a Stock is going based on their analysis, but nobody really has a freaking clue. For every 10 experts that say a Stock is going up, you have 10 experts that say it's going down, who the fvck is right??